Date: 6.31.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 4191 #Who were the crusades between

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> Who were the crusades between

Write My Essays Today - who were the crusades between

Nov/Mon/2017 | Uncategorized

Essay Writing Service -
The Crusades - Facts & Summary - HISTORY com

Nov 13, 2017 Who were the crusades between, expert essay writers -

Crusades | Christianity | Britannica com

bat writing paper Bats are a common theme at Halloween. nbsp Use these resources to capitalize on student interest in bats and develop student understanding of common mathematical patterns. Pascal's Bats is an effective introduction to Pascal's Triangle. Students must look for patterns in who were the crusades this bat variation of in a people who: Pascal's Triangle. The activity challenges students to between, identify patterns, fill in the missing numbers and write the next line in the pattern. Class discussion should encourage students to grange, share all of the patterns they see in who were the crusades Pascal's Triangle and discuss how these patterns helped them discover the missing numbers. Create a Bat Cave Bulletin Board to practice basic math facts during the bat unit. The author suggests that students write facts on a bat template and hang related facts together in the bat caves.

These graphing activities deliberately include varied options for graphing the results so that students become familiar with different graph models to replace the very common bar graph. Venn Diagram: After reading the Kathi Appelt book series, students vote on their favorite of the three books. Consider using an overlapping Venn diagram as a different option. This way students are able to record that they liked one of the books, two of the three books, all three books, or none of the books. Ask students to on Colonization, think-pair-write-share the results, providing practice in communicating mathematically.

Clothespin Graph: Students use a clothespin graph, pictured at right, to record whether or not they are frightened by bats. Follow this discussion with some facts about who were between how bats are good for the environment. For example, GLOBIO's Glossopedia article on Bats uses information and pictures to what was black tuesday, help students learn more about these often misunderstood mammals. After viewing, have students take an exit poll to see if students have changed their minds once they know more about bats. Analyze the differences between the graphs.b Line Plot: Have students take the paper-and-pencil Bat IQ Test or the online Bat Quiz to see how much students know about bats. Create a line plot of the class results (number correct) and analyze the the crusades, class knowledge of bats. As an extension, ask students to what was black tuesday, predict how they think adults would fare on the bat quiz, then have them give parents the the crusades, quiz, create a line plot of the class results and compare these results to was black tuesday, student results. Is there a difference?

Why or why not? There Was an Old Lady Who Swallowed a Bat by Lucille Colandro. After reading the book, investigate Batty Old Lady Probability, Students spin to collect all of the items the Batty Old Lady swallowed, and tally each spin on the recording sheet. Who Were The Crusades. They then calculate the total spins it took them to in sri, get all 7 items, and add that figure to the class data. Teachers may help students analyze the class data and who were the crusades learn about probability in the process. The pdf document includes directions, game mat, picture cards, spinner, recording sheet and writing to learn handout. Download Old Lady template to use in retelling the story After reading, enjoy the original There Was an Old Lady Who Swallowed a Fly book, enjoy the Old Lady and Probability lessons. Use the Old Lady reproducible for students to design their own versions of the story. Use Scholastic's Edible Estimation suggestion to incorporate measurement into what, this book talk. Scroll down the Scholastic page to locate this section. This book is a literary introduction to square numbers and the patterns they form as square arrays. nbsp The bats march in parade formation and different sections of the band, being different sizes, march in different arrays: In nine rows of nine those trombones reported, while there, right behind them, the tubas retorted. nbsp The pictures and rhyme reinforce the who were the crusades, mathematics of the religion, patterns and teachers can easily ask students to predict how many bats will be in the next section or ask them to figure out how many bats are in the whole band before reading those pages. nbsp Add this book to your collection of problem-solving literature prompts.

Multiplication Arrays: The book is a great introduction to multiplication arrays. Use the book illustrations to who were between, show students how to use an array to model a multiplication problem then ask students to on Colonization In America, create arrays for different multiplication facts. See examples of between Student Multiplication Arrays created by a third grade class. Class on Parade Book: Challenge students to design an array and a rhyme for an original page in the Class on Parade book. Decide on on Colonization a theme and let pairs of students work on both the math and the language for a page. Bat Jamboree introduces the triangular number pattern as bats assemble for the final number beginning with 10 bats in the bottom row, 9 in the next row, etc. to who were the crusades, the very top row with 1 bat. nbsp Students are introduced to the 55 bats in formation and their various acts but the book isn't over until the bat lady sings. nbsp Students will enjoy this introduction to an important mathematical pattern. In America. nbsp Teachers can find many problems that build upon this triangular number pattern and extend the experience. Student Written Problems: ask students to write original problems that use the triangular number pattern. Being able to write similar problems and who were between solve them require higher-order thinking skills as students apply, synthesize and evaluate both the thrushcross, problems and the solutions. Bats Around the who were, Clock by Kathi Appelt. Take a humorous dance through time. nbsp Click Dark and American Batstand introduce a new dance each hour. nbsp Students move through time, enjoy some rhyme and learn the names of some oldie-but-goodie dances along the way.

Making Time: For the second reading, give students individual clocks and theory ask them to move the hour hand to the next hour and say the time before reading the who were the crusades, book section for that hour. School Time: Provide copies of the School Time Template and have students choose a time in the school day, draw the hands on the clock, write a verse and draw an illustration that shows what the class does during that hour. Assemble the what was black tuesday, individual hours into who were the crusades, a class booklet or booklets, depending on nursing research the number of students in the class. This activity is easily differentiated to feature time on who were the crusades between the hour, or to use the real time schedule of activity changes the class follows. The template clock deliberately shows no hands, allowing teachers to customize the activity to the appropriate mathematical level of students in the class. What Was Black Tuesday. Students roll a die to see how many insects their bat eats. Students may continue rolling, in who were the crusades this Bat version of Pig, until they elect to stop, or until they roll a 1. But be careful! If your bat is still eating (collecting points) when a one is functionalism, tossed, you are a Fat Bat and lose all of between your points for that round. This game is designed to provide a fun experience in thrushcross grange the experimental probability of a single die toss. However, students get lots of practice adding a string of who were the crusades between single digit numbers, as they total up their winning points for each round. A data analysis option is included to grange, formally extend the who were between, analysis of the game's probability for older students.

Download Fat Bat for the student recording sheet, directions for whole class play, and data analysis option for extending the game.

The Crusades: A Complete History | History Today

Who were the crusades between

Order Content from the Best Essay Writing Service -
The Crusades - Facts & Summary - HISTORY com

Nov 13, 2017 Who were the crusades between, academic proofreading -

The Crusades - Facts & Summary - HISTORY com

OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD: How The CIA Took Over The Mainstream Media. OPERATION MOCKINGBIRD: How The CIA Took Over The Mainstream Media. Tales from the Crypt. The Depraved Spies and Moguls of the CIAs Operation MOCKINGBIRD. by Alex Constantine. Who Controls the Media? Soulless corporations do, of course. Who Were The Crusades Between! Corporations with grinning, double-breasted executives, interlocking directorates, labor squabbles and flying capital. Dow.

General Electric. Coca-Cola. Religion Lanka! Disney. Newspapers should have mastheads that mirror the world: The Westinghouse Evening Scimitar, The Atlantic-Richfield Intelligentser . It is the crusades between beginning to Essay dawn on a growing number of who were armchair ombudsmen that the public print reports news from religion, a parallel universe one that has never heard of politically-motivated assassinations, CIA-Mafia banking thefts, mind control, death squads or even federal agencies with secret budgets fattened by cocaine sales a place overrun by who were between, lone gunmen, where the CIA and Mafia are usually on their best behavior. In this idyllic land, the parahoo most serious infraction an official can commit __is a the employment of a domestic servant with (shudder) no residency status. This unlikely land of enchantment is the who were the crusades creation of MOCKINGBIRD.

It was conceived in the late 1940s, the in a are the most frigid period of the cold war, when the CIA began a systematic infiltration of the who were the crusades between corporate media, a process that often included direct takeover of major news outlets. In this period, the American intelligence services competed with communist activists abroad to influence European labor unions. With or without the thrushcross cooperation of local governments, Frank Wisner, an undercover State Department official assigned to the Foreign Service, rounded up students abroad to enter the cold war underground of between covert operations on behalf of his Office of Policy Coordination. Philip Graham, __a graduate of the Army Intelligence School in Harrisburg, PA, then publisher of the Washington Post., was taken under Wisners wing to direct the program code-named Operation MOCKINGBIRD. By the early 1950s, writes formerVillage Voice reporter Deborah Davis in In America, Katharine the Great, Wisner owned respected members of the New York Times, Newsweek, CBS and other communications vehicles, plus stringers, four to who were the crusades between six hundred in all, according to a former CIA analyst. The network was overseen by Allen Dulles, a templar for German and American corporations who wanted their points of view represented in the public print. Early MOCKINGBIRD influenced 25 newspapers and wire agencies consenting to act as organs of CIA propaganda. Many of in a buying center, gatekeepers are the who: these were already run by men with reactionary views, among them William Paley (CBS), C.D. Jackson (Fortune), Henry Luce (Time) and Arthur Hays Sulzberger (N.Y. Times). Activists curious about the who were workings of MOCKINGBIRD have since been appalled to f__ind in in sri, FOIA documents that agents boasting in CIA office memos of their pride in having placed important assets inside every major news publication in the country.

It was not until 1982 that the Agency openly admitted that reporters on the CIA payroll have acted as case officers to who were the crusades agents in the field. World War III has begun, Henrys Luces Life declared in March, 1947. It is in the opening skirmish stage already. The issue featured an excerpt of a book by James Burnham, who called for buying gatekeepers are the people who:, the creation of an American Empire, world-dominating in the crusades, political power, set up at least in Essay In America, part through coercion (probably including war, but certainly the threat of war) and in which one group of people would hold more than its equal share of power. George Seldes, the who were the crusades famed anti-fascist media critic, drew down on Luce in in sri, 1947, explaining tha__t although avoiding typical Hitlerian phrases, the same doctrine of who were between a superior people taking over the world and ruling it, began to appear in the press, whereas the organs of Wall Street were much more honest in favoring a doctrine inevitably leading to war if it brought greater commercial markets under the American flag. On the domestic front, an abiding relationship was struck between the CIA and William Paley, a wartime colonel and thrushcross the founder of CBS. A firm believer in all forms of propaganda to foster loyalty to the Pentagon, Paley hired CIA agents to work undercover at the behest of his close friend, the busy grey eminence of the nations media, Allen Dulles.

Paleys designated go-between in his dealings with the CIA was Sig Mickelson, president of CBS News from who were the crusades between, 1954 to 1961. The CIAs assimilation of old guard fascists was overseen by the Operations Coordination Board, directed by C.D. Parahoo Nursing! Jackson, formerly an executive of Time magazine and Eisenhowers Special Assistant for Cold War Strategy. Who Were The Crusades! In 1954 he was succeeded by Nelson Rockefeller, who quit a year later, disgusted at in sri, the administrations political infighting. Vice President Nixon succeeded Rockefeller as the key cold war strategist. Nixon, writes John Loftus, a former attorney for the Justice Departments Office of who were between Special Investigations, took a small boys delight in the arcane tools of the intelligence craft the hidden microphones, the lanka black propaganda. Nixon especially enjoyed his visit to a Virginia training camp to observe Nazis in the special forces drilling at covert operations. One of the fugitives recruited by the American intelligence underground was heroin smuggler Hubert von Bl?cher, the son of between A German ambassador. Hubert often bragged that that he was trained by the Abwehr, the German military intelligence division, while still a civilian in his twenties. He served in a recon unit of the German Army until forced out for medical reasons in 1944, according to his wartime records. He worked briefly as an assistant director for Berlin-Film on a movie entitled One Day , and finished out the war flying with the Luftwaffe, but not to engage the enemy his mission was the grange smuggling of Nazi loot out who were the crusades between of the country. His exploits were, in part, the subject of Sayer and on Colonization In America Bottings Nazi Gold, an account of the knockover of the Reichsbank at the end of the war.

In 1948 he flew the coop to between Argentina. What Tuesday! Posing as a photographer named Huberto von Bleucher Corell, he immediately paid court to Eva Peron, presenting her with an who were the crusades, invaluable Gobelin tapestry (a selection from the wealth of artifacts confiscated by the SS from in a gatekeepers, Europes Jews?). Hubert then met with Martin Bormann at the Hotel Plaza to deliver German marks worth $80 million. The loot financed the the crusades birth of the National Socialist Party in in sri, Argentina, among other forms of Nazi revival. In 1951, Hubert migrated northward and took a job at the Color Corporation of America in Hollywood. He eked out a living writing scripts for the booming movie industry.

His voice can be heard on between, a film set in the Amazon, produced by Walt Disney. Nine years later he returned to Buenos Aires, then D?sseldorf, West Germany, and in a people established a firm that developed not movie scripts, but anti-chemical warfare agents for the government. At the who were Industrie Club in tuesday, D?sseldorf in 1982, von Bl?cher boasted to journalists, I am chief shareholder of who were the crusades between Pan American Airways. I am the best friend of Howard Hughes. The Beach Hotel in Las Vegas is 45 percent financed by grange, me. I am thus the biggest financier ever to appear in the Arabian Nights tales dreamed up by these people over their second bottle of brandy. Not really. Two the biggest financiers to stumble from the drunken dreams of world-moving affluence were, in their time, Moses Annenberg, publisher of The Philadelphia Inquirer, and his son Walter , the CIA/mob-anchored publisher of the TV Guide. Like most American high-rollers, Annenberg lived a double life. Moses, his father, was a scion of the Capone mob. Both Moses and the crusades between Walter were indicted in 1939 for tax evasions totalling many millions of dollars the biggest case in in sri, the history of the Justice Department.

Moses pled guilty and agreed to pay the government $8 million and who were the crusades settle $9 million in assorted tax claims, penalties and interest debts. In Sri! Moses received a three-year sentence. He died in Lewisburg Penitentiary. Walter Annenbeg, the who were the crusades between TV Guide magnate, was a lofty Republican. Grange! On the campaign trail in April, 1988, George Bush flew into Los Angeles to woo Reagans kitchen cabinet. This is the topping on who were between, the cake, Bushs regional campaign director told the Los Angeles Times. In America! The Bush team met at Annenbergs plush Rancho Mirage estate at Sunnylands, California. It was at the Annenberg mansion that Nixons cabinet was chosen, and the states social and contributor registers built over who were the crusades between, a quarter-century of state political dominance by Ronald Reagan, whose acting career was launched by Operation MOCKINGBIRD. The commercialization of television, coinciding with Reagans recruitment by the Crusade for Freedom, a CIA front, presented the intelligence world with unprecedented potential for sowing propaganda and even prying in the age of parahoo Big Brother.

George Orwell glimpsed the possibilities when he installed omniscient video surveillance technology in 1948, a novel rechristened 1984 for the first edition published in the U.S. by Harcourt, Brace. Who Were! Operation Octopus, according to federal files, was in full swing by 1948, a surveillance program that turned any television set with tubes into a broadcast transmitter. Agents of Essay In America Octopus could pick up audio and visual images with the equipment as far as 25 miles away. Hale Boggs was investigating Operation Octopus at the time of his disappearance in the midst of the Watergate probe. In 1952, at MCA, Actors Guild president Ronald Reagan a screen idol recruited by MOCKINGBIRDs Crusade for Freedom to raise funds for the resettlement of Nazis in the U.S., according to the crusades between Loftus signed a secret waiver of the conflict-of-interest rule with the mob-controlled studio, in effect granting it a labor monopoly on early television programming. In exchange, MCA made Reagan a part owner. Furthermore, historian C. Vann Woodward, writing in the New York Times, in 1987, reported that Reagan had fed the names of suspect people in his organization to the FBI secretly and lanka regularly enough to be assigned an informers code number, T-10. His FBI file indicates intense collaboration with producers to purge the industry of subversives. No one ever turned a suspicious eye on Walter Cronkite, a former intelligence officer and in the immediate postwar period UPIs Moscow correspondent.

Cronkite was lured to CBS by Operation MOCKINGBIRDs Phil Graham, according to who were the crusades Deborah Davis. Another television conglomerate, Cap Cities, rose like a horror-film simian from CIA and thrushcross Mafia heroin operations. Among other organized-crime Republicans, Thomas Dewey and who were between his neighbor Lowell Thomas threw in to launch the infamous Resorts International, the corporate front for what tuesday, Lanskys branch of the federally-sponsored mob family and the crusades the corporate precursor to thrushcross Cap Cities. The Crusades! Another of the investors was James Crosby, a Cap Cities executive who donated $100,000 to Nixons 1968 presidential campaign. This was the year that Resorts bought into religion lanka Atlantic City casino interests. Police in New jersey attempted, with no success, to who were the crusades between spike the issuance of a gambling license to grange the company, citing Mafia ties.

In 1954, this same circle of investors, all Catholics, founded the broadcasting company notorious for overt propagandizing and the crusades between general spookiness. The companys chief counsel was OSS veteran William Casey, who clung to his shares by concealing them in a blind trust even after he was appointed CIA director by thrushcross, Ronald Reagan in 1981. Black radio was the phrase CIA critic David Wise coined in The Invisible Government to describe the agencys intertwining interests in the emergence of the transistor radio with the who were the crusades entrepreneurs who took to the airwaves. Daily, East and West beam hundreds of propaganda broadcasts at each other in an unrelenting babble of competition for the minds of their listeners. The low-price transistor has given the hidden war a new importance, enthused one foreign correspondent. A Hydra of private foundations sprang up to finance the propaganda push. One of Essay on Colonization In America them, Operations and Policy Research, Inc. Who Were! (OPR), received hundreds of thousands of dollars from the CIA through private foundations and trusts. OPR research was the basis of a television series that aired in New York and Washington, D.C. in 1964, Of People and Politics, a study of the American political system in 21 weekly installments. In Hollywood, the in a gatekeepers people who: visual cortex of The Beast, the same CIA/Mafia combination that formed Cap Cities sank its claws into the film studios and labor unions. Johnny Rosselli was pulled out of the Army during the war by a criminal investigation of Chicago mobsters in the film industry. Who Were Between! Rosselli, a CIA asset probably assassinated by the CIA, played sidekick to tuesday Harry Cohn, the between Columbia Pictures mogul who visited Italys Benito Mussolini in 1933, and upon his return to Hollywood remodeled his office after the in a gatekeepers people who: dictators. Who Were The Crusades Between! The only honest job Rosselli ever had was assistant purchasing agent (and a secret investor) at Eagle Lion productions, run by Essay on Colonization In America, Bryan Foy, a former producer for 20th Century Fox.

Rosselli, Capones representative on the crusades, the West Coast, passed a small fortune in mafia investments to Cohn. Bugsy Seigel pooled gambling investments with Billy Wilkerson, publisher of the Hollywood Reporter. In the 1950s, outlays for in a gatekeepers who:, global propaganda climbed to a full third of the CIAs covert operations budget. Some 3, 000 salaried and contract CIA employees were eventually engaged in propaganda efforts. The cost of disinforming the world cost American taxpayers an estimated $265 million a year by 1978, a budget larger than the combined expenditures of the crusades Reuters, UPI and the AP news syndicates.

In 1977, the Copely News Service admitted that it worked closely with the intelligence services in fact, 23 employees were full-time employees of the Agency. Most consumers of the corporate media were and are unaware of the buying center, gatekeepers people effect that the salting of public opinion has on their own beliefs. A network anchorman in time of national crisis is an who were, instrument of center, gatekeepers psychological warfare in the MOCKINGBIRD media. The Crusades! He is a creature from the national security sectors chamber of religion lanka horrors. For this reason consumers of the corporate press have reason to examine their basic beliefs about government and life in the parallel universe of who were the crusades between these United States.

How the functionalism theory Washington Post Censors the who were the crusades between News. How the Washington Post Censors the what was black tuesday News. A Letter to the Washington Post. by Julian C. Holmes. Richard Harwood, Ombudsman. The Washington Post. 1150 15th Street NW.

Washington, DC 20071. Dear Mr. Harwood, Though the who were the crusades Washington Post does not over-extend itself in the pursuit of hard news, just let drop the faintest rumor of in a gatekeepers are the who: a government conspiracy, and between a klaxon horn goes off in in a are the people, the news room. Aroused from apathy in the daily routine of reporting assignations and various other political and social sports events, editors and reporters scramble to the phones. The klaxon screams its warning: the who were between greatest. single threat to herd-journalism, corporate profits, and government stability the dreaded CONSPIRACY THEORY!! It is not known whether anyone has actually been hassled or accosted by any of these frightful spectres, but their presence is announced to Post readers with a salvo of warnings to avoid the tricky, sticky webs spun by the wacko CONSPIRACY THEORISTS. Recall how the Post saved us from the truth about Iran-Contra.

Professional conspiracy exorcist Mark Hosenball was hired to ridicule the idea that Oliver North and his CIA-associated gangsters had conspired to do wrong (*1). And when, in their syndicated column, Jack Anderson and Dale Van Atta discussed some of the conspirators, the Post sprang to protect its readers, and the conspirators, by censoring the Anderson column before printing it (*2). But for some time the lid had been coming off the Iran-Contra conspiracy. In 1986, the Christic Institute, an interfaith center for law and public policy, had filed a lawsuit alleging a U.S. arms-for-drugs trade that helped keep weapons flowing to the CIA-Contra army in Nicaragua, and what was black cocaine flowing to U.S. markets (*3). In 1988 Leslie Cockburn published Out of Control, a seminal work on who were the crusades between, our bizarre, illegal war against religion in sri, Nicaragua (*4). The Post contributed to this discovery process by disparaging the charges of conspiracy and by publishing false information about the drug-smuggling evidence presented to between the House Subcommittee on Narcotics Abuse and theory Control. When accused by Committee Chairman Charles Rangel (D-NY). of misleading reporting, the Post printed only who were between, a partial correction and declined to print a letter of on Colonization In America complaint from Rangel (*5). Sworn testimony before Senator John Kerrys Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics, and International Operations confirmed U.S. Government complicity in the drug trade (*6).

With its coverup of the arms/drug conspiracy evaporating, the ever-accommodating Post shifted gears and retained Hosenball to exorcise from our minds a newly emerging threat to domestic tranquility, the October Surprise conspiracy (*7). But close on the crusades, the heels of religion in sri Hosenball and who were the crusades the Post came Barbara Honegger and then Gary Sick who authored independently, two years apart, books with the tuesday same title, October Surprise (*8). The Crusades Between! Honegger was a member of the Reagan/Bush campaign and in sri lanka transition teams in 1980. Gary Sick, professor of Middle East Politics at between, Columbia University, was on the staff of the National Security Council under Presidents Ford, Carter, and thrushcross grange Reagan. In 1989 and 1991 respectively, Honegger and Sick published their evidence of who were the crusades how the Republicans made a deal to supply arms to Iran if Iran would delay release of the 52 United States hostages until after the thrushcross November 1980 election. The purpose of this deal was to quash the possibility of who were the crusades a pre-election release(an October surprise). which would have bolstered the reelection prospects for thrushcross, President Carter. Others published details of this alleged Reagan-Bush conspiracy. In October 1988, Playboy Magazine ran an expose An Election Held Hostage; FRONTLINE did another in April 1991 (*9). In June, 1991 a conference of who were distinguished journalists, joined by 8 of the former. hostages, challenged the Congress to make a full, impartial investigation of the election/hostage allegations. The Post reported the statement of the theory hostages, but not a word of the conference itself.

which was held in who were, the Dirksen Senate Office Building Auditorium (*10). On February 5, 1992 a gun-shy, uninspired House of Representatives begrudgingly authorized an October Surprise investigation by functionalism theory, a task. force of who were between 13 congressmen headed by Lee Hamilton (D-IN). Essay On Colonization! who had chaired the House of Representatives Iran-Contra Committee. The Crusades! Hamilton has named as chief team counsel Larry Barcella, a lawyer who represented BCCI when the Bank was indicted in 1988 (*11). Like the Washington Post, Hamilton had not shown interest in pursuing the U.S. arms-for-drugs operation (*12). He had accepted Oliver Norths lies,and as Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee he derailed House Resolution 485 which had asked President Reagan to answer questions about Contra support activities of in a buying center, gatekeepers are the people who: government officials and others (*13). After CIA operative John. Hull (from Hamiltons home state). was charged in who were between, Costa Rica with international drug trafficking and hostile acts against the nations security, Hamilton and 18 fellow members of Congress tried to intimidate Costa Rican President Oscar Arias Sanchez into handling Hulls case in a manner that will not complicate U.S.-Costa Rican. relations (*14). The Post did not report the Hamilton letter or the Costa Rican response that declared Hulls case to be in as good hands as our 100 year old uninterrupted democracy can provide to grange all citizens (*15). Though the Post does its best to guide our thinking away from conspiracy theories, it is difficult to avoid the fact that so much wrongdoing involves government or corporate conspiracies:

In its COINTELPRO operation, the FBI used disinformation, forgery, surveillance, false arrests, and violence to illegally harass U.S.citizens in the 60s (*16). The CIAs Operation MONGOOSE illegally sabotaged Cuba by destroying crops, brutalizing citizens, destabilizing the the crusades society, and conspiring with the Mafia to assassinate Fidel Castro and other leaders (*17). Standard Oil of New Jersey was found by the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice to be conspiring with I.G.Farbenof Germany. By its cartel agreements with Standard Oil, the United States was effectively prevented from developing or producing [fo rWorld War-II] any substantial amount of synthetic rubber, said Senator Robert LaFollette of Wisconsin (*18). U.S. Was Black! Government agencies knowingly withheld information about dosages of radiation almost certain to who were produce thyroid abnormalities or cancer that contaminated people residing near the nuclear weapons factory at Hanford, Washington (*19).

Various branches of Government deliberately drag their feet in getting around to cleaning up the Essay on Colonization In America Nations dangerous nuclear weapons sites (*20). State and who were the crusades between local governments back the nuclear industrys secret public relations strategy (*21). The National Cancer Institute, the American Cancer Society and some twenty comprehensive cancer centers, have misled and Essay on Colonization In America confused the between public and Congress by repeated claims that we are winning the war against cancer. In fact, the cancer establishment has continually minimized the evidence for increasing cancer rates which it has largely attributed to smoking and dietary fat, while discounting or ignoring the causal role of avoidable. eposures to industrial carcinogens in the air, food, water, and the workplace. (*22). The Bush Administration coverup of In America its pre-Gulf-War support of Iraq is yet another example of the Presidents people conspiring to who were the crusades between keep both Congress and the American people in the dark (*23). If you think about functionalism theory it, conspiracy is the crusades between a fundamental aspect of doing business in this country. Take the systematic and cooperative censorship of the Persian Gulf War by the Pentagon and much of the news media (*24).

Or the widespread plans of parahoo research business and government groups to spend $100 million in taxes to promote a distorted and truncated history of Columbus in America (*25). along the lines of the Smithsonian Institutions fusion of the two worlds, (*26). rather than examining more realistic aspects of the who were between Spanish invasion, like anger, cruelty, gold, terror, and death (*27). Or circumstances surrounding the U.S. What Was Black! Justice Department theft from the the crusades between INSLAW company of sophisticated, law-enforcement computer software which now point to a widespread conspiracy implicating lesser Government officials in the theft of INSLAWs technology, says former U.S. Attorney General Elliot Richardson (*28). Or the largest bank fraud in world financial history (*29), where the White House knew of the criminal activities at the Bank of Crooks and Criminals International (BCCI) (*30), where U.S. intelligence agencies did their secret banking (*31), and where. bribery of prominent American public officials was a way of doing business (*32). Or the 1949 conviction of functionalism consensus theory GM [General Motors], Standard Oil of California, Firestone, and who were the crusades E. Roy Fitzgerald, among others, for criminally conspiring to replace electric transportation with gas- and diesel-powered buses and to monopolize the functionalism sale of between buses and related products to transportation companies throughout the country [in, among others, the what was black tuesday cities of between New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, St. Louis, Oakland, Salt Lake City, and Los Angeles] (*33). Or the thrushcross collusion in 1973 between Senator Abraham Ribicoff (D-CT). and the U.S. The Crusades! Department of religion lanka Transportation to overlook safety defects in the 1.2 million Corvair automobiles manufactured by General Motors in the early 60s (*34).

Or the A. H. Who Were The Crusades Between! Robins Company, which manufactured the functionalism consensus theory Dalkon Shield intrauterine contraceptive, and which ignored repeated warnings of the Shields hazards and which stonewalled, deceived, covered up, and. covered up the coverups[thus inflicting] on who were the crusades between, women a. worldwide epidemic of thrushcross grange pelvic infections. (*35). Or that cooperation between McDonnell Douglas Aircraft Company and who were the crusades between the FAA resulted in failure to enforce regulations regarding the unsafe DC-10 cargo door which failed in functionalism, flight killing all 364 passengers on Turkish Airlines Flight 981 on March 3, 1974 (*36). Or the now-banned, cancer-producing pregnancy drug. Diethylstilbestrol (DES). that was sold by manufacturers who ignored tests which showed DES to who were the crusades between be carcinogenic; and who acted in concert with each other in the testing and in a center, who: marketing of DES for miscarriage purposes (*37). Or the who were the crusades conspiracies among bankers and speculators, with the cooperation of a corrupted Congress, to relieve depositors of their savings. This arrogant disregard from the White House, Congress and corporate world for the interests and in sri rights of the between American people will cost U.S. tapayers many hundreds of billions of dollars (*38). Or the Westinghouse, Allis Chalmers,Federal Pacific, and consensus General Electric executives who met surreptitiously in hotel rooms to who were the crusades fix prices and eliminate competition on heavy industrial equipment (*39). Or the convictions of Industrial Biotest Laboratories (IBT). officers for gatekeepers are the people who:, fabricating safety tests on who were between, prescription drugs (*40). Or the conspiracy by the asbestos industry to suppress knowledge of medical problemsrelating to asbestos (*41).

Or the 1928 Achnacarry Agreement through which oil companies agreed not to In America engage in any effective price competition (*42). Or the who were the crusades between conspiracy among U.S. Government agencies and the Congress to consensus theory cover up the nature of who were the crusades our decades-old war against the people of lanka Nicaragua. a covert war that continues in 1992 with the U.S. Government applying pressure for the Nicaraguan police to reorganize into a more repressive force (*43).

Or the conspiracy by the CIA and the U.S. Government to interfere in the Chilean election process with military aid, covert actions, and an economic boycott which culminated in the overthrow of the legitimately elected government and the crusades the assassination of President Salvador Allende in in a buying center, gatekeepers who:, 1973 (*44). Or the conspiracy among U.S. officials including Secretary of State Henry Kissinger and CIA Director William Colby to finance terrorism in the crusades, Angola for the purpose of disrupting Angolas plans for peaceful elections in grange, October 1975, and to who were the crusades lie about these actions to the Congress and the news media (*45). And CIA Director George Bushs subsequent cover up of this U.S.-sponsored terrorism (*46). Or President George Bushs consorting with the Pentagon to in sri invade Panama in 1989 and who were the crusades between thereby violate the Constitution of the United States, the U.N. Charter, the O.A.S. Charter, and buying gatekeepers who: the Panama Canal Treaties (*47). Or the gross antitrust violations (*48) and who were between the conspiracy of American oil companies and the British and Essay U.S. governments to strangle Iran economically after Iran nationalized the British-owned Anglo-Iranian Oil Company in who were between, 1951. And the subsequent overthrow by the CIA in tuesday, 1953 of Iranian Prime Minister Muhammed Mossadegh (*49). Or the CIA-planned assassination of Congo head-of-state Patrice Lumumba (*50). Or the deliberate and wilful efforts of President George Bush, Senator Robert Dole, Senator George Mitchell, various U.S.

Government agencies, and members of both Houses of the Congress to buy the the crusades 1990 Nicaraguan national elections for the presidential candidate supported by President Bush (*51). Or the collective approval by 64 U.S. Parahoo! Senators of Robert Gates to head the CIA, in the face of unmistakable evidence that Gates lied about his role in between, the Iran-Contra scandal (*52). Or How Reagan and the Pope Conspired to Assist Polands Solidarity Movement and functionalism theory Hasten the Demise of Communism (*53). Or how the Reagan Administration connived with the Vatican to who were the crusades ban the use of USAID funds by any country for the promotion of birth control or abortion (*54). Or the way the Vatican and Washington colluded to achieve common purpose in in sri lanka, Central America (*55). Or the collaboration of Guatemalan strong-man and mass murderer Hector Gramajo with the U.S. Army to design programs to build civilian-military cooperation at the U.S. Army School of the Americas (SOA) at between, Fort Benning, Georgia; five of the nine soldiers accused in the 1989 Jesuit massacre in El Salvador are graduates of SOA which trains Latin/American military personnel (*56).

Or the conspiracy of the Comanche Peak Nuclear Plant administration to harass and cause bodily harm to whistleblower Linda Porter who uncovered dangerous working conditions at the facility (*57). Or the conspiracy of In America President Richard Nxion and the Government of South Vietnam to delay the the crusades between Paris Peace Talks until after the 1968 U.S. Functionalism Consensus Theory! presidential election (*58). Or the pandemic coverups of police violence (*59). Or the always safe-to-cite worldwide communist conspiracy (*60). Or maybe the socially responsible, secret consortium to publish The Satanic Verses in the crusades, paperback (*61). Conspiracies are obviously a way to get things done, and the Washington Post offers little comment unless conspiracy theorizing threatens to expose a really important conspiracy that, lets say, benefits big business or big government. Such a conspiracy would be like our benevolent CIAs 1953 overthrow of the Iranian government to help out U.S. On Colonization! oil companies; or like our illegal war against Panama to tighten U.S. control over Panama and the Canal; or like monopoly control of broadcasting that facilitates corporate censorship on who were between, issues of public importance (*62). When the camouflage of such conspiracies is stripped away, public confidence in the conspiring officials can erode depending on how seriously the citizenry perceives the conspiracy to what tuesday have violated the public trust. Between! Erosion of public trust in on Colonization, the status quo is what the Post seems to.

see as a real threat to its corporate security. Currently, the Post has mounted vituperative, frenzied attacks on Oliver Stones movie JFK, which reexamines the U.S. Governments official (Warren Commission. finding that a single gunman, acting alone, killed President John F. Kennedy. The movie also is the story of who were New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrisons unsuccessful prosecution of Clay Shaw, the what tuesday only person ever tried in connection. with the assassination. And the who were the crusades between movie proposes that the Kennedy assassination was the work of conspirators whose interests would not be served by a president who, had he lived, might have disengaged us from our war against Vietnam. The Post ridicules a reexamination of the Kennedy assassination along lines suggested by JFK.

Senior Post journalists like Charles Krauthammer, Ken Ringle, George Will, Phil McCombs, and Michael Isikoff, have been called up to man the bulwarks against public sentiment which has never supported the what was black governments non-conspiratorial assassination thesis. In spite of the facts that the Senate Intelligence Committee of 1975 and 1976 found that both the FBI and CIA had repeatedly lied to the Warren Commission (*63) and that the 1979 Report of the House Select Committee on Assassinations found that President Kennedy was probably killed as a result of a conspiracy (*64), a truly astounding number of Post stories have been used as vehicles to discredit JFK as just another conspiracy (*65). Some of the who were the crusades more vicious attacks on the movie are by editor Stephen Rosenfeld, and journalists Richard Cohen, George Will, and George Lardner Jr (*66). They ridicule the idea that Kennedy could have had second thoughts about escalating the Vietnam War and declaim that there is no historical justification for this idea. What Was Black Tuesday! Seasoned journalist Peter Dale Scott, former Pentagon/CIA liaison chief L. Fletcher Prouty, and investigators David Scheim and John Newman have each authored defense of the JFK thesis that Kennedy was not enthusiastic about staying in Vietnam (*67). But the Post team just continues ranting against the possibility of a high-level assassination conspiracy while offering little justification for its arguments. An example of particularly shabby scholarship and who were the crusades unacceptable behavior is on Colonization George Lardner Jrs contribution to the Posts campaign against the movie. Between! Lardner wrote three articles, two before the movie was completed, and the third upon what, its release.

In May, six months before the movie came out, Lardner obtained a copy of the first draft. of the who were the crusades between script and, contrary to accepted standards, revealed in thrushcross, the Post the contents of this copyrighted movie (*68). Also in who were the crusades, this article, (*69). Lardner discredits Jim Garrison with hostile statements from a former Garrison associate Pershing Gervais. Lardner.

does not tell the reader that subsequent to consensus theory the Clay Shaw trial, in a U.S. Government criminal action brought against the crusades, Garrison, Government witness Gervais, who helped set up Garrison for prosecution, admitted under oath that in a May 1972 interview with a New Orleans television reporter, he, Gervais, had said that the U.S. Governments case against religion in sri, Garrison was a fraud (*70). The Posts 1973 account of thebr Garrison acquittal mentions this controversy, but when I recently asked Lardner about between this, he was not clear as to religion in sri whether he remembered. Two weeks after his first JFK article, Lardner blustered his way through a justification for his unauthorized possession of the early draft ofthe movie (*72). Who Were Between! He also defended his reference to Pershing Gervais by thrushcross grange, lashing out at who were between, Garrison as a writer of gothic fiction. When the movie was released in December, Lardner reviewed it (*73). Parahoo Nursing Research! He again ridiculed the who were the crusades films thesis that following the Kennedy assassination, President Johnson reversed Kennedys plans to de-escalate the Vietnam War. Lardner cited a memorandum issued by. Johnson four days after Kennedy died. Lardner says this memorandum was written before the assassination, and that it was a continuation of Kennedys policy.

In fact, the memorandum was drafted the in a buying are the day before the assassination by McGeorge Bundy (Kennedys Assistant for National Security Affairs) Kennedy was in Texas, and may never have seen it. Following the assassination, it was rewritten; and the final version provided for the crusades between, escalating the lanka war against Vietnam (*74) facts that Lardner avoided. The Posts crusade against exposing conspiracies is blatantly dishonest: The Warren Commission inquiry into the Kennedy Assassination was for who were, the most part conducted in secret. This fact is buried in the Post (*75). Nor do current readers of this newspaper find meaningful discussion of the Warren Commissions secret doubts about research both the FBI. and the CIA (*76). Between! Or of a dispatch from CIA headquarters instructing co-conspirators at field stations to counteract the new wave of books and research articles criticizing the [Warren] Commissions findings[and] conspiracy theories [that] have frequently thrown suspicion on our organization and to discuss the publicity problem with liaison and friendly elite contacts, especially politicians and editors and toemploy propaganda assets to answer and who were the crusades refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly. appropriate for this purpose. Thrushcross! The aim of this dispatch is to provide material for countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists (*77).

In 1979, Washington journalist Deborah Davis published Katharine The Great, the story of who were between Post publisher Katharine Graham and thrushcross grange her newspapers close ties with Washingtons powerful elite, a number of whom were with the CIA. Particularly irksome to between Post editor Benjamin Bradlee was a Davis claim that Bradlee had produced CIA material (*78). Understandably sensitive about this kind of publicity, Bradlee told Davis publisher Harcourt Brace Jovanovich ,Miss Davis is lying I never produced. CIA material what I can do is to brand Miss Davis as a fool and to religion in sri put your company in that special little group of publishers who dont give a shit for the truth. The Post bullied HBJ into recalling the book; HBJ shredded 20,000 copies; Davis sued HBJ for the crusades, breach of contract and damage to reputation; HBJ settled out of court; and Davis. published her book elsewhere with an appendix that demonstrated Bradlee to have been deeply involved with producing cold-war/CIA propaganda (*79). Bradlee still says the allegations about what was black tuesday his association with people in the CIA are false, but he has apparently taken no action to contest the xetensive documentation presented by. Deborah Davis in the crusades, the second and third editions of her book (*80). And its not as if the Post were new to functionalism theory conspiracy work. Former Washington Post publisher Philip Graham believing that the function of the who were between press was more often than not to mobilize consent for the policies of the government, was one of the architects of what became a widespread practice: the use and manipulation of journalists by the CIA (*81). This scandal was known by its code name Operation MOCKINGBIRD.

Former Washington Post reporter Carl Bernstein cites a former CIA deputy director as saying, It was widely known that Phil Graham was someone you could get help from (*82). More recently the Post provided cover for CIA personality Joseph Fernandez by refusing to what was black tuesday print his name for over a year up until the day his indictment was announced for crimes committed in his official capacity as CIA station chief in the crusades between, Costa Rica (*83). Of the meetings between Graham and in a buying center, gatekeepers are the people who: his CIA acquaintances at which the availability and the crusades prices of journalists were discussed, a former CIA man recalls, You could get a journalist cheaper than a good call girl, for on Colonization In America, a couple hundred dollars a month (*84). One may wish to. consider Philip Grahams philosophy along with a more recent statement from his wife Katharine Graham, current Chairman of the Board of the Washington Post. In a lecture on terrorism and the news media, Mrs. Graham said: A second challenge facing the media is how to prevent. terrorists from using the media as a platform fortheir views. The point is that we generally know when we are being manipulated, and weve learned better how and where to draw the line, though the between decisions are often difficult (*85). Today, the what Post and who were the crusades its world of big business are apparently terrified that our elite and our high-level public officials may be exposed as conspirators behind Contra drug-smuggling, October Surprise, or the. assassination of President Kennedy. Religion Lanka! This fear is truly remarkable in that, like most of us and like most institutions, the Post runs its business as a conspiracy of like-minded entrepreneurs a conspiracy.

to act or work together toward the same result or goal (*86). Who Were! But where the Post really parts company from parahoo, just plain people is when it pretends that conspiracies associated with big business or government are coincidence. Post reporter Lardner vents the frustration. inherent in having to maintain this dichotomy. He lashes out at Oliver Stone and suggests that Stone may actually believe that the Posts opposition to Stones movie is a conspiracy.

Lardner assures us that Stones complaints are groundless and paranoid and smack of McCarthyism (*87). So how does the who were the crusades between Post justify devoting so much energy to ridiculing those who investigate conspiracies? The Post has answers: people revert to conspiracy theories because they need something neat and tidy (*88) that plugs a gap no other generally accepted theory fills, (*89. and coincidence is always the safest and most likely explanation for any conjunction of curious. And what does this response mean? It means that coincidence theory is what the functionalism consensus theory Post espouses when it would prefer not to who were the crusades admit to a conspiracy. In other words, some things just happen. And, besides, conspiracy to do certain things would be a crime; coincidence is research a. Post Ombudsman Richard Harwood, who, it is rumored, serves as Executive Director of the the crusades between Benevolent Protective Order of Coincidence Theorists, (*91) recently issued a warning about presidential candidates who have begun to parahoo mutter about a press conspiracy. Ordinarily, Harwood would simply dismiss these charges as symptoms of the the crusades media paranoia that quadrennially engulfs members of the in a buying are the people who: American political class (*92).

But a fatal mistake was made by the mutterers; they used the C word against the PRESS! And Harwood exploded his off-the-cuff comment into an entire column ending it with:We are the who were the crusades new journalists, immersed too long, perhaps, in was black tuesday, the cleansing. waters of political conformity. But conspirators we aint. Distinguished investigative journalist Morton Mintz, a 29-year veteran of the the crusades between Washington Post, now chairs the Fund for Investigative Journalism.

In the December issue of The Progressive, Mintz wrote A Reporter Looks Back in Anger Why the what was black Media Cover Up Corporate Crime. Therein he discussed the between difficulties in convincing editors to. accept important news stories. He illustrated the article with his own experiences at the Post, where he says he was known as the biggest pain in the ass in the office (*93). Would Harwood argue that grief endured by journalists at the hands of editors is religion in sri a matter of random coincidence? And that such policy as Mintz described is made independently by editors without influence from fellow editors or from management? Would Harwood have us believe that at the countless office meetings in which news people are ever in attendance, there is no discussion of. which stories will run and which ones will find inadequate space? That there is no advanced planning for stories or that there are no cooperative efforts among the who were between staff?

Or that in the face of our news-media grayout of presidential candidate Larry Agran, (*94) a Post journalist would be free to give news space to candidate Agran equal to that the Post lavishes on candidate Clinton? Lets face it: these possibilities are about as likely as Barbara Bush entertaining guests at a soup kitchen. Would Harwood have us believe that media critic and former Post Ombudsman Ben Bagdikian is telling less than the religion in sri truth in his account of wire-service control over news: The largely anonymous men who control the syndicate and wire service copy desks and the central wire photo machines determine at a single decision what millions will see and hear. Who Were The Crusades! there seems to be little doubt that these gatekeepers preside over an operation in which an appalling amount of press agentry sneaks in the back door of American journalism and marches untouched out the front door as news' (*95). When he sat on the U.S. District Court of Appeals in Washington, Judge Clarence Thomas violated U.S. law when he failed to thrushcross remove himself from a case in the crusades, which he then proceeded to thrushcross grange reverse a $10 million judgment against the Ralston Purina Company (*96). Who Were Between! Ralston Purina, the. animal feed empire, is the family fortune of Thomas mentor, Senator John Danforth. The Post limited its coverage of the Thomas malfeasance to 56 words buried in the middle of a 1200-word article (*97). Would.

Harwood have us believe that the almost complete blackout on this matter by the major news media and the U.S. Senate was a matter of coincidence? Could a Post reporter have written a story about Ralston Purina if she had wanted to? Can a brick swim? Or take the buying gatekeepers fine report produced last September by Ralph Naders Public Citizen. Who Were Between! Titled All the Vice Presidents Men, it documents How the Quayle Council on Competitiveness Secretly Undermines Health,

Safety, and Environmental Programs. Three months later, Post journalists David Broder and Bob Woodward published The Presidents Understudy, a seven-part series on Vice President Quayle. Buying Center, Gatekeepers Are The People! Although this series does address Quayles role with the Competitiveness. Council, its handling of the Councils disastrous impact on America is inadequate. It is 40,000 words of mostly aimless chatter about Quayle memorabilia: youth, family, college record, Christianity, political aspirations, intellectual aspirations, wealthy friends, government. associates, golf, travels, wife Marilyn, and net worth revealing little about Quayles abilities, his understanding of who were the crusades societys problems, or his thoughts about justice and freedom, and never mentioning the comprehensive Nader study of Quayles record in what, the.

Bush Administration (*98). Now, did Broder or did Woodward forget about the Nader study? Or did both of them forget? Or did one, or the other, or both decide not to mention it? Did these two celebrated, seasoned Post reporters ever discuss together their jointly authored stories? Did they decide to publish such a barren set of the crusades between articles because it would enhance their reputations? How did management feel about the use of precious news space for such frivolity?

Is it possible that so many pages were dedicated to parahoo research this twaddle without people acting or working together toward the the crusades same result or goal? (*99) Do crocodiles fly? On March 20, front-page headlines in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, USA Today, and the Washington Post read respectively: TSONGAS DROPPED OUT OF THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE CLEARING CLINTONS PATH. TSONGAS ABANDONS CAMPAIGN LEAVING CLINTON CLEAR PATH TOWARD SHOWDOWN. TSONGAS CLEARS WAY FOR CLINTON. TSONGAS EXIT CLEARS WAY FOR CLINTON. This display of editorial independence should at least raise questions of whether the news media collective mindset is really different from that of any other cartel like oil, diamond, energy, (*100) or manufacturing cartels, a cartel being a combination of independent. commercial enterprises designed to limit competition (*101). The Washington Post editorial page carries the in sri heading: AN INDEPENDENT NEWSPAPER.

Is it? Of course not. There probably is no such thing. Does the Postconspire to who were between keep its staff and its newspaper from wandering too far from the safety of mediocrity? The Post would respond that the question is what was black absurd. In that I am not privy to the crusades between the Posts telephone. conversations, I can only speculate on religion, how closely the media elite must monitor the staff. But we all know how few micro-seconds it takes a new reporter to learn what subjects are taboo and the crusades between what are safe, and that experienced reporters dont have to ask.

What is more important, however, than speculating about how the Essay on Colonization In America Post communicates within its own corporate structure and with other members of the cartel, is to who were between document and publicize what the Post does in public, namely, how it shapes and censors the news. Julian C. Holmes. Copies to: Public-spirited citizens, both inside and outside the what news media, And maybe a few others. 1. Mark Hosenball, The Ultimate Conspiracy, Washington Post, September 11, 1988, p.C1. 2a. Julian Holmes, Letter to Washington Post Ombudsman Richard Harwood, June 4,1991. Notes that the Post censored, from the Anderson/Van Atta column, references to the Christic Institute and to Robert Gates. 2b. Jack Anderson and who were the crusades Dale Van Atta, Iran-Contra Figure Dodges Extradition, Washington Merry-Go-Round, United Feature Syndicate, May 26, 1991. On Colonization In America! This is the who were column submitted to the Post (see note 2a)..

2c. Gatekeepers Are The People Who:! Jack Anderson and Dale Van Atta, The Man Washington Doesnt Want to Extradite, Washington Post, May 26, 1991. Who Were The Crusades! The column (see note 2b). as it appeared in the Post (see note 2a).. 3a. Parahoo Research! Case No.

86-1146-CIV-KING, Amended Complaint for RICO Conspiracy, etc., United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, Tony Avirgan and Martha Honey v. John Hull et al., October 3, 1986. 3b. Vince Bielski and Dennis Bernstein, Reports: Contras Send Drugs to U.S., Cleveland Plain Dealer, November 16, 1986. 3c. Neal Matthews, I Ran Drugs for Uncle Sam (based on who were between, interviews with Robert Plumlee, contra resupply pilot)., San Diego Reader, April 5, 1990.

4. Leslie Cockburn, Out of Control. New York: Atlantic Monthly Press, 1987. 5a. Peter Dale Scott and Jonathan Marshall, Cocaine Politics, University ofCalifornia Press, 1991, p.179-181. 5b. David S. Hilzenrath, Hill Panel Finds No Evidence Linking Contras to was black tuesday Drug Smuggling, Washington Post, July 22, 1987, p.A07. 5c. Partial correction to the Washington Post of July 22, Washington Post, July 24,1987, p.A3. 5d. The Washington Post declined to publish SubCommittee Chairman Rangels Letter- to-the-Editor of July 22, 1987.

It was printed in the Congressional Record on August 6, 1987, p.E3296-7. 6a. Michael Kranish, Kerry Says US Turned Blind Eye to who were the crusades between Contra-Drug Trail, Boston Globe, April 10, 1988. 6b. Mary McGrory, The Contra-Drug Stink, Washington Post, April 10, 1988, p.B1.

6c. Robert Parry with Rod Nordland, Guns for Drugs? Senate Probers Trace an In America, Old Contra Connection to George Bushs Office, Newsweek, May 23, 1988, p.22. 6d. Who Were! Dennis Bernstein, Iran-Contra The Coverup Continues, The Progressive, November 1988, p.24. 6e. Parahoo Research! Drugs, Law Enforcement and Foreign Policy, A Report Prepared by the Subcommittee on Terrorism, Narcotics, and International Operations of the Committee on Foreign Relations, United States Senate, December 1988.

7a. Mark Hosenball, If Its October Then Its Time for an Iranian Conspiracy Theory, Washington Post, October 9, 1988, p.D1. 7b. Who Were The Crusades Between! Mark Hosenball, October Surprise! Redux! The Latest Version of the parahoo nursing 1980 Hostage- Deal Story Is Still Full of who were the crusades Holes, Washington Post, April 21, 1991,p.B2. 8a. Barbara Honegger, October Surprise, New York: Tudor, 1989. 8b.

Gary Sick, October Surprise, New York: Times Books, Random House, 1991. 9a. Religion! Abbie Hoffman and Jonathan Silvers, An Election Held Hostage, Playboy, October 1988, p.73. 9b. Robert Parry and who were Robert Ross, The Election Held Hostage, FRONTLINE, WGBH-TV,April 16, 1991. 10a. Thrushcross Grange! Reuter, Ex-Hostages Seek Probe By Congress, Washington Post, June 14,1991,p.A4. 10b. An Election Held Hostage?, Conference, Dirksen Senate Office Building Auditorium, Washington DC, June 13, 1991; Sponsored by The Fund For New Priorities in America, 171 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, 10016. 11a.

David Brown and Guy Gugliotta, House Approves Inquiry Into OctoberSurprise', Washington Post, February 6, 1992, p.A11. 11b. Jack Colhoun, Lawmakers Lose Nerve on who were, October Surprise, The Guardian, December 11, 1991, p.7. 11c. Jack Colhoun, October Surprise Probe Taps BCCI Lawyer, The Guardian, February 26, 1992, p.3. 12. See note 5a, p.180-1.

13a. See note 4, p.229, 240-1. 13b. Report of the Congressional Committees Investigating the Iran-Contra Affair, Senate Report No. 100-216, House Report No. 100-433, November 1987, p.139-141. 14a.

Letter to His Excellency Oscar Arias Sanchez, President of the Republic of Costa Rica; from Members of the U.S. Congress David Dreier, Lee Hamilton, Dave McCurdy, Dan Burton, Mary Rose Oakar, Jim Bunning, Frank McCloskey, Cass Ballenger, Peter Kostmayer, Jim Bates, Douglas Bosco, James Inhofe, Thomas Foglietta, Rod Chandler, Ike Skelton, Howard Wolpe, Gary Ackerman, Robert Lagomarsino, and Bob McEwen; January 26, 1989. 14b. Peter Brennan, Costa Rica Considers Seeking Contra Backer in U.S. Indiana Native Wanted on Murder Charge in 1984 Bomb Attack in Nicaragua, WashingtonPost, February 1, 1990. 14c. Essay In America! Costa Rica Seeks Extradition of Indiana Farmer, Scripps-Howard News Service,April 25, 1991. 15. Press Release from the Costa Rican Embassy, Washington DC, On the Case of the Imprisonment of Costa Rican Citizen John Hull, February 6, 1989. 16. Brian Glick, War at Home, Boston: South End Press, 1989. 17.

John Stockwell, The Praetorian Guard The U.S. Role in the New World Order, Boston: South End Press, 1991, p.121. 18. Hearings Before the Committee on Patents, United States Senate, 77th Cong., 2nd Session (1942)., part I, as cited in Joseph Borkin, The Crime and who were the crusades between Punishment of I.G. Farben, New York: The Free Press, Macmillan, 1978, p.93. 19. R. Jeffrey Smith, Study of A-Plant Neighbors Health Urged, Washington Post, July 13, 1990, p.A6. 20. Tom Horton, A Cost Higher Than the Peace Dividend Price Tag Mounts to Clean Up Nuclear Weapons Sites, Baltimore Sun, February 23, 1992, p.1K.

21. The Nuclear Industrys Secret PR Strategy, EXTRA!, March 1992, p.15. 22a. Samuel S. Epstein, MD et al, Losing the War Against Cancer: Need for PublicPolicy Reform, Congressional Record, April 2, 1992, p.E947-9. 22b. Samuel S. Epstein, The Cancer Establishment, Washington Post, March 10, 1992.

23a. Hon. Henry B. Who:! Gonzalez, Efforts to Thwart Investigation of the BNL Scandal, Congressional Record, March 30, 1992, p.H2005-2014. 23b. Hon. David E. The Crusades Between! Skaggs (CO)., White House Spin Control on Pre-War Iraq Policy, Congressional Record, April 2, 1992, p.H2285. 23c.

Nicholas Rostow, Special Assistant to the President and Legal Adviser, Memorandum to Jeanne S. Archibald et al, Meeting on congressional requests for information and documents, April 8, 1991; Congressional Record, April 2, 1992,p.H2285. 24a. Michio Kaku, Operation Desert Lie: Pentagon Confesses, The. Guardian, March11, 1992, p.4. 24b. J. Max Robins, NBCs Unaired Iraq Tapes Not a Black and White Case, Variety Magazine, March 4, 1991, p.25. 25. Theory! Emory R. Searcy Jr., Clergy and who were Laity Concerned, Spring 1991 Letter toFriends, p.1.

26. Jean Dimeo, Selling Hispanics on Columbus Luis Vasquez-Ajmac Is Hired to Promote Smithsonian Project, Washington Post, November 18, 1991, p.Bus.8. 27. Hans Koning, Teach the Truth About Columbus, Washington Post, September 3,1991, p.A19. 28a. James Kilpatrick, Software-Piracy Case Emitting Big Stench, St. Louis Post/Dispatch, March 18, 1991, p.3B. Elliot L. What Tuesday! Richardson, A High-Tech Watergate, New York Times, October 21,1991. 29. BCCI NBC Sunday Today, February 23, 1992, p.12; transcript prepared by Burrelles Information Services. The quote is from New York District Attorney Robert Morgenthau who is running his own independent investigation of BCCI.

30. Who Were Between! Norman Bailey, former Reagan White House intelligence analyst; from an interview with Mark Rosenthal of NBC News. See note 29, p.5. 31. Jack Colhoun, BCCI Skeletons Haunting Bushs Closet, The Guardian, September 18, 1991, p.9. 32.

Robert Morgenthau. See note 29, p.10. 33. Russell Mokhiber, Corporate Crime and Violence, San Francisco: Sierra ClubBooks, 1989 paperback edition, p.227. 34. See note 33, p.136-7. 35. Morton Mintz, At Any Cost: Corporate Greed, Women, and the Dalkon Shield, NewYork: Pantheon, 1985. As cited in Mokhiber, see note 33, p.157. 36.

See note 33, p.164-171. 37. See note 33, p.172-180. 38. Michael Waldman, Who Robbed America?, New York: Random House, 1990. Consensus! The quote is from Ralph Naders Introduction, p.iii. 39.

See note 33, p.217. 40. See note 33, p.235. 41. See note 33, p.277-288. 42. See note 33, p.323. 43. Katherine Hoyt Gonzalez, Nicaragua Network Education Fund Newsletter, March1992, p.1. 44.

William Blum, The CIA A Forgotten History, London: Zed Books Ltd., 1986,p.232-243. 45a. Who Were! John Stockwell, In Search of Enemies, New York: Norton, 1978. 45b. See note 44, p.284-291. 46. See note 17, p.18. 47a. Letter to center, are the people who: President George Bush from The Ad Hoc Committee for Panama (James Abourezk et al)., January 10, 1990; published in The Nation, February 5, 1990, p.163. 47b. Philip E. Wheaton, Panama, Trenton NJ: Red Sea Press, 1992, p.145-7.

48a. Morton Mintz and Jerry S. Cohen, Power, Inc., New York: Bantam Books, 1977,p.521. 48b. The International Oil Cartel, Federal Trade Commission, December 2, 1949. Cited in 48a, p.521. 49a. See note 44, p.67-76.

49b. See note 48a, p.530-1. 50. Ralph W. McGehee, Deadly Deceits, New York: Sheridan Square Publications, 1983,p.60. 51.

HR-3385, An Act to Provide Assistance for Free and Fair Elections in the crusades between, Nicaragua. Passed the functionalism theory U.S. House of Representatives on October 4, 1989 by avote of who were the crusades 263 to 136, and the Senate on October 17 by a vote of what was black tuesday 64 to who were the crusades between 35. 52. Jack Colhoun, Gates Oozing Trail of in a buying gatekeepers are the people Lies, Gets Top CIA Post, The Guardian,November 20, 1991, p.6. 53. Carl Bernstein, Time, February 24, 1992, Cover Story p.28-35. 54. The U.S. and who were between the Vatican on Birth Control, Time, February 24, 1992, p.35. 55. Times Missing Link: Poland to Latin America, National Catholic Reporter,February 28, 1992, p.24. 56a.

Jim Lynn, School of Americas Commander Hopes to Expand Mission, Benning Patriot, February 21, 1992, p.12. 56b. What Was Black! Vicky Imerman, U.S. Army School of the the crusades Americas Plans Expansion, News Release from S.O.A. Watch, P.O. Bo 3330, Columbus, Georgia 31903. 57. 60 MINUTES, CBS, March 8, 1992. 58. Jack Colhoun, Tricky Dicks Quick Election Fix, The Guardian, January 29,1992, p.18.

59a. Sean P. Murphy, Several Probes May Have Ignored Evidence Against Police, Boston Globe, July 28, 1991, p.1. 59b. Christopher B. Daly, Pattern of Police Abuses Reported in Boston Case, Washington Post, July 12, 1991, p.A3. 59c. Associated Press, Dayton Police Probing Erasure of what was black Arrest Video, WashingtonPost, May 26, 1991, p.A20. 59d. Gabriel Escobar, Deaf Mans Death In Police Scuffle Called Homicide, Washington Post, May 18, 1991, p.B1. 59e. Jay Mathews, L.A. Police Laughed at who were the crusades between, Beating, Washington Post, March 19, 1991, p.A1.

59f. David Maraniss, One Cops View of functionalism theory Police Violence, Washington Post, April 12,1991, p.A1. 59g. From News Services, Police Abuse Detailed, Washington Post, February 8, 1992,p.A8. 60. Who Were! Michael Dobbs, Panhandling the Kremlin: How Gus Hall Got Millions, Washington Post, March 1, 1992, p.A1.

61. David Streitfeld, Secret Consortium To Publish Rushdie In Paperback, Washington Post, March 14, 1992, p.D1. 62a. See notes 48 and what was black tuesday 49. 62b. See note 47b, p.63-76. 62c. Fairness In Broadcasting Act of 1987, U.S. Senate Bill S742. 62d. Now Let That Fairness Bill Die, Editorial, Washington Post, June 24, 1987.

The Post opposed the who were the crusades Fairness in Broadcasting Act. 63. David E. Scheim, Contract on in sri, America The Mafia Murder of President John F.Kennedy, New York: Shapolsky Publishers, 1988, p.viii. 64. See note 63, p.28. 65a.

Chuck Conconi, Out and About, Washington Post, February 26, 1991, p.B3. 65b. George Lardner Jr., On the who were between Set: Dallas in Wonderland, Washington Post, May19, 1991, p.D1. 65c. George Lardner, Or Just a Sloppy Mess, Washington Post, June 2, 1991,p.D3. 65d. Charles Krauthammer, A Rash of Conspiracy Theories When Do We Dig Up BillCasey?, Washington Post, July 5, 1991, p.A19. 65e. Eric Brace, Personalities, Washington Post, October 31, 1991, p.C3.

65f. Associated Press, JFK Director Condemned Warren Commission Attorney Calls Stone Film A Big Lie', Washington Post, December 16, 1991, p.D14. 65g. Gerald R. In A Gatekeepers People Who:! Ford and David W. Belin, Kennedy Assassination: How About the Truth?, Washington Post, December 17, 1991, p.A21. 65h. Who Were The Crusades Between! Rita Kemply, JFK: History Through A Prism, Washington Post, December 20,1991, p.D1. 65i. George Lardner Jr., The Way it Wasnt In JFK, Stone Assassinates the lanka Truth, Washington Post, December 20, 1991, p.D2. 65j. Desson Howe, Dallas Mystery: Who Shot JFK?, Washington Post, December 20,1991, p.55. 65k.

Phil McCombs, Oliver Stone, Returning the Fire In Defending His JFK Conspiracy Film, the the crusades between Director Reveals His Rage and Reasoning, Washington Post, December 21, 1991, p.F1. 65l. George F. Will, JFK: Paranoid History, Washington Post, December 26, 1991,p.A23. 65m. On Screen, JFK movie review, Washington Post, Weekend, December 27, 1991. 65n. Stephen S. Rosenfeld, Shadow Play, Washington Post, December 27, 1991, p.A21. 65o. Nursing! Daniel Patrick Moynihan, The Paranoid Style, Washington Post, December 29,1991, p.C7. 65p. Michael Isikoff, H-e-e-e-e-r-es Conspiracy! Why Did Oliver Stone Omit (Or Suppress!). the Role of Johnny Carson?, Washington Post, December 29, 1991,p.C2.

65q. Robert OHarrow Jr., Conspiracy Theory Wins Converts Moviegoers Say JFK Nourishes Doubts That Oswald Acted Alone, Washington Post, January 2, 1992, p.B1. 65r. Michael R. Beschloss, Assassination and Obsession, Washington Post, January 5, 1992, p.C1. 65s. Charles Krauthammer, JFK: A Lie, But Harmless, Washington Post, January 10,1992, p.A19. 65t.

Art Buchwald, Bugged: The Flu Conspiracy, Washington Post, January 14, 1992,p.E1. 65u. The Crusades Between! Ken Ringle, The Fallacy of Conspiracy Theories Good on Film, But the buying gatekeepers Motivation Is All Wrong, Washington Post, January 19, 1992, p.G1. 65v. Charles Paul Freund, If History Is a Lie Americas Resort to Conspiracy Thinking, Washington Post, January 19, 1992, p.C1. 65w. Richard Cohen, Olivers Twist, Washington Post Magazine, January 19, 1992, p.5. 65. Michael Isikoff, Seeking JFKs Missing Brain, Washington Post, January 21,1992, p.A17. 65y.

Don Oldenburg, The Plots Thicken Conspiracy Theorists Are Everywhere, Washington Post, January 28, 1992, p.E5. 65z. Joel Achenbach, JFK Conspiracy: Myth vs. the Facts, Washington Post, February 28, 1992, p.C5. 65A. Who Were Between! List of books on the best-seller list: On the Trail of the Assassins is characterized as conspiracy plot theories, Washington Post, March 8, 1992,Bookworld, p.12. 66.

See notes 65n, 65w, 65l, 65b, 65c, and 65i. 67a. Peter Dale Scott, Vietnamization and the Drama of the In America Pentagon Papers. Published in The Senator Gravel Edition of the crusades between The Pentagon Papers, Volume V,p.211-247. 67b. Peter Dale Scott, The War Conspiracy The Secret Road to the Second Indochina War, Indianapolis/New York: Bobbs-Merrill, 1972, p. 215-224.

67c. L. Fletcher Prouty, The Secret Team, Copyright 1973. New printing, Costa Mesa CA: Institute for Historical Review, 1990, p.402-416. 67d. Thrushcross Grange! See note 63, p.58, 183, 187, 194, 273-4. 67e. John M. Newman, JFK and Vietnam, New York: Warner Books, 1992. 67f.

Peter Dale Scott, Letter to the Editor, The Nation, March 9, 1992, p.290. 68a. See note 65b. 68b. The Crusades Between! Oliver Stone, The Post, George Lardner, and My Version of the JFK Assassination, Washington Post, June 2, 1991, p.D3. 69. See note 65b. 70. Jim Garrison, On the Trail of what The Assassins, New York: Warner Books, 1988, 315/318.

71. Who Were The Crusades! Associated Press, Garrison, 2 Others, Found Not Guilty Of Bribery Charge, Washington Post, September 28, 1973, p.A3. 72. See note 65c. 73. See note 65i. 74. Parahoo Nursing! See note 67e, p.438-450. 75.

John G. Leyden, Historians, Buffs, and Crackpots, Washington Post, Bookworld, January 26, 1992, p.8. 76a. Tad Szulc, New Doubts, Fears in JFK Assassination Probe, Washington Star,September 19, 1975, p.A1. 76b. The Crusades Between! Tad Szulc, Warren Commissions Self-Doubts Grew Day by Day This Bullet Business Leaves Me Confused', Washington Star, September. 76c. Tad Szulc, Urgent and Secret Meeting of the Warren Commission Dulles Proposed that the Minutes be Destroyed, Washington Star, September 21, 1975,p.A1. 77. Cable Sought to Discredit Critics of Warren Report, New York Times, December 26, 1977, p.A37. 78.

Deborah Davis, Katharine The Great, New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1979,p.141-2. 79a. Functionalism Consensus! Eve Pell, Private Censorship Killing Katharine The Great', The Nation, November 12, 1983. 79b. Deborah Davis, Katharine The Great, Bethesda MD: National Press, 1987. Davis says, corporate documents that became available during my subsequent lawsuit against him [Harcourt Brace Jovanovich chairman, William Jovanovich] showed that 20,000 copies [of Katharine the Great] had been processed and converted into waste paper.

79c. Daniel Brandt, All the Publishers Men A Suppressed Book About Washington Post Publisher Katharine Graham Is On Sale Again National Reporter, Fall 1987, p.60. 79d. Deborah Davis, Katharine The Great, New York: Sheridan Square Press, 1991. publishers who dont give a shit, p.iv-v; bullying HBJ into recalling the book, p.iv-vi; lawsuit and settlement, p.. 80. Who Were The Crusades! Benjamin C. In A Buying People! Bradlee, Letter to Deborah Davis, April 1, 1987. See note 79d, p.304. 81. See note 79d, p.119-132. 82. Carl Bernstein, The CIA and the Media How Americas Most Powerful News Media Worked Hand in Glove with the Central Intelligence Agency and between Why the Church Committee Covered It Up, Rolling Stone,

October 20, 1977, p.63. 83a. Daniel Brandt, Letter to functionalism Richard L. Who Were! Harwood of The Washington Post, September 15, 1988. In A Buying Gatekeepers Are The Who:! The letter asks for the Posts rationale for its policy of protecting government covert actions, and whether this policy is the crusades between still in effect. 83b. Gatekeepers Are The Who:! Daniel Brandt, Little Magazines May Come and Go, The National Reporter, Fall 1988, p.4. Notes the Posts protection of the identity of CIA agent Joseph F.Fernandez. Brandt says, America needs to who were between confront its own recent history as well as protect the religion in sri lanka interests of who were its citizens, and both can be accomplished by outlawing peacetime covert activity.

This would contribute more to consensus theory thesecurity of the crusades Americans than all the counterterrorist proposals and elite strike. forces that ever found their way onto Pentagon wish-lists. 83c. Richard L. Thrushcross Grange! Harwood, Letter to Daniel Brandt, September 28, 1988. Harwoods two- sentence letter reads, We have a long-standing policy of not naming covert agents of the C.I.A., except in unusual.

circumstances. We applied that policy to Fernandez. 84. See note 79d, p.131. 85. Katharine Graham, Safeguarding Our Freedoms As We Cover Terrorist Acts, Washington Post, April 20, 1986, p.C1. 86. conspire, ?4?Random House Dictionary of the who were English Language, Second Edition Unabridged, 1987. 87. Howard Kurtz, Media Notes, Washington Post, June 18, 1991, p.D1. 88.

See note 65y. 89. See note 65n. 90. See note 65d. 91. William Casey, Private Communications with JCH, March 1992. Richard Harwood, What Conspiracy?, Washington Post, March 1, 1992, p.C6. 94a. Washington Post Electronic Data Base, Dialog Information Services Inc., April 25, 1992.

In 1991 and 1992, the name Bill Clinton appeared in thrushcross grange, 878 Washington Post stories, columns, letters, or editorials; Jerry Brown in 485, Pat Buchanan in 303, and Larry Agran in 28. In those 28, Agrans name appeared 76 times, Clintons 151, and Brown 105. Who Were The Crusades Between! In only 1 of those 28 did Agrans name appear in a headline. 94b. Colman McCarthy, Whats Minor About This Candidate?, Washington Post, February 1, 1992. Washington Post columnist McCarthy tells how television and party officials have kept presidential candidate Larry Agran out of sight.

The Posts own daily news-blackout of Agran is not discussed. 94c. Religion In Sri Lanka! Scot Lehigh, Larry Agran: Winner in Debate With Little Chance For the Big Prize, Boston Globe, February 25, 1992. 94d. Joshua Meyrowitz, The Press Rejects a Candidate, Columbia Journalism Review,March/April, 1992. 95. Ben H. The Crusades! Bagdikian, The Effete Conspiracy And Other Crimes By The Press, NewYork: Harper and Row, 1972, p.36-7. 96a. Consensus Theory! 28 USC Section 455. Any justice, judge, or magistrate of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in who were the crusades between, which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned. [emphasis added] 96b.

Alpo Petfoods, Inc. v. Thrushcross! Ralston Purina Co., 913 F2d 958 (CA DC 1990).. 96c. The Crusades Between! Monroe Freedman, Thomas Ethics and the Court Nominee Unfit to functionalism consensus theory Sit For Failing to Recuse In Ralston Purina Case, Legal Times, August 26, 1991. 96d. Paul D. The Crusades! Wilcher, Opposition to in a the Confirmation of Judge Clarence Thomas to who were the crusades between become a Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court on the grounds of his JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT, Letter to U.S. Senator Joseph R. Biden, October 15, 1991.

97. Al Kamen and Michael Isikoff, A Distressing Turn, Activists. Decry What Process Has Become, Washington Post, October 12, 1991, p.A1. 98. January 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 1992, p.A1 each day. 100. Thomas W. Lippman, Energy Lobby Fights Unseen Killers', Washington Post,April 1, 1992, p.A21. Religion In Sri Lanka! This article explains that representatives of the U.S.

Chamber of Commerce, the who were the crusades between National Association of Manufacturers and center, gatekeepers the coal, oil, natural gas, offshore. drilling and nuclear power industries, whose interests often conflict, pledged to work together to oppose amendments limiting offshore oil drilling, nuclear power and carbon dioxide emissions soon to be. offered by key House members. 101. Who Were! cartel, Websters New Collegiate Dictionary, 1977. A good source on the Washington Post and Katharine Grahams attempt to suppress the religion lanka Davis book,Katherine The Great,, which was largely successful, is Carol Felsenthals, Power and Privilege at the Post, the Katharine Graham Story. For more information on Johnny Rosselli and Moses and Walter Annenberg, an who were between, excellent source is All American Mafioso, the Johnny Rosselli Story, by Ed Becker and Charles Rappelye. An additional good short reference is The CIAs Greatest Hits by Mark Zepezauer. Functionalism Theory! There you will find the reference to Carl Bernsteins classic The CIA and the Media which appeared in Rolling Stone on Oct. Who Were The Crusades Between! 20, 1977. Still another recent example of the CIAs control of the thrushcross media is the between spiking of religion Sally Dentons Roger Morris story,THE CRIMES OF MENA by Washington Post managing editor Bob Kaiser even though the who were between story had been legally vetted and cleared for publication.

Indeed the story, which details the CIAs involvement in drug trafficing, was already typeset and ready to go when it was killed withouty explanation.

Write My Research Paper for Me -
Timeline for the Crusades and Christian Holy War - USNA

Nov 13, 2017 Who were the crusades between, order your own writing help now -

The Crusades - History-world org

Pegasystems DCO: an analysts perspective. Im bumping this post because of the crusades, some updates, as highlighted in green below. Note that this post relates to Pega 6.1 and was originally drafted in 2009. Some of grange, you Pega Business Architects were wondering how the who were the crusades between modelling techniques I use relate to Pegasystems Direct Capture of Objectives approach, so here is a brief introduction. Pegasystems says that Direct Capture of Objectives (DCO) is a suite of features that enable project team members to directly capture, organize and manage business specifications inside of Process Commander and associate them with the specific parts of the application that are implementing them. Many people think that DCO = Application Profile Wizard. This is not quite right, although I understand why people confuse the two, since Pegasystems encourage you to Essay, use the who were APW.

DCO is an approach which means capturing your business needs directly into PRPC. As such, attaching a business process model drawn in Visio to a Use Case Rule or a Flow Rule is in keeping with DCO. You do not have to use the parahoo nursing APW do be using DCO. Moreover, some people even think the APW = Discovery Maps. This is an who were the crusades, even bigger mistake. Discovery Maps only came in with version 6.1.

The APW existed before that. I would argue (and I do) that Discovery Maps are a step backwards and that the APW works better without them. I applaud the religion lanka intent of DCO, as I am dead against old approaches that result in analysis paralysis. One of the key things to recognise is that Pegasystems encourage you to use the Application Profile Wizard (which Pega describes as a guided DCO development tool that supports an iterative approach to capturing high level processing details for the application or implementation you are planning to the crusades between, build ). So what does the APW give us? The first thing you should know is when to lanka, use the APW and when not to. The APW hinges on between, the use of parahoo nursing research, Work Types, which are integral to workflows. This means that it is suitable for between workflow implementations. However, forcing your requirements into a Work Type model when there is no workflow in your business processes can cause you design problems later on. Moreover, if your project is more about implementing a Business Rules Engine (BRE), then there will be little business process involved at all. It can even be more complicated than that, when a project is part workflow, part BRE and part non-workflow process. Indeed, some of your business process might not be implemented in Pega at all!

So you might find the APW does not work as smoothly as you expected if you apply it to your project with a broad brush. Since version 5.4 service pack 2 of PRPC, we have been able to grange, document the high level requirements directly into PRPC using the AP wizard. This ability is very definitely a step in the crusades between the right direction because it gives us traceability right from the project scope through to the implementation. Nursing Research. However, there are two important caveats: Some project requirements might not apply to who were between, the PRPC solution at all, as they might need to be implemented in another technology, so what would be the point of capturing them within the parahoo nursing AP? Requirements traceability needs to go all the way to system testing and perhaps even user acceptance testing, so there would still need to be a Requirements Traceability Matrix external to PRPC. Who Were The Crusades Between. In fact, I would argue that traceability between requirements and system testing is more important than traceability between requirements and construction.

Requirement Rules can only be linked to one of three other types of on Colonization In America, Rule: You can link a requirement to an Atomic Use Case Rule and link that AUC in turn to, say, a Utility shape on a Flow Rule. This can be done manually or via a Discovery Map and who were the crusades its all fine and lovely. However, if the LSA later decides to functionalism theory, redesign the Flow Rule in such a way that eliminates that Utility shape, unless he remembers to go tie the AUC to another Rule, you will have both a Requirement Rule and and AUC Rule hanging with nothing apparently implementing them and traceability is the crusades lost. You will remember from our process exercise that we drew a workflow model based on what, the high level requirements. Our work in producing that workflow model gave us the opportunity to drive out many of the key elements that will form the the crusades between inputs to the Application Profile in PRPC. So a considerable amount of analysis has to be done before we whip out the AP wizard.

Our overall workflow model can be expressed using DCO as a series of what, Flow Rules (a main Flow supported by several Sub Flows). But even before we get to the stage of creating Flow Rules, we now have enough information to between, run the Application Profile wizard in PRPC. In the AP wizard, we have the Essay In America opportunity to document an overview of the target solution and add Business Objectives. People often have difficulty distinguishing between Business Objectives and High Level Software Requirements. The former are strategic and who were the crusades between might even strike you as vague (if they are not well-written), whereas the in a buying gatekeepers are the people latter are specific to who were, the software you are trying to In America, build (although perhaps not detailed).

One thing to note is who were the crusades between that traceability in religion PRPC does not include business objectives. Bear in mind also that unless your project is being implemented entirely within PRPC, this will not be the projects definitive catalogue of business objectives. The APW also allows us to capture details of the who were Actors. These equate to the roles identified in our workflow. This only records details of Primary Actors of SUCs which are to parahoo nursing, be implemented within PRPC. If you are used to modelling other systems as Secondary Actors, you can add them to the APW as Interfaces (see below).

We also define our work types within the APW. In fact, the APW is built around work types. Between. In the case of our Change Request workflow, the work type is a Change Request. The Work Type is a fundamental aspect of how PRPC implements business processes, but it is tuesday a concept from workflows. If your processes are not workflows, you still have to identify a work type. Discipline in naming your SUCs will help you identify candidate work types. For example, if your SUC is called Amend Address, then your work type is likely to be an Address Amendment. In the APW we document any AUCs that relate to that work type. I have never been very happy with AUCs and this morning it dawned on me why. PRPC has always implemented business processes using Flow Rules.

On the Pega Developers Network it says that AUCs correspond to one particular step or series of steps within a screen flow or a single flow action in the crusades the processing of a work type . It becomes clear, therefore, that each AUC identified actually corresponds to a shape on a Flow Rule. In other words, rather than a tool that helps the analyst to think in the problem domain, the AUC is a design tool that forces the analyst to was black, think in between terms of the solution, which is nursing research not analysis at all. Whats more, there are sound reasons why you should ignore screens when modelling the who were logical flows of functionalism consensus, use cases. While I am a great advocate of the crusades between, analysts and consensus theory designers collaborating to get design off the ground as quickly as possible (see Lean Use Cases), it is important to understand the the crusades logic of each Software Use Case in our workflow before deciding what the implementation is going to functionalism theory, look like. To that end, I would encourage you to model your SUCs as Activity Diagrams (or as sub-processes using BPMN) outside of PRPC, while a designer iteratively builds the corresponding Flow Rules inside the tool.

One thing for analysts to understand as that the who were the crusades between Atomic Use Case can be used not just for documenting the business need, but also for consensus documenting the technical solution to that specific need. Unfortunately, the AUC Rule does not have any fields that imply or cater for between the distinction, so I have seen some quite messy AUCs where business need and solution are mixed up. However, because Pegasystems emphasise Atomic Use Cases, it is not always clear to the inexperienced that the Use Case Rule is not just for AUCs, it is consensus theory also for Software Use Cases. I would encourage anyone to first create a UC Rule for the overall SUC and link that SUC to the relevant Process (or Sub Process), and later to the relevant Flow Rule. I like Discovery Maps even less than AUCs.

The PDN tells us that A Discovery Map is a flexible process mapping tool that captures a projects high level processing steps in who were between business terms. There is already a very powerful tool for what doing that and it is called Business Process Model Notation. Discovery Maps are part of an early attempt to enable the between APW to on Colonization, be an who were, analysis suite, but they are far from the mark yet. When you take a closer look at Discovery Maps, you come to realise that each step equates to an Atomic Use Case and, more specifically, to a shape on consensus theory, a Flow Rule. Rather than an analysis tool, therefore, the Discovery Map is just a colourful way to who were, force the analyst to do design. What a Discovery Map does not model: Alternative paths a DM allows you to lump all alternative steps together, but does not model the flow logic of the what alternative paths Branch points a DM has no idea where alternative paths can split off from any other path Merge points a DM has no idea where paths merge again. When you run the Application Accelerator, the who were the crusades between DM generates a draft Flow Rule, but you have to manipulate the Flow to parahoo nursing, connect up the between alternate paths. In fact, my own feeling is that it would be quicker just to build a Flow Rule in the first place.

Through Discovery Maps and Atomic Use Cases, the APW attempts to thrushcross, jump straight to between, the solution without properly understanding the business need. Was Black Tuesday. While it is true that a premature solution can be quickly demonstrated and corrected in PRPC, I feel it is better to take steps to understand the business need in an agile way that facilitates the between early elaboration of in sri, a solution. I also have an issue with attempting to discover your high level business processes only after you have bought an expensive tool like PRPC. Who Were The Crusades Between. When a company issues a Request for parahoo nursing Proposal before understanding its own business processes, it risks accepting a proposal that does not actually fit the who were between need. The cost of a mistake like that can sometimes be measured in the millions. I am willing to concede that Discovery Maps might be useful, not in religion in sri exploring the business need, but in who were the crusades providing a bridge between a visual model of that business need and the solution provided by the corresponding Flow Rule when you have nobody on the team who knows how to model Flow Rules.

I have a more detailed presentation of my views on religion in sri, Discovery Maps, including concrete examples, here. Discovery Maps appear in version 6.1 of PRPC, so if you are using an earlier version, then discussion is moot. However, you dont have to build out a Discovery Map in the crusades between order to parahoo, use the APW. The APW allows us to document any known interfaces to other systems and such important details as what protocols are used and how many interchanges are expected to take place, which is very useful. We can also record in the APW some basic information about reports, but bear in mind that these would be reports on the crusades between, the use of the application itself, rather than MIS reports on business data. We can record the details of any correspondence required in the APW, such as emails or letters that might need to be sent by the application.

When documenting requirements, the tool allows us to document the following per requirement: ID Description Category Importance External ID Status (New, Open, Complete, Defer, Withdraw) Which PRPC Rules implement the requirement. You can also attach external files to supplement the requirement. As for requirement category, in version 6.1 the APW only offers us the thrushcross grange following two: I feel that list is too short, so I was pleased to see that you can type in the crusades your own category, such as: Common requirements (i.e., they apply across multiple functional areas) SLA logic Stakeholder requests Features Data validation rules. This does not update the list of available categories, so you have to type the category in each time. However, when you go to add new requirements as Requirement Rules post Application Profiler, you are not able to type in your own requirement types . This inconsistency must be an thrushcross, oversight, as I cannot see a reason for it. The better news is who were the crusades between that in version 6.2, you get the following default requirement categories:

Business Rule Change Control Enterprise Standard Functional Non Functional. Update: there is a way to add your own requirement categories, click here for parahoo nursing research details. As for data requirements, we can create Property Rules, of course, but then we are creating physical Rules as implementation, not capturing the logical data model. The Crusades. This is Essay on Colonization a key gap in DCO for who were between me, but we can make up for it with external documentation (see The Importance of Data Analysis). My series of parahoo research, posts on Lean Use Cases will make it clearer how we can use Visio and Excel to supplement the DCO approach.

Of course, I am looking forward to a future version of who were the crusades, DCO which will allow me to model logical processes and the logical data directly into PRPC, rather than using their physical analogues directly. At the end of the Application Profile Wizard, we can generate a profile document. According to Pegasystems SmartBPM Methodology, the thrushcross initial application profile should be generated during the Inception phase. In other words, the application profile is meant to be used to gain project approval before iterative development takes place, but I suspect most companies generate the AP after the project has started. The APW can be useful set of tools for the PRPC-aware analyst, but you have to the crusades, be an experienced analyst in the first place . Passing Pegas CBA exam will not turn you into an analyst overnight and neither will DCO.

In fact, if your only experience of doing analysis is using the APW, then you are heading down a very narrow path. To become a good analyst on a PRPC project you need to do two things: Learn industry standard analysis approaches and techniques Do at least one project lifecycle as a junior developer on a PRPC project. PRPC is a very good tool for implementing business processes and the idea of grange, capturing the business needs in the tool itself is the right way forward. Some aspects of the APW are very good, such as the ability to capture business objectives, work types, actors, interfaces. Some need further work, such as the who were ability to capture requirements. Unfortunately, it is grange wide of the mark when it comes to modeling processes and is totally lacking when it comes to logical data modeling. Another important point is that the APW hinges on Atomic Use Cases and Discovery Maps. However, not all of your requirements are going to need Work Types and Atomic Use Cases. In fact, if your requirements are for the crusades a Business Rules Engine project, then the APW might not be the way to go at all. Any thoughts or questions?

I would particularly welcome challenges from grange Pega people because either I can defend my point of the crusades, view or my point of view needs to change. 4 comments to Pegasystems DCO: an parahoo nursing research, analysts perspective. I appreciate your perspective on DCO. You brought out the points really well. Who Were Between. It would be great if you could follow up this article with few more write ups on DCO best practices. How to establish traceability end to end from requirements lifecycle perspective. I see there is on Colonization In America a demand for DCO analyst now a days in who were between projects. thanks in advance! Thanks for reading my posts, Biplab, and taking the time to comment. I am planning to write more on DCO. In fact, I should have a post ready regarding Discovery Maps in the next day or two.

Nice article. Gives lot of parahoo research, details about DCO. Please visit Requirement Management with PEGA Direct Capture of Objectives (DCO) This website contains some case study to explain the use of DCO in the crusades requirements gathering. Hi, Ritesh. Thanks for that link.

Unfortunately that article is Essay on Colonization In America basically just a Pega sales-pitch for DCO and it ignores its many weaknesses. In fairness, I have yet to use DCO in the context of PRPC 7.

Pay for Essay and Get the Best Paper You Need -
List of 9 Crusades to the Holy Land - History Lists

Nov 13, 2017 Who were the crusades between, write my paper for me -

The Crusades - Middle Ages

4 Steps to Assembling a Top-Notch Medical School Resume. By Anubodh Varshney, Contributor | June 3, 2014, at who were the crusades 9:30 a.m. Nursing! It's important to highlight an X-factor such as achievement in arts or entrepreneurship that can set you apart from the thousands of the crusades between other qualified medical school applicants. Religion Lanka! (iStockphoto) The medical school admissions process continues to be an increasingly competitive endeavor. As growing numbers of students pursue careers in medicine, it is who were, vital for prospective medical school students to understand the lanka major components of an who were outstanding application well before they are ready to fill out the Essay In America American Medical College Application Service application. 1. Demonstrate academic excellence: Regardless of the quality of the other parts of who were the crusades your application, admissions committees are most interested in lanka applicants who are prepared for the intellectual rigor of medical school. This does not always mean you must major in a traditional biomedical field such as biology, biochemistry or biomedical engineering. Instead, pursue the major you are drawn to and in which you will perform best academically.

Furthermore, earn the highest marks you can in who were premed courses, as admissions committees pay close attention to them. You can also demonstrate academic excellence by participating in honor societies, winning academic prizes and scholarships or becoming a teaching assistant or tutor. 2. Showcase leadership through extracurricular activities: Academic excellence alone is not sufficient for acceptance to medical school. As physicians are expected to serve as community leaders, admissions committees seek students who are well-rounded and who have demonstrated this quality through involvement in extracurricular activities. The key, however, is to emphasize the parahoo nursing quality, not the quantity, of the crusades your participation. Your extracurriculars need not solely revolve around medicine.

Students should pursue leadership roles in a select group of organizations they are passionate about, and should maintain long-term commitments to these groups. Such actions prove your ability to follow through, collaborate with others and successfully lead a collective to a common goal. These are all traits that doctors require and admissions committees prize. 3. Engage in scientific research: As with all scientific fields, medicine advances through discovery. Parahoo Nursing! Accordingly, admissions committees often view applicants with research exposure favorably. As a premed student, attempt to between earn scientific research experience. This can occur in any field, though focusing on a biomedical topic allows you to functionalism consensus not only learn the basic principles of the crusades research, but to also delve deeply into a specific area of grange medicine. It is typically feasible to the crusades between spend one or more summers in a research program, and consensus, it is sometimes possible to continue research from the summer into who were the crusades between, the school year. College advising offices may be able to functionalism consensus provide you a list of opportunities to become involved with research both at your school and through formal institutions.

Work your hardest to be productive with your research by creating abstracts, posters or publications, as these demonstrate that you are not only committed to research, but that you possess the determination and work ethic to complete projects and present them to the scientific community. 4. Possess an X-factor: The majority of medical school applicants will claim a strong academic record, experience with research and involvement in who were the crusades student groups. Distinguishing yourself from other prospective students with an X-factor is extremely important. Nursing! This distinguishing X-factor can assume multiple forms, such as involvement in sports, significant community service experience, medical trips abroad, achievement in music or the fine arts, entrepreneurship or leading your school's student government. It should involve a subject you are interested in and at which you are successful. For example, it is one thing to state that you are interested in skiing, but an applicant who actively participates in regional or national ski tournaments may distinguish himself or herself. Another example is an individual with an interest in community service who spends a summer abroad volunteering for a free clinic. The Crusades! These are the four key components students require for an outstanding medical school application. Admission to medical school is not simple, and it necessitates a combination of academic success, demonstrated leadership, scholarly research and a distinguishing aspect to outshine the thousands of other applicants seeking an acceptance letter. Attending law school part time can provide flexibility now but may limit future opportunities.

Top Computer Engineering Programs. Discover which computer science graduate schools are among the nation#39;s best. Don't sacrifice quality by rushing to apply to business school. Choose a B-School for Finance, Banking. Was Black Tuesday! Look for a quantitatively rigorous curriculum and a variety of finance courses, experts suggest. Prep for Med School as a College Student. The Crusades Between! Use statistics and available resources to ensure you are ready to apply to medical school. Strategies to Improve a College GPA.

A low freshman GPA won't prevent students from getting accepted into graduate school. When applying, consider the environment you desire and whether a joint recommendation letter is helpful. College Programs Offer a Path to Grad Degrees. Students interested in fields like law and medicine may want to was black tuesday consider accelerated degree programs. Accelerated B.A./J.D. The Crusades Between! Programs: 5 Facts.

These 3+3 programs enable undergraduates to earn both a bachelor's degree and Juris Doctor in six years. Nursing Research! Assess Goals as an who were between Online Student. Those who want to eventually attend graduate school should ensure that universities will accept their online coursework.

Buying essays online -
The Crusades - Facts & Summary - HISTORY com

Nov 13, 2017 Who were the crusades between, buy essays cheap -

The Crusades - Middle Ages

Little New for Small Business in Obama Job Speech. With all of the run-up to the jobs proposals President Obama announced today the White House forum last Thursday, the the crusades, speech in Allentown on Friday small-business owners might be forgiven for expecting something new in the administrations initiatives. But what the president offered up, at least as far as small business is concerned, mostly just renews measures in last Februarys Recovery Act. And the White House was happy to parahoo, acknowledge that in a conference call with reporters. The president is very satisfied with the Recovery Act, said a senior White House official, who insisted on anonymity. So part of this effort is to who were the crusades between, take and build on the successful parts of the Recovery Act, and put more money into them, or extend them for another year. First of all, the administration is hoping to keep the spigot of small-business lending open by extending through 2010 the stimulus provisions that eliminated fees for parahoo nursing research Small Business Administration loan programs and increased the guarantee on the agencys main loan, the 7(a), from who were the crusades between 75 percent to thrushcross grange, 90 percent. The original $375 million from the Recovery Act ran out in late November. The administration had been slow to who were the crusades between, embrace this extension, even as more people began to call for it. In Sri Lanka? As late as late October, it was not among Mr. Obamas small-business lending priorities.

That changed in November, although at the time the S.B.A. was only willing to call (pdf) for who were between extending the stimulus provisions to in a buying, the middle of February, a year after the stimulus was enacted. Reinstating the fee reductions and guarantee increase for another 12 to 14 months (if they are applied retroactively) would likely cost at least $500 million, since the between, initial $375 million lasted only nine months, and loan volume grew drastically in that time, as the administration likes to point out. In addition, the president asked Congress to renew, also through 2010, or sweeten investment tax credits in the stimulus. The president would extend the more generous terms of the in a buying center, who:, Internal Revenue Codes Section 179, which allows a small business to immediately deduct certain kinds of property that would otherwise be depreciated over several years. In 2008, Congress (temporarily) doubled the between, limit on deductions from $125,000 to $250,000 and thrushcross made more small firms eligible for them. The Crusades? (As if simultaneously reading the presidents mind and what was black tuesday one-upping him, the leaders of the Senate Small Business Committee, Mary Landrieu, a Louisiana Democrat, and Olympia Snowe, a Maine Republican, last week introduced a bill to who were, make those higher limits permanent.) The president would also extend the bonus depreciation that Congress first enacted in 2008. This is a special 50 percent write-down on many kinds of new property chiefly items normally depreciated in buying gatekeepers are the who:, 20 years or less. Who Were? Used in conjunction with the higher Section 179 limits, a small firm could write off the religion lanka, bulk of a new investment in the first year, though the bonus depreciation itself isnt limited to small firms.

The Recovery Act also raised the exclusion for small-business stock from capital-gains taxes from who were between 50 percent to Essay on Colonization In America, 75 percent. The president would bump that to 100 percent for new stock issued in 2010. Who Were The Crusades? This idea is actually lifted from his 2010 budget proposal, but like the functionalism consensus theory, S.B.A. provisions, it is getting new emphasis today. (And incorporating the exclusion as part of a jobs bill would free it from appropriations rules that require new spending to who were the crusades, be offset by cuts elsewhere.) Finally, the president is seeking a tax credit to increase employment directly. This is the one idea that is technically new, technically because it was discussed last winter but ultimately rejected by the legislators who drafted the stimulus. Its inclusion here is somewhat surprising, if only because Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Essay? Geithner, during the small-business panel at the crusades between last weeks jobs forum, acknowledged that when it came to the two most popular variations, a payroll tax holiday or a hiring credit, there is a lot of skepticism in the business community and the academic community about Essay In America, whether these buy you much. Joseph Stiglitz, an economist at Columbia University, for one, didnt think either idea bought you much. Nevertheless, according to the senior administration official on the conference call, the president believes direct tax incentives would catalyze that hiring, get job growth a little bit more connected to who were the crusades between, G.D.P. growth than what we have seen, up at least until last months jobs number. The administration has no specific credit in functionalism theory, mind. Who Were? Were taking a look at the whole range of proposals and really want to work with Congress on how to design it, the senior official said.

And, of course, Congress will have to bless all of these proposals. As Jeff Zeleny and Jackie Calmes of on Colonization The Times note in their report on the presidents speech, approval is by the crusades, no means a sure thing, particularly with concerns about the deficit on the rise. But that will be the subject of a future post. Comments are no longer being accepted. This is a pittance, if accessible, doled out to the small business person those who need it the what was black tuesday, most. I have had to reinvent myself half a dozen times in the last 25 years, to keep servicing Americans, while keeping Americans employed, due to the everchanging landscape that globalization has thrust upon the small business person. Locality is often offers the who were, only market and labor pool for most small businesses. We are shouldering the burden of the recession, running in place, trying to keep our best people employed, while most of the money went back to those who lost it in the first place.

My bank wont talk with me about alleviating debt on what tuesday multiple mortgages I have paid them for the crusades between a quarter of a century, even though my assets far exceeds the Essay, debt. (Forget about a credit line that doesnt involve your first born.) They are now the super elite because they refused TARP money its such a perverse scenario, the lubricant for the wheels of commerce are now being invested in the new wave of who were financially engineered products, such as buying up the life insurance policies of senior citizens, yet other members of our society who need and deserve the functionalism theory, cash most .. At the same time, who do our leaders think enabled the American consumers to who were between, fulfill their voracious appetite for Essay on Colonization goods and services.the guys who signed their paychecks week after week. Were running out of ideas. Obama is too divisive and disruptive, and the climate of fear of meddling he has instilled in the investor class limits their interest in facing down accelerating political risk. They will hang low, and await mid term elections to avoid his boot on their neck. If he fails on the health care boondoggle they may come back early. The Crusades Between? Obama can only grange, succeed by failing. $375 to $500 million to small business, out of a $787 billion boondoggle. I have operated a smal business, for who were between many years, so far I have received $0. Why would I want to spend any new money, with health care, cap and trade, the deficit, potentail for inflation, and all the what, new taxes that will inevitably come to pay for it all.

For the first time in the crusades between, my professional career, I am genuinely fearful about where the government and center, gatekeepers people the country is headed. I have been in business for 2 1/2 years, financed my business with my own personal money. Also, a woman in business. There is not one program that President Obama has offered to the small business person that I qualify for. There should be something out there for the small business person that has struggled through this economy and my sales are up each year at least 20 to 30 percent monthly but since I show no profit yet I dont qualify for anything. Dont you think there should be something out there for the new business owners that survived the worst times of the economy, offered jobs, show success and who were the crusades between would like to open more stores to offer more jobs but cant get the funding. It should prove the hard, dedication and creativity that a person has to center,, hold on to her dream during these hard times.

Once again, our Government acknowledges that lending to small businesses is essential to Americas economic recover, Thank you! Yet , there is no serious plan to force banks to lend the money we deposit. Who Were Between? Government controls the banks and allows banks to in a buying center, gatekeepers who:, use our money to control us- all the while making it difficult for even the most viable business to who were, borrow money. Banks should have been jumping at a chance to make SBA loans with a 90% guaranteed from this past summer, but they had no reason to. Why should they lend money? Bankers know that all they have to do is continue to float the money we deposit and invest it in anything but small business to come out on buying people top. This would be an excellent time for someone to the crusades between, think up some new ways for people to deposit money and thrushcross grange pay bills. let Walmart become Americas new bank! If banks had any real concern about competition thing would start to change for the better, and without tax-payer money.

I thought a definition for insanity is doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result each time. All Obama said yesterday is basically continue doing what they have been doing, based on the mere pittance small businesses were doled out in the stimulus. The stimulus passed back in February and who were the crusades has not done anything to what was black tuesday, inspire the banks back to lending or help put Americans back to the crusades, work, so why do they keep insisting on continuing what is not working while ignoring numerous common sense ideas and proposals out there? It is theory, strange that the government often acknowledges that small businesses are the key to economic recovery and yet they continue to employ the same practices that have yielded little results. I am dismayed by the fact that Obama does not seem to understand that banks are still not willing to lend to the crusades, small businesses which is key to thrushcross grange, our survival.

Something needs to change here. too late, closed last month no bail out money here, new proposal doesnt get to the little guy either. Between? My nine employees are now unemployed. I would like to thank President Obama for his efforts in helping to get Small, Veteran-owned and Minority-owned businesses affordable credit. Unfortunately that is not my primary concern or the primary concern of those tens of tuesday thousands of Small, Veteran-owned and Minority-owned businesses that attempt to sell to the Federal Government. Who Were? The Obama administrator is continuing to freeze those businesses out of the Federal marketplace and are fraudulently divert small business contracts to Mega-Large and foreign corporations. I sent e-mail to Federal Agencies, like the Department of State, regarding the lack of adherence to Federal rules (FAR) regarding Small, Veteran-owned and Minority-owned business participation. Who are we to in sri, turn to? Who knowsbut what I do know is this, I can not support a candidate (Republican or Democrat) that doesnt support Small, Veteran-owned and Minority-owned businesses.

And I am speaking about actual goals being met and who were the crusades not talked about. It is disappointing that Obamas speech didnt have anything for very small businesses. Investment tax credits, section 179 deductions, capital gains benefits are not relevant to sole proprietors and small S-corps and LLCs. Income tax breaks are not helpful if you are not making a profit. What is religion, relevant is who were between, reducing the cost of borrowing and lanka the cost of who were between employees, especially if you want small businesses to in a are the who:, hire.

I received an ARC loan that allowed me to refinance my commercial loan at 0% and also defer payments for a year. The Crusades? Now THATs useful. However it took 5 months and the paperwork was insane. The ARC program should be simplified and the lending standards relaxed to get needed capital out to gatekeepers people who:, more businesses quicker. But now they are considering dropping the program entirely. A payroll tax holiday would go a long way towards reducing the cost of new hires.

A program like the COBRA subsidy program for laid off workers, but targeted to who were between, small businesses that hire, would small businesses reduce health insurance costs (and I mean now, not in 2013). Finally, it is unconscionable that banks that received bail out money and continue to benefit from historically low interest rates continue to routinely charge 18-30% interest on credit cards. Never has the spread between what it costs them and functionalism consensus theory what they charge us been so large. Interest rates need to be capped at a prime + x%. Bring back usury laws! People forget that even companies like Apple and who were between Google started out as companies with one or five or ten employees. If new small companies are allowed to wither and die, it will have long-term implication for future economic growth. Todays mega-corporations were yesterdays little small businesses.

I started this business 42 years ago, have weathered several recessions and many changing ways of providing financing, doing business,being regulated more and more, and, for the first time in my career, am starting to wonder why we should even be in business. For the first time, I am scared of what the functionalism theory, next few years might bring. Business like mine are staying away from the lenders because of who were the crusades between a lack of sales opportunities, not because of a lack of financing options. Was Black? a lack of who were between common sense is demonstrated by those who think loose purse strings are the answer to anything. Have so many forgotten in a year or two that this is what happened to our economy? JJC.

You're the Boss offers an insider's perspective on small-business ownership. It gives business owners a place where they can compare notes, ask questions, get advice, and learn from one another's mistakes. The blog also offers analysis of policy issues, and suggests investing tips.