Date: 4.25.2017 / Article Rating: 5 / Votes: 3660
Evs.smartwritingservice.4pu.com #What is positive peer pressure

Recent Posts

Home >> Uncategorized >> What is positive peer pressure

Essay Writer for All Kinds of Papers - what is positive peer pressure

Nov/Mon/2017 | Uncategorized



How to buy essay cheap with no worries -
Positive Peer Pressure: Definition, Facts &…

Nov 13, 2017 What is positive peer pressure, write my essay -

Peer Pressure Examples - YourDictionary

AP Book Report: A Tale of is positive peer Two Cities, by Charles Dickens. Essay by Essay_Jin , High School, 10th grade , A+ , December 2005. 1. Title of of being Work: A Tale of Two Cities. 2. Author and what peer pressure date written: Charles Dickens; written in 1859, London, Published in weekly serial form between April 20, 1859, and November 26, 1859. 3. Country of author: London, England. 4. Characters (label as major or minor) with brief descriptions of each; include at least two adjectives for say no to drug each and brief commentary. - Charles Darnay (originally in the Evremonde family): The protagonist of the novel.

He is a French aristocrat by birth. He rejects his inheritance and his title, wanting to earn an honest living as a tutor in England. He marries Lucie Manette. He is accused during the French Revolution, but is saved by Carton taking his place at the guillotine. - Dr. Alexandre Manette: A French doctor who is imprisoned for pressure eighteen years in Bastille by the Marquis St. Evremonde.

He is later rescued, and brought back to life by his daughter, Lucie. - Lucie Manette/Darnay: The daughter of Dr. Manetter, described as beautiful by both Carton and Darnay. She marries Charles Darnay. She gets along with everyone, and evreryone she meets show love and Essay on Racism Barriers the American Dream greetings to her. - Sydney Carton: Looks almost identical to Charles Darnay in appearance. He drinks a lot and gets drunk often.

He also loved Lucie Manette. He is is positive peer pressure, a man of courage and word and shows it by replacing Charles Darnay and dying himself on the guillotine. Say No To Drug? - Madame Defarge: Wife of Monsieur Defarge. She is cruel, embittered, and a vengeful woman. She knitted the names of the people who are to die in the revolution. She represents the bloody and violent aspect of the what pressure revolution. - Monsieur Defarge: Husband of Madam Defarge.

A wine seller in Paris. He was a servant of Dr. Manette and. Firm Mean? AP Book Report: A Tale of Two Cities, by Charles Dickens.. (2005, December 01). In WriteWork.com.

Retrieved 02:23, October 03, 2017, from what is positive peer http://www.writework.com/essay/ap-book-report-tale-two-cities-charles-dickens. WriteWork contributors. AP Book Report: A Tale of Two Cities, by Charles Dickens. WriteWork.com. WriteWork.com, 01 December, 2005. Web.

03 Oct. Business? 2017. WriteWork contributors, AP Book Report: A Tale of Two Cities, by is positive peer pressure, Charles Dickens., WriteWork.com, http://www.writework.com/essay/ap-book-report-tale-two-cities-charles-dickens (accessed October 03, 2017) On Monsieur's Departure, with its highly interpretive nature and use of firm mean strong themes and appropriate literary devices, expresses the inner turmoil of its author, Queen Elizabeth, to the reader. The basic concept of this 17th century poem is one of the divided passions of Queen Elizabeth. . 5 pages 58 1 Mar/2004 5.0. A Tale Of Two Cities (Charles Dickens) Dr.

Alexandre Manette Dr. Alexandre Manette the great survivor of the peer Bastille and father to Lucie Manette. Dr.Manette is the most important character in the book. Throughout the book he is the stories backbone. Few subplots ignore Manette. Dr. Unemployment Among Graduates? Manette loves . What Peer? 2 pages 81 2 Jan/1994 3.3. A Tale of Two Cities is one of Charles Dickens' most favoured novels that brings out the spirit of the late eighteen century and of being the outbreak of the is positive peer French Revolution. The book opens in the year 1775 by Education, contrasting Paris and London in the best of times and the worst of times (p.

3). The . 6 pages 50 Apr/2004 5.0. . Charles Dickens' novel, Hard Times, is a story of two struggles--the struggle of fact versus imagination and peer the struggle between two classes. It takes place in Essay Native American, Coketown, and industrial-age English city. Is Positive Pressure? The novel is divided into two sections. One deals with the struggle of upper class members of . 1 pages 98 1 Feb/1996 4.7. . of it only to his wife and to his closest friend, John Forster -- but the dark secret became a source both of creative energy themes of alienation and betrayal which would emerge, most notably, in the likeness of being, David Copperfield.

In 1892 he became a free-lance reporter at Doctor . Is Positive? 2 pages 57 1 Mar/1997 5.0. Charles Dickens?s Great expectations. . of riding himself of thinking of work) she really enjoyed it, and she had thought about the same things that I presented Charles Dickens's Great expectations is a story about a boy, Philip Pirrip, who comes to say no to drug a . 3 pages 97 1 Apr/1997 4.8. What Is Positive Peer Pressure? . Cities Charles Dickens has been acclaimed as one of the foremost satirists of the nineteenth century. In his novel A Tale of Two Cities Dickens finds fault with the social structure of the society. A few of these social problems are the difference between the classes, the lunacy of the revolution . 2 pages 89 1 Apr/1997 4.8. Good news: you can turn to other's writing help. WriteWork has over 100,000 sample papers Prof. Jacob Leland, Phd. I turned what i thought was a C+ paper into an A- Dawn S., college student.

CNN WIRED EveningTimes Sony NPR Independent The Boston Globe The Virginian Pilot. Rutgers University Marist College Boston College Boston University University of Colorado University of Maryland University of Phoenix New York University Indiana University Columbia University Miami Dade College University of Missouri. . Hard Times by Dickens, Structure as it Relates to Essay about Native Education Plot and Characterixation Charles Dickens . 3 pages 6 Feb/2008 0.0. . realist techniques and conventions.' Discuss this claim in relation to is positive peer the novel Great Expectations. . Charles Dickens' Great Expectations uses a variety of these realistic . 7 pages 20 Jun/2009 0.0. 'Love and say no to drug hatred' in 'A Tale of Two Cities' . relationships and conflicts between the what is positive pressure Manettes, Defarge, Carton and Evremonde, Charles Dickens . 4 pages 8 Jan/2008 0.0. The Role of Essay about Education Women in A Tale of Two Cities. . Charles Dickens's novel A Tale of Two Cities is a story of . 4 pages 25 Nov/2005 0.0. . Hard Times by Dickens, Structure as it Relates to Plot and Characterixation Charles Dickens .

Peer Pressure Has a Positive Side - Scientific…

What is positive peer pressure

Write My Essay : 100% Original Content -
Encourage positive peer pressure - ReachOut…

Nov 13, 2017 What is positive peer pressure, order essay and get it on time -

Peer Pressure Examples - YourDictionary

Lorenzaccio, Musset - Fiche de Lecture - Acte par Acte. Lorenzaccio d'Alfred de Musset est une oeuvre qui est souvent ©tudi©e pendant l'ann©e de premi¨re L en vue des ©preuves anticip©es de Fran§ais du Bac. Is Positive Peer! Avec ce r©sum© de Lorenzaccio sc¨ne par sc¨ne , cela vous permettra d'avoir rapidement une id©e globale de l'oeuvre et de l'Histoire. RESUME LORENZACCIO , Alfred de MUSSET (1834) Une nuit, dans un jardin de Florence, Lorenzo et Giomo accompagnent Alexandre de Me ?dicis. About Education! Ils attendent une belle jeune fille que le duc a paye ?e pour aller avec lui au bal de Nasi. Is Positive! Celle-ci se fait attendre, quand son fre#768;re - Maffio - la voit traverser le jardin.

Inquie ?te ? par sa fugue, il la poursuit et tombe nez a#768; nez avec le duc, Giomo et Lorenzo. Essay And Poverty: Barriers! Il leur demande ce que cela signifie. What Peer Pressure! Il les menace de rapporter les faits au duc puis les attaque a#768; l’e ?pe ?e. Native American Education! Rapidement contro#770;le ?, il apprend qu’il s’agit du duc en personne. What Pressure! Ils ache#768;tent son silence et repartent. A travers les conversations des passants (le marchand, l’orfe#768;vre, le couple de bourgeois, les e ?coliers. Say No To Drug! ), on is positive peer apprend qu’au petit matin, le bal masque ? des noces de la fille des Nasi bat encore son plein.

Les grands seigneurs et le duc y sont pre ?sents. Essay On Racism Barriers Dream! Leur train de vie est extravagant : costumes superbes, de ?bauche, fe#770;tes monumentales et alcoolise ?es. Peer! Ceci contraste avec la vie du peuple : pauvrete ?, travail, re ?voltes contre les seigneurs et contre l’emprise allemande. Unemployment Graduates! En fin de sce#768;ne, Julien Salviati harce#768;le Louise Strozzi, qui de ?cline son offre. Le marquis de Cibo fait ses adieux a#768; sa femme, son fils et son fre#768;re : il part a#768; Massa.

La marquise est triste de ce de ?part, tant elle est amoureuse. What! Le marquis parti, elle se retrouve avec le cardinal de Cibo. Native American! Ils discutent du bal des Nasi et tre#768;s vite, la marquise montre son aversion pour le duc, qu’elle de ?crit comme un tyran provocateur. Peer Pressure! Lorsqu’elle sort, le cardinal appelle le page ( Agnolo ) de celle-ci. About American Education! Contraint, il lui tend une lettre (du duc) destine ?e a#768; la marquise. Is Positive Peer! On apprend que le duc lui fait la cour depuis deux mois et qu’elle est partie le rejoindre, malgre ? le discours qu’elle a tenu. Le duc est dans une des cours de son palais, il est rejoint par le cardinal Valori et Sire Maurice.

Ceux-ci font part au duc des nouvelles du pape. Walmart Business! Ce dernier pense que Lorenzo est un mauvais personnage pour le gouvernement. Is Positive Peer Pressure! Il n’a qu’un seul ro#770;le : de ?baucher le duc, mais celui-ci n’adhe#768;re pas a#768; cette ide ?e. Say No To Drug! Lorsque Lorenzo les rejoint, Sire Maurice le provoque et le duc ame#768;ne les deux hommes a#768; se battre a#768; l’e ?pe ?e. Peer! Lorenzo, apeure ? et mauvais soldat prend peur et fait un malaise. Essay About American Education! Le duc intervient alors en expliquant qu’il a p ousse ? le vice pour leur montrer que Lorenzo n’est pas un mauvais garc#807;on. Des passants discutent a#768; Montolivet (lieu de foire). What Peer! Lors de leurs e ?changes, un bourgeois s’indigne de la politique (arbitraire et absolue) du duc et de son comportement, alors qu’il n’est pas de sang royal (ba#770;tard). Firm Mean! Deux dames de la cour, chez le marchand, demandent a#768; leurs officiers d’aller chercher Julien Salviati. Peer Pressure! Entre alors le prieur de Capoue, puis Salviati (les dames sont parties entre- temps).

Celui-ci aperc#807;oit Louise Strozzi et raconte au prieur que cette femme est d’accord pour coucher avec lui. Essay About Native American Education! Le prieur - fre#768;re de Louise - s’offusque et s’en va . Marie Soderini et Catherine Ginori sont sur les bords de l’Arno. What Is Positive Pressure! La me#768;re de Lorenzo , qui a eu vent de son malaise (Acte I, sc.4), s’inquie#768;te de son avenir. Essay On Racism! Elle relate a#768; Catherine que son fils e ?tait (avant de partir a#768; Florence) tre#768;s avenant et juste avec la volonte ? d’aider tout le monde. What Is Positive Peer! Elle le voit maintenant comme un homme corrompu, vil et malhonne#770;te. Say No To Drug! Elles sont remplace ?es par un groupe de bannis de Florence; Maffio les a rejoint (cf.

Acte I, sc.1). What Pressure! On apprend que Philippe Strozzi est un fervent de ?fenseur d’une Florence libre et saine et qu’il lutte pour la chute du duc. Acte II, sce#768;ne 1. Philippe Strozzi, seul, regrette de laisser la corruption envahir la ville et bannir ses e ?le ?ments. Native Education! Pierre et Le ?on Strozzi (le prieur de Capoue) entrent. Peer! Le ?on est accable ? par ce qu’il vient d’entendre a#768; Montolivet ; Pierre le voit et lui demande ce qu’il se passe. Business Practices! Avec appre ?hension il explique qu’il a entendu Salviati, dire qu’il allait coucher avec leur sœur (Louise) et qu’elle e ?tait consentante. Is Positive Peer! Pierre est dans tous ses e ?tats : il de ?teste Salviati. Acte II, sce#768;ne 2. Lorenzo et Valori sont devant une e ?glise.

Valori fait un e ?loge de la beaute ? de cette e ?glise, lorsque Tebaldeo Freccia les interrompt. Say No To Drug! Ce dernier, qui porte un tableau, est un modeste amoureux des arts. What Is Positive! Valori lui propose de venir travailler au palais. Unemployment Among Graduates In Malaysia! Lorenzo, un peu provocateur, lui demande de montrer son travail (tableau). What Is Positive Pressure! Valori remarque le charme du tableau et Loren zo, lui, se moque de son œuvre et lui propose de peindre une courtisane. Unemployment! L’artiste refuse, Lorenzo le pousse dans ses retranchements en lui demandant d’expliquer son refus.

Tebaldeo explique. ensuite que l’e ?tat de de ?solation de Florence, cre ?e de grands artistes ; il aime Florence et ne la quitterait pour rien au monde (malgre ? la perse ?cution et la corruption qui y re#768;gnent). What Is Positive! Lorenzo lui demande de venir au palais le lendemain pour peindre un tableau pour « ses noces ». Acte II, sce#768;ne 3. Le cardinal Cibo, seul, attend la marquise de Cibo. Firm Mean! Dans son monologue, il fait part de son engagement certain aupre#768;s de Charles Quint et du pape. Is Positive Peer! Aupre#768;s du duc, il fait en sorte d’appliquer les ordres de ces deux autorite ?s. Say No To Drug! Cependant, il se me ?fie de l’influence de la mar quise sur le duc qui la courtise.

La marquise vient se confesser et le cardinal tente de recueillir des informations sur sa relation avec le duc. What! La marquise ne comprend pas son insistance, se fa#770;che et lui reproche de ne pas rester a#768; son ro#770;le de confesseur (il est son beau- fre#768;re). Practices! Pique ? , il s’en va. Is Positive Peer Pressure! La marquise, seule, re ?fle ?chit a#768; cet e ?change et a#768; ses sentiments, quand Agnolo vient lui annoncer l’arrive ?e du duc. Acte II, sce#768;ne 4. Lorenzo, sa me#768;re et sa tante discutent litte ?rature. Business! Bindo et Baptista Venturi les interrompt ; les femmes sortent. What Peer Pressure! L’oncle tente de savoir si Lorenzo - si proche du duc - est encore de leur co#770;te ? (re ?publicain) ou si son jeu de rapprochement lui a tourne ? la te#770;te. The Likeness! En effet, on is positive apprend que Lorenzo est entre ? a#768; la cour du duc afi n de s’e n rapprocher, de renverser le pouvoir et d’amener a#768; une Re ?publique.

Mais ils ne sont plus tre#768;s su#770;rs de ses opinions. Say No To Drug! Lorenzo les rassure sur ses objectifs lorsque le duc parait. What Peer Pressure! Lorenzo pre ?sente son oncle et son ami au duc et lui demande des faveurs pour ces derniers. The Likeness Of Being! Le. duc et Lorenzo, sont seuls et Alexandre avoue avoir fait chavirer la marquise de Cibo. What Pressure! Mais apercevant la tante de Lorenzo, il lui demande de la lui pre ?senter. Firm Mean! Enfin, Lorenzo explique au duc qu’il doit aller chez les Strozzi. Is Positive Pressure! Il lui fait cr oire qu’il va glaner des informations sur des complots, qu’il lui transmettra. Acte II, sce#768;ne 5. Lorenzo, Louise, Le ?on et Philippe Strozzi sont dans leur palais. Say No To Drug! Philippe s’inquie#768;te pour son fils (Pierre) car il est parti tuer Salviati afin de venger leur honneur (suite de l’Acte II, sc.1).

Puis il re ?ite#768;re dans une tirade, la description de Florence : ville ensanglante ?e et corrompue. What Is Positive Pressure! Enfin, Pierre et les fre#768;res Pazzi (Thomas et Franc#807;ois) rentrent et annoncent qu’ils ont tue ? Salviati. Firm Mean! Il reproche ensuite, a#768; son pe#768;re, d’accueillir Lorenzo au palais. What Pressure! Philippe Strozzi mai#770;trise la situation, et propose a#768; Pierre de se cacher pour ne pas e#770;tre puni de son acte. Of Being! Celui-ci refuse, question d’honneur. Acte II, sce#768;ne 6. Tebaldeo est au palais du duc, il fait son portrait. What Is Positive Pressure! Alexandre a quitte ? sa co#770;te de maille pour l’occasion. Business! Tout en discutant, Lorenzo arrive, et empoigne la co#770;te de maille.

Puis il fait mine d’alle r chercher sa guitare proche du puits. Pressure! Tebaldeo a termine ? son portrait, et le duc se rhabille. Business! Mais il ne retrouve plus sa co#770;te de maille. What Pressure! Lorenzo, qui revient avec sa guitare feint de ne plus savoir ou#768; il l’ a pose ? et de ?tourne l’attention du duc en parlant de sa tante. Acte II, sce#768;ne 7. Salviati, agonisant arrive au palais du duc. Essay About American! Il accuse les fre#768;res Strozzi de l’avoir tue ? . What Pressure! Il fait croire au duc, qu’ils l’ont agresse ? car Salviati les avait de ?shonore ?s en disant que le duc e ?tait amoureux de Louise. About! Le. duc veut alors, mettre a#768; mort les fre#768;res Strozzi. Acte III, sce#768;ne 1. Lorenzo s’entrai#770;ne a#768; l’e ?pe ?e avec Scoronconcolo . Peer! Rapidement il se de ?chai#770;ne et Scoronconcolo lui demande la ve ?rite ? sur sa rage.

Lorenzo avoue, qu’il a un ennemi et qu’il va le tuer ici -me#770;me. Say No To Drug! Il demande a#768; Scoronconcolo s’il pourra l’aider dans sa bataille (tenir les mains de l’ennemi), le jour venu. What Is Positive! Celui-ci accepte. Acte III, sce#768;ne 2. Pierre est contrarie ? que Salviati ne soit pas mort. Firm Mean! Il annonce a#768; son pe#768;re qu’il part chez les Pazzi, sie#768;ge de la re ?volte contre le duc. Is Positive! Philippe s’inquie#768;te de l’engagement de son fils et de ce qu’ils ont pre ?pare ? pour faire chuter le duc et mettre en place la re ?publique. Graduates In Malaysia! Soucieux du sort de son fils, Philippe part avec Pierre. Acte III, sce#768;ne 3. Des officiers allemands, sous ordre du duc, ont arre#770;te ? Thomas Strozzi. Is Positive Peer Pressure! Dans la rue, Pierre et Philippe Strozzi les rencontrent.

Pierre qui e ?tait recherche ?, est lui-me#770;me arre#770;te ?. Firm Mean! Ils rejoignent le tribunal des Huit. Philippe, seul dans la rue, pleure ses fils et l’injustice de Florence, lorsque Lorenz o intervient. What Is Positive Peer! Philippe lui demande s’il va aller jusqu’au bout et mettre fin au cauchemar engendre ? par les Me ?dicis. Graduates In Malaysia! Philippe, aussi, a constate ? le changement d’attitude de Lorenzo (il n’est plus la personne loyale et juste qu’il e ?tait). What Is Positive Peer Pressure! Ce dernier demande a#768; Philippe de quitter Florence et de ne pas aller chez les Pazzi. Walmart Business Practices! Philippe refuse et Lorenzo le rassure en lui indiquant qu’il va tuer Alexandre. What! Mais il avoue que pour en arriver la#768;, il s’est transforme ? en un homme plein de vices, dont il ne peut, aujourd ’hui, se de ?faire. Essay About Native American Education! Sa soif de justice et de vengeance l’ont de ?route ?. Is Positive Pressure! Le meurtre du duc est le dernier acte qui justifie sa transformation. Firm Mean! Il tente ainsi de montrer a#768; Philippe que la vie de Florence est complexe et peu ide ?ale. What Peer! Lorenzo demande a#768; garder ses confessions secre#768;tes. Acte III, sce#768;ne 4.

Catherine Ginori a rec#807;u une lettre du duc qui lui fait la cour. Unemployment In Malaysia! Dans ce mot, il fait allusion a#768; Lorenzo, son entremetteur. What Is Positive! Quand Marie Soderini entre, Catherine lui montre la lettre qu’elle ne comprend pas. The Likeness! Marie est ane ?antie : elle n’accepte pas que son fils aille jusque-la#768; dans le vice. What Is Positive! Catherine emme#768;ne Marie chez Lorenzo pour plus d’explications. Acte III, sce#768;ne 5. La marquise de Cibo, tre#768;s en beaute ?, attend la venue du duc. Of Being! Le cardinal de Cibo entre et la complimente sur sa tenue. What Pressure! La marquise ne peut le recevoir et lui demande de repasser plus tard.

Seule, elle s’interroge sur le comportement du cardinal (il la surveille). Acte III, sce#768;ne 6. La marquise en compagnie du duc, le pre ?vient de la re ?volte populaire a#768; son e ?gard. Firm Mean! Elle lui demande d’agir pour retrouver la confiance du peuple, malgre ? les ordres de l’empereur Charles Quint. What Pressure! Le duc s’appre#770;te a#768; partir lorsque le cardinal les surprend . Walmart Practices! La marquise, seule, s’adresse a#768; son mari en lui annonc#807;ant son de ?shonneur d’avoir succombe ? au duc. Acte III, sce#768;ne 7. Philippe Strozzi a invite ? sa famille (« les quarante Strozzi ») en son palais. What! Il fait un long discours qui traduit sa volonte ? de vengeance et de justice : il veut mettre fin a#768; la ligne ?e des Me ?dicis, responsables de son chagrin.

Mais, lorsque tous le#768;vent leur verre et boivent, Louise s’effondre. empoisonne ?e. Practices! Philippe est ane ?anti et ne se sent plus en e ?tat d’aller libe ?rer ses fils, il veut fuir. What! Les convives sont side ?re ?es et veulent la mort du duc. Unemployment Among Graduates In Malaysia! Elles tentent en vain de convaincre Philippe de les accompagner, pour venger la mort de Louise.

Acte IV, sce#768;ne 1. Lorenzo et le duc sont dans son palais. Pressure! Le duc apprend la mort de Louise. Essay On Racism And Poverty: Barriers The American! Puis, Lorenzo, demande au duc s’il a retrouve ? sa co#770;te de maille. Is Positive! Celui-ci lui re ?pond que non et qu’il ne p orte rien qui le prote#768;ge. Say No To Drug! Enfin assure ? de sa vulne ?rabilite ?, Lorenzo lui propose un rendez-vous avec sa tante. What Is Positive! La rencontre se fera dans la chambre de Lorenzo. Firm Mean! Ce dernier lui a, en re ?alite ?, donne ? le rendez-vous de sa mort (cf. Pressure! Acte III, sc.1).

Acte IV, sce#768;ne 2. Thomas et Pierre Strozzi, relaxe ?s par le tribunal des Huit, arrivent chez eux. Say No To Drug! Le portier les rec#807;oit et se rend compte qu’ils ne sont pas au courant de la mort de leur sœur. What Pressure! Les moines qui arrivent pour enterrer le corps, leur annoncent le de ?ce#768;s de Louise. The Likeness! Thomas est ane ?anti, Pierre, lui, veut comprendre et rejoindre leur pe#768;re. What Is Positive Peer! Il suspecte une vengeance de la part des Salviati. Acte IV, sce#768;ne 3. Lorenzo pre ?vient Scoronconcolo du rendez-vous du soir. Say No To Drug! Puis, seul, il se demande comment il a pu en arriver a#768; pren dre du plaisir a#768; tuer quelqu’un qui lui a fait de ?couvrir une facette de la vie qui lui e ?tait inconnue et devenir un homme qu’il de ?teste aujourd’hui? Il s’en renvoie a#768; ses croyances, et se pense plus irre ?el qu’humain.

Acte IV, sce#768;ne 4. Chez la marquise de Cibo, le cardinal, lui indique qu’il sait qu’elle est la mai#770;tresse du duc, mais que cela ne rele#768;ve pas de ses confessions: il l’a vu. What Peer! Cependant, le cardinal lui demande de rester proche du duc, de re ?pondre a#768; ses besoins pour conque ?rir son cœur, pluto#770;t que de lui parler politique. The Likeness! Si la marquise re ?ussit a#768; se rapprocher du duc, le cardinal, pense pouvoir en tirer profit (monter en grade). Is Positive Pressure! A cet instant le marquis rentre et le cardinal menace la marquise de tout de ?voiler si elle n’accepte pas de se rapprocher du duc. Firm Mean! Elle de ?cide, finalement, de tout avouer a#768; son mari. Acte IV, sce#768;ne 5. Lorenzo, a#768; l’aide de ses domestiques, arrange sa chambre pour le « faux » rendez-vous. Is Positive Peer! Catherine vient lui annoncer que suite a#768; la lettre du duc, sa me#768;re, Marie, est souffrante. Say No To Drug! Mais incontro#770;lable, Lorenzo, lui demande ce qu’elle a pense ? du mot.

Lorsqu’il se ressaisit il demande a#768; Catherine de rejoindre sa me#768;re. What! Seul, Lorenzo, regrette d’e#770;tre devenu (un peu malgre ? lui) un homme de ?pourvu de vertu. Acte IV, sce#768;ne 6. Philippe Strozzi est en train d’enterrer sa fille lorsque Pierre vient lui annoncer que les bannis se sont regroupe ?s pour aller faire tomber la citadelle (lieu de garde des allemands). Say No To Drug! Il compte sur Philippe pour commander les troupes et les ope ?rations. What Peer! Celui-ci refuse de se battre contre son pays.

Pierre, fa#770;che ?, repart. Acte IV, sce#768;ne 7. Lorenzo pre ?vient les hommes de te#770;te du mouvement re ?publicain, de la mort imminente du duc. Firm Mean! Ils ne le croient pas. Acte IV, sce#768;ne 8.

Pierre Strozzi vient annoncer a#768; deux bannis que son pe#768;re ne viendra pas. What Is Positive Peer Pressure! Mais il faut sa pre ?sence pour que la re ?volte commence. Walmart Business! Les bannis refusent donc de se rendre a#768; Sestino pour annoncer le de ?part, sans l’aval de Philippe . Acte IV, sce#768;ne 9. Lorenzo, dehors, la nuit tombe ?e, re ?fle ?chit a#768; la mise en sce#768;ne de l’assassinat du duc. What Peer! Son monologue est empreint de de ?mence : il passe d’un sujet a#768; l’autre sans aucune logique. Acte IV, sce#768;ne 10. Le duc di#770;ne avec Giomo, lorsqu’entre le cardinal Cibo. Firm Mean! Celui -ci l’interp elle et lui conseille de se me ?fier de Lorenzo qui a annonce ? a#768; plusieurs personnes qu’il tuerait le duc cette nuit. What Is Positive Peer Pressure! Sire Maurice les rejoint, et confirme ces suspicions.

Le duc ne les croit pas. Essay Barriers The American! Lorenzo arrive, et presse le duc pour son rendez- vous. Acte IV, sce#768;ne 11. Lorenzo ame#768;ne le duc dans sa chambre. Is Positive Peer! Celui-ci se couche en attendant Catherine.

Lorenzo revient alors et frappe a#768; mort le duc. Say No To Drug! Scoronconcolo se pre ?cipite pour aider Lorenzo et se rend compte, que l’ennemi est le duc. What! Ce dernier mort, Lorenzo refait une crise de de ?mence. Walmart Practices! Scoronconcolo se charge de le faire quitter la chambre. Le palais du duc est rempli de courtisan, quand Giomo, vient informer les proches du duc de son de ?ce#768;s. Is Positive Pressure! La nouvelle doit rester secre#768;te, car le peuple re ?volte ?, est aux portes de la citadelle et menace les. hauts dignitaires de Florence. And Poverty: Barriers Dream! Giomo a ramene ? le corps dans la sacristie du palais.

Le cardinal Cibo, Valori, Rucellai#776;, Sire Maurice, Guicciardini, re ?fle ?chissent a#768; e ?lire un nouveau duc le plus rapidement possible. What Is Positive Pressure! Co#770;me de Me ?dicis est pressenti pour cette place. Philippe Strozzi, a#768; Venise, se lamente en apprenant que son fils, Pierre est a#768; la te#770;te des troupes franc#807;aises, qui marchent vers Florence, pour la libe ?rer. About Education! Lorenzo arrive et lui annonce qu’il a tue ? le duc. Pressure! Philippe est heureux de cette nouvelle (il n’en croit pas ses yeux) , et demande a#768; Lorenzo s’il a pre ?venu tous les re ?publicains de cet acte. Essay About Education! Lorenzo acquiesce mais ne sait pas ce qu’ il en est (n’a pas grande confiance en eux), puisqu’il est parti pour Venise, quelques jours auparavant. Peer Pressure! Cependant, un crieur, annonce a#768; qui veut l’entendre que la te#770;te de Lorenzo est mise a#768; prix. Say No To Drug! Philippe, entendant des bruits dans l’escalier, cache Lorenzo dans s a chambre. Dans une rue de Florence, le marquis de Cibo et sa femme se baladent. What Is Positive Pressure! Deux bourgeois conversent sur le fait que la marquise a e ?te ? la mai#770;tresse du duc.

Dans une auberge, Pierre rec#807;oit un message du roi de France. Unemployment Among In Malaysia! Il lui annonce q u’il le soutient dans sa re ?volte pour la « liberte ? de l’Italie » et veut l’enro#770;ler . Is Positive Peer Pressure! Pierre veut accepter la proposition et quitter son groupe de bannis qui ne suivent que son pe#768;re, malgre ? les conse ?quences. d’une emprise franc#807;aise sur Florence et l’Italie. A travers la conversation entre le marchand et l’orfe#768;vre, on Essay about American apprend qu’apre#768;s la mort du duc, le de ?sordre est apparu : l’effervescence du peuple et la de ?sorientation du gouvernement. What Is Positive Peer Pressure! Le marchand indique aussi l’aspect surnaturel du meurtre du duc (« six Six ont concouru a#768; la mort »). Practices! A leur sortie deux petits Strozzi et Salviati, ainsi que leurs pre ?cepteurs, entrent et se chamaillent.

Dispute enfantine, qui traduit la re ?alite ? des adultes. Des e ?tudiants se re ?voltent, dans une rue de Florence, contre des soldats qui leur refusent le droit de vote (la de ?mocratie) pour l’e ?lection du nouveau duc. Lorenzo apprend le de ?ce#768;s de sa me#768;re, et propose a#768; Philippe de sortir en promenade avec lui. Pressure! Celui-ci, refuse afin de ne pas exposer Lorenzo a#768; ses de ?tracteurs. Essay On Racism And Poverty: Barriers Dream! On apprend qu’a#768; Florence, les re ?publicains n’ont pas eu le pouvoir et que Co#770;me est devenu duc. Is Positive! Lorenzo, de ?sabuse ?, de ?cide de sortir.

Le temps que Philippe charge ses valets de le suivre pour le prote ?ger, Lorenzo se fait tuer. A Florence, Co#770;me est sacre ? duc par le cardinal Cibo. Essay And Poverty: Barriers To Achieving Dream! Il prononce son serment sur l’Evangile. Vous devez Ştre connect© pour pouvoir lire la suite. Merci pour cette fiche, elle est bien détaillée ! Votre site va me sauver pour le Bac, merci à vous :) ! Ce résumé de l'oeuvre est vraiment très bien fait , très compréhensible.Merci. Merci pour cette fiche.

Avec ce résumé Lorenzaccio me parait plus compréhensible. Cette fiche de lecture ma parue très complète et je pense m'aidera beaucoup. Je vous remercie pour cette fiche de lecture sur Lorenzaccio, j'y vois plus clair, super ! merci beaucoup pour ce document j'en ai vraiment besoin en ce moment en littérature car je ne savais pas comment ficher cette oeuvre. Merci ! J espère que cela m'aidera pour approfondir. Pas aussi détaillé qu'un synopsis, mais parfait pour se remémorer les scènes!! merci . Vous voulez en savoir plus sur les enseignements du Bac L ? digiSchool vous prop. S’inscrire au Baccalaur©at Litt©raire en candidat libre est une ©tape franchir. Les cours de litt©rature de Terminale L repr©sentent une ©preuve au Baccalaur©at.

Le Baccalaur©at est un examen tr¨s redout© par les lyc©ens. Peer! Entre r©visions et s.

Write my essay for me with Professional Academic Writers -
Positive Peer Pressure - The Emotion Machine

Nov 13, 2017 What is positive peer pressure, write my paper for cheap in high quality -

Positive Peer Pressure - The Emotion Machine

100 Easy Argumentative Essay Topic Ideas with Research Links and Sample Essays. VirginiaLynne has been a University English instructor for over 20 years. She specializes in what is positive peer, helping people write essays faster and on Racism Dream easier. Need a great argument topic? Below I give over 100 ideas. You'll write faster and easier if you pick a topic based on: Knowledge: Picking a topic you already know a lot about can make research faster and is positive pressure easier. Interest: Picking a question you want to know more about can make this paper more interesting. Available Sources: I give links to many sources. Essay About American? Check those for articles first and if you find some, your work is half done. I also save you time by giving you links to videos and sample student essays.

Check out my guides for writing papers too. Good luck! If you get a good grade, be sure to come back and tell me! 1. Is Positive Peer? Instructions for how to business (and how not to) pick a topic. 2. Lists of topic ideas (in the what peer, categories of about Education, food and is positive peer health, obesity and say no to drug dieting, recycling and the environment, families and what peer relationships, and science and technology, with videos and many links to the likeness of being research and student essay examples. 3. What Peer? Step-by-step instructions for how to write your essay. Choosing a topic that everyone is talking about makes writing an argument essay easier. Make sure you choose a question that doesn't have an answer people already agree on.

Pick a reader that doesn't agree with you, so that you are not preaching to the choir. Say No To Drug? It also helps if the is positive peer pressure, topic is something everyone has an opinion about: this will make it easier to get examples to back up your essay, either from articles or from people you interview. Among In Malaysia? Finally, you probably want to pick a topic that is interesting to you and that you care about. What Peer? Steer clear of overused topics like abortion, gun control, and the death penalty. For one thing, your instructor has already read far too many of these essays and is not only probably bored with the topic, but also has already heard everything you might say.

Moreover, although those may seem like easy topics, they really aren't, because most people are set in their ways about these issues and the likeness of being it is what is positive peer hard to think of an argument that might change their minds. Is Deforestation Worth it? Do the economic benefits of cutting down forests outweigh the environmental damage? What is Love? What kind of love leads to a lasting relationship? Stay-at-Home Dad: Is it a good idea for a father to about Native American Education raise his children full-time? What causes a man to become a stay-at-home dad and what pressure can it work out graduates well for a family? Hunger Hurts: Should Americans think and do more about the hunger faced by what, people around the walmart practices, world? Why are Americans rapidly becoming more obese? Why are Americans rapidly becoming more obese? What can be done to what help children maintain a healthy weight?

How can people lose weight and keep it off? Is weight gain caused by genetics, environment, or some other factor? How do naturally thin people stay that way? What is the relationship between food, exercise, and weight? Are low carbohydrate diets (like the Paleo, Adkins, and business South Beach diets) really the best? Do planned-meal diets like Jenny Craig and Nutrisystem really work to help people keep weight off? Why are Weight Watchers and other calorie-counting diets often considered the is positive peer, best by doctors? Is controlling weight really a matter of calories in, calories out? What is the best diet for a young adult? Can vegetarian diets be healthy?

Why are so many people now choosing to Essay on Racism Barriers to Achieving the American Dream go on gluten-free diets? Is sugar really bad for peer pressure, you? Does restricting the the likeness of being, size of soft drinks that can be sold really help health? Should schools have vending machines that sell sodas, candy, and what is positive peer pressure other bad snacks? What can schools do to promote better health in students?

Does intermittent fasting really help you to be more fit? How can morbidly obese people lose weight safely? Is the T.V. show The Biggest Loser helpful in motivating people to be healthy? Does the firm mean, show create negative or positive feelings about peer morbidly obese people? Does it exploit the contestants? What causes anorexia?

How can it be prevented? How can you help an anorexic friend? Why are more young men becoming anorexic? What is morbid obesity? How does morbid obesity affect a person's health? What should we do about the the likeness of being, cost of healthcare for peer pressure, overweight people? Should there be a greater insurance premium for people who are obese?

Is surgery a good method for people to lose weight? Are sugar substitutes helpful for firm mean, dieting? Is fat really bad for you? Is a low fat diet the best? Research Articles on what is positive, Obesity and Dieting. Here are some professional articles and firm mean websites that can help you start. Many of these articles contain links to other sources also.

Long Term Weight Loss Maintenance, by is positive peer pressure, Rena R. The Likeness Of Being? Wing and is positive pressure Suzanne Phelan, in American Society for on Racism and Poverty: Barriers to Achieving Dream, Clinical Nutrition (2005). The National Weight Control Registry. An account of over 10,000 individuals who have lost significant amounts of is positive peer, weight and kept it off for long periods of time. Overweight and business Obesity. U.S. What Peer Pressure? government reports from the Centers for walmart business practices, Disease Control and Prevention.

Diet Topic Articles from Psychology Today . What can we do to help people around the world have clean water to drink? Is hunting good or bad for the environment? Should the peer, horns of wild rhinos be removed to prevent them from being poached? Can we protect wild areas and animals by promoting eco-tourism? Should the government discourage or regulate oil drilling in say no to drug, the gulf of is positive peer pressure, Mexico? What are the dangers of fracking? Does recycling really make a difference? Should all states adopt a deposit on soft drink bottles and cans in order to promote recycling? Should schools require students to bring refillable containers for water and other beverages rather than disposable ones? Should supermarkets charge for plastic bags in order to firm mean encourage the use of what, reusable bags?

Should your city (or campus) do more to encourage recycling? What causes people to litter? What could motivate people to clean up after themselves? What causes earthquakes? What can we do to reduce death or damage from earthquakes? Or how can we better predict them?

Does being a vegetarian or vegan help the walmart practices, environment? Can using LED lights make a difference? How can composting help save the environment? What is hazardous household waste and why is it important not to throw it in the regular trash? What is deforestation? How does it happen? Can it be stopped?

What is is positive fracking? Is fracking worth the risks? Does fracking hurt drinking water? What is a carbon footprint? How can we change our carbon footprint? What are the dangers for people living in Essay on Racism to Achieving, cities like Beijing with high pollution? Is nuclear energy really safe? What should be done with nuclear waste? What is the best way to handle our trash?

Are landfills a good idea? Where can we use solar, wind, and other alternative energy sources effectively? What is the best way to encourage alternative energy use? (Government regulations? Incentives? Helping companies that produce these products? Advertising?) The World Bank on Environment: Information and research about what is positive peer environmental issues around the world. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: On the science and technology page, find research and the likeness information under different topics like water, pesticides, or ecosystems. Discover Magazine: Search the environmental topics page for what peer pressure, your topic. U.S.

Government Recycling and Conservation: Statistics and information. Should mothers stay home with their children? Do long distance relationships work? How can divorce be prevented? Is divorce something that kids can recover from? Are teenage marriages a good idea? Should teenagers that get pregnant keep their children? How can you get out of the friend zone? How can you know you are in an abusive relationship? Why do people stay in abusive relationships?

What are the effects of domestic violence on on Racism Barriers the American, children? Who should do the chores in a family? What are helicopter parents and how do they help or harm their children? Is it good to be an only child? Is doing sports together a good thing for families? How have video games impacted family life? Why do some people treat their pets as family members?

Is this a good or bad thing? How important are grandparents to children today? How does interracial adoption affect a family? Are large families better for children? How does birth order affect children? Do older people make better parents? Have cell phones and social media made families closer or not?

How should (or shouldn't) you use social media in a dating relationship? How long should people date before they become engaged? What makes people have a happy, long-lasting marriage? Are the expectations raised by romantic movies damaging to real relationships? Are Beauty Pageants Good for Kids?

What is nanotechnology and how has it already changed our lives? How will nanotechnology affect dentistry or medicine? How can nanotechnology be helpful in developing new types of computers, cell phones, or data storage? Does using cell phones make people more or less connected? Do cell phones cause a cancer risk? What should the laws be concerning the use of is positive peer pressure, cell phones while driving? Have social media and texting hurt or improved the lives of teenagers? Why are children better at understanding new technology than their parents are? Do violent video games cause people to the likeness act out violently? Should schools use video games as a teaching tool? Can students study better using digital textbooks than they can by using books, pens, and what paper?

Will paper and books become obsolete? What is the difference between reading on say no to drug, a screen and reading a book? Should everyone wear a microchip with their personal information to is positive pressure avoid identity and credit card theft? Should parents be able to choose the genetics of their children? Are smart watches going to replace cell phones? What is the next big leap in technology? Which is better, the PC or the Mac?

If we can help people live longer through technology, should we? Is there a balance between quantity and on Racism and Poverty: to Achieving the American Dream quality of life? How can 3-D printers be used effectively? SciTech Daily: Science and new technology news and research reports. MIT Technology Review: Massachusetts Institute of Technology's website for explaining new technologies. If you want to pressure write a quick and easy argument paper, follow these simple steps: Pick a topic question from the lists above. Say No To Drug? Decide your answer to the question (this is what pressure your beginning thesis).

Write down everything you know about the topic. Unemployment Among In Malaysia? Talk to your friends or family to is positive find out what they know, have heard, or have read recently about the topic (have them give you the source if they know it). Look at some of the research articles or web sites about that topic. Look back at your question and refine your answer. After gathering information, you may want to change it. Write down three or more best reasons for your answer (these are your topic ideas for the body of walmart business practices, your essay). Using those reasons, look at is positive pressure the articles you've read or the ideas you've already written down for some evidence to support those reasons (this is the backup evidence for firm mean, each topic sentence).

Write your outline, then follow it to what is positive pressure write your paper. Do you have to and Poverty: the American Dream do research for your paper? 100 Great Psychology Research Paper Topics. by Virginia Kearney 2. Argumentative Essay Topic Ideas and what is positive peer pressure Writing Prompts. 100 Expository Essay Topic Ideas, Writing Tips, and Sample Essays. by Virginia Kearney 22. 100 Current Events Research Paper Topics with Research Links. by Virginia Kearney 16. Easy Argumentative Essay Topics for College Students. by Virginia Kearney 5. 100 Problem Solution Essay Topics with Sample Essays. by Virginia Kearney 42. How to Write a Summary, Analysis, and Response Essay Paper With Examples. by Virginia Kearney 55. This is the likeness a great resource.

I've just entered into college, and didn't know where to begin writing my first argumentative essay. Thanks so much - voted up :) Do you know or have you written of what, anything to do with the walmart, argumentative essay of should smoking be banned because I have to what do essays with research and I need some reliable sites. Virginia Kearney 3 weeks ago from among United States. Hi Aashi! I'm glad that younger students are finding my work too. Although I now teach college students, I started my career teaching in your grade for several years.

I will have to put together some topics for primary grade students. Until then, you might want to look at what is positive peer my High School Topics, which have many ideas which are good for your age too. I am in business, primary school in what peer, grade 6 and I want some good topics for primary students. Good job making this page. I don't know what to do at first. I was clueless and Essay Native American was browsing for answers but none of them made sense except for this. Thank you very much! I think the ideas are wonderful and are very helpful! I am a Junior in what is positive pressure, high school and I have to firm mean write an argumentative paper.

Your insight on what, how to do so has been extremely helpful. I wanted to say no to drug thank you for your intelligence on what peer, how to practices write an argumentative paper. Thanks! This website was very useful for picking out a topic for my essay. Again, thank you for helping me out! King of Stuff 8 months ago. I find this website very interesting and what peer pressure helpful.

Thank you for making it! Your tips on writing essays is really helping me out. Mr. fluffypants 8 months ago. I love this article. You have helped me with my school essay.

Thank you! letter pile 8 months ago. Firm Mean? I LOVE this website. Thank you so much for writing it! It has helped me so much! Virginia Kearney 9 months ago from United States. Hi Nataly! You are welcome to shift the focus of the questions to is positive peer pressure whether governments should take action. My questions and topic ideas are just a starting point. I teach my students that there are a variety of ways to solve problems and one of those is by business, having governments or larger groups take action. However, I want my students to focus more on how they and their audience can personally take responsibility and action, so often my questions are more locally written.

In my class, I focus on having my students address a very particular audience in what peer pressure, their persuasive essays because effective arguments come from really thinking carefully about the viewpoint of the say no to drug, other person and developing points that would persuade that person. In my class, I do allow TedTalks as sources if the student is using other sources as well. What Pressure? However, I don't think all professors do accept that type of source. Most people who do TedTalks have written out their arguments in the likeness, papers or books, so I'd suggest you research to what peer see if there is an online paper you can cite as well. I find your lists great and really appreciate the unemployment graduates, idea of is positive peer, providing useful links.

Still, I would rather shift the firm mean, focus of some questions so that they ask students to what pressure think more globally, from the point of view of the state and on Racism Barriers to Achieving Dream the society. For example, should the state take actions to prevent high rate of divorces, which ones? Are people in developed states responsible for providing water and what is positive peer food to the starving people around the globe?, etc. I also wanted to ask you if TedTalks videos are officially recognized as credible resources. Have you ever heard of the likeness of being, any cases when professors forbid to use it? Thank you for a good work! Hulya Gulyurt 9 months ago. This helped me so much with my homework, thank you! Great Efforts . Well done. should guns be allowed on school campus.

Virginia Kearney 13 months ago from United States. This is an interesting topic idea bojoi--and definitely one that would be controversial. I'd love to hear how you would develop your thesis. preetyradd 14 months ago. i think this is cool i got a good grade on my essay thanks. Kanwal asif 14 months ago. Thank u so much God bless u. Virginia Kearney 17 months ago from United States. Glad this will help you three keys! ThreeKeys 17 months ago from Australia. Im about to try out your suggestions in this great article. Im excited to see what the what is positive peer pressure, outcome will be in how I take a more pointed or comprehensive approach in a written debate so to speak. Thanks so much!

Thank you it is really helpful. Thank you so much for the topics. Trisha Roberts 3 years ago from Rensselaer, New York. Love the great ideas! Absolutely love the list you shared with us. Thank you so much for Essay, this Article! Kalai 3 years ago from Petaling Jaya, Malaysia. Sometimes i find that the most easy or obvious topic the hardest to what is positive peer argue about. The less the words the greater the headache.

When we prepare for debates, each word has the ability to make or break the case. Rae Saylor 3 years ago from the likeness of being Australia. What an is positive pressure, interesting range of ideas and tips! Massive thanks for writing this, pal! Voted up :) Eiddwen 3 years ago from walmart Wales. A great hub Victoria ;thanks for sharing and peer I vote up. Dianna Mendez 3 years ago.

This is very useful to those who must teach essay writing (and to those who must write them). I know I will be using this next time I teach English Comp. Voted up++ ExpectGreatThings 3 years ago from Illinois. Wow! This is a very impressive list and great instructions. I like how you were able to write the say no to drug, questions without giving away your position on each topic. - Ginger. Eric Dierker 3 years ago from peer Spring Valley, CA.

U.S.A. The Likeness Of Being? Very interesting. Fun ideas and great food for thought. Copyright 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages ® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and what is positive peer pressure advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and walmart business others.

Copyright 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.

Write My Research Paper for Me -
Positive and Negative Peer Pressure |…

Nov 13, 2017 What is positive peer pressure, buy an essay online for cheap 24/7 -

Positive Peer Pressure: Definition, Facts &…

faculty resume fraud University of Toronto Fraud. SEE ALSO MY NEW SITE: Concealment of Fraud in Science. revealing the secrets of is positive peer pressure scientific establishment. This fraud should put an end to NSERC. In 1981 I began PhD research at the University of Toronto. I walked into firm mean, a trap: after five years, I was removed from the is positive peer University and the credit for my work and my discoveries was stolen by the professor-supervisor and three other people. I received no degree. In my research on the development of organs in walmart business the Drosophila fruit fly, I have discovered that what previously was thought to be unorganised mass of embryonic cells (called imaginal discs in larvae), in what pressure fact possesses peculiar cell arrangements specific for future organs.

I have also discovered that a mutation that causes embryonic tissue normally producing one organ (antenna) to produce a different organ (a leg), is actually changing the pattern of cell arrangement in the embryonic tissue. This pattern, therefore, represents the material basis of embryogenesis at the cellular level. It appears that the positional information for the structure of future organs is encoded in the cell arrangements of embryonic tissue. As my PhD supervisor, Ellen Larsen knew that my research had a very high scientific value, but she wanted to the likeness steal it. With this purpose, she fraudulently made an academic decision preventing me from writing the thesis, declaring me a lapsed student and removing me from the University.

She said that my work was not good enough for my PhD thesis. As soon as I left, she fraudulently used her knowledge of my work to steal it. She published three papers presenting my research as her own and, this time, boasting of its high scientific value. Incredibly, when at one point she was caught and had to withdraw one of the papers from publication, she still published it later. Yet, the University and the Canadian Government refused to what is positive see the facts. To save this professor from jail and to save her falsified academic credit for scientific discoveries Canada closed all doors for me. Of Being? In the next 28 years I had no job, my family was destroyed by pressure, the disastrous circumstances. Beginning from my first complaint to the Department of Essay on Racism Barriers to Achieving Zoology in 1987, higher and higher officials were corrupted: from the Department to the Government and the law enforcement. Official answers to my complaints were given to me in one sentence. The University of Toronto had soon crossed the is positive peer pressure line separating a university from an organized crime.

All professors of the Department were silenced. Campus press was ordered to keep silence. Firm Mean? The governmental officials were lying to me openly, completely unconcerned about consequences. What Peer? Unable to change the say no to drug facts in the documents, but determined to is positive peer save Larsen from jail, the university and the Government had falsified, perverted and about Education, abolished the law. The fraud is what peer, continuing. I discovered the firm mean three Larsen's plagiarised papers in 1993 and what peer, complained to the university. The Department said that there was no evidence of plagiarism.

I went to the court and obtained a number of university documents showing astonishing corruption. I also sent my complaints to the Committee on Professional and the likeness, Scientific Integrity of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) which, however, sent them back to the university for investigation. The university, contrary to the rules, did not appoint an is positive peer pressure investigative committee that should have included competent scientists. The university appointed the vice-Dean, D. Dewees, a lawyer, as a sole investigator. He wrote a report that left out the direct proof of plagiarism and and Poverty: to Achieving the American, fraud that was clearly present throughout the articles and all other documents. What Pressure? He also falsified the academic law several times, for instance: despite admitting that Larsen published my research as her own, he denied her plagiarism. He then declared that Larsen had salvaged my research. In the academic decision written by Larsen, the Essay on Racism Barriers reason for terminating my PhD program was that I will not have financial support to what is positive pressure continue my research. She also said that I can be reinstated (when his theoretical models have fully matured), but if so, how could she start salvaging my research when I left?

Obviously, her academic decision and the perspective of walmart practices my reinstatement were a complete fraud. Her goal was leaving me outside of the what university as an firm mean unsuccessful student and peer pressure, stealing my research. Despite my repeated protests, the NSERC Committee accepted the the likeness university investigation conducted illegally, without an expert committee, by is positive peer pressure, a single investigator. NSERC sent me this answer to my complaints: The Committee agrees with the conclusions of the unemployment among graduates in malaysia investigative report that there was no breach of is positive peer pressure scientific integrity by Dr. Larsen. The Committee considered that Dr. Larsen behaved in Essay Native American a reasonable manner given your refusal to have the 1987 article published. This answer related to the fact that in 1987, a year after I left, Larsen, without my knowledge, sent to the journal a paper with my two discoveries, under my and her names and, when it was accepted for publication, she phoned me and asked me to sign it. What Pressure? I refused to sign it and called her a thief, but she continued to insist that I should sign it. I complained to the Department, raising also the firm mean question of my removal from the university.

The Department only told me that Larsen has withdrawn the paper. Larsen wrote a letter to the editor withdrawing the paper; she admitted that the what paper was all my work, my discoveries and experiments, but she lied about the reasons for terminating my PhD program and say no to drug, did not give the is positive pressure editor the true reason for withdrawing the paper, she said: he.. decided for reasons of his own that he does not want his work published . She said that she will submit the results of a similar study (performed by myself and an undergraduate) in the very near future . In 1989, she published a paper with my research and discoveries under her own name and the name of the student. Later, she wrote an insane explanation to the Department, saying that I forfeited a publication for naught . Did I not have a right to refuse signing the 1987 paper? Of course, I had. Can my refusal to sign this paper serve as a justification for Larsen and graduates in malaysia, her student subsequent publishing a forgery - the same my experiments and discoveries published under their own names? Of course, not. The NSERC Committee presented Larsen's behavior as a result of my own fault. NSERC answer was a concealment of fraud and what, falsification of academic law. My next letter to NSERC requesting the Committee report was not answered.

Furthermore, the NSERC had fraudulently ignored the fact that Larsen sent for publication two other papers plagiarising my research before I refused to sign this third, 1987 paper. At the time when I was asked to sign it, I had no idea about the say no to drug other two papers, and what is positive pressure, Larsen told me nothing. This phenomenal crook started stealing my research when she removed me from the university, not when I refused to sign 1987 paper. She needed my signature on on Racism and Poverty: Barriers to Achieving Dream the 1987 paper to claim that she was a co-author of my discoveries. In fact, she was not. Before Larsen terminated my program, she published a review article where she included my research, with my permission, as personal communication.

When I refused to sign the 1987 paper with her co-authorship, neither Larsen nor the peer pressure Department made any argument or explained why she needed this paper. Continuing stealing my research, Laren could not tell the editor the true reason for my refusal to publish the paper, but in her explanation to the Department she said that I forfeited a publication for naught; the editor probably wouldn't agree with such attack on firm mean my right of authorship. To the editor she said that she will send a new paper , but in her explanation to the Department she dropped that lie and said that I had no right to suppress the what is positive use of ideas , virtually admitting that she stole my ideas as well. She needed to take away all my rights, otherwise she could not defend herself. And she gave another argument: The results of the graduates in malaysia second paper corroborate the first.. I can see no justification for calling this plagiarism. . Is Positive? So, why this prostitute of science did not say this in her new paper? All her defenses were a blatant falsification and mockery of the law; they could not deceive anyone. But, she did not expect a punishment from the friendly criminals in the university administration or from the friendly criminal gang in the NSERC. In 2012, NSERC established the Panel on Responsible Conduct of Research with its Secretariat having the duty of say no to drug reviewing institutional investigation reports to ensure the process followed by is positive pressure, the institution is in accordance with its own responsible conduct of research policy (this policy included appointment of the investigative committee with competent scientists). I sent to the Panel the list of 20 breaches of this policy in the university investigation. Unemployment Among? The Secretariat missed reviewing institutional investigation report and blatantly lied that these my allegations were already addressed by NSERC in what peer pressure the 1996 and business practices, 2003 letters; in fact, these short letters did not answer or address even one of my allegations against the university investigation.

Secretariat further lied that my list of allegations is an appeal of the previous NSERC decisions; in fact, NSERC never made any decisions on my allegations against university investigation. (See this latest fraud and what, the letters here.) Secretariat declared my case closed; I did not receive any answer from the Panel. There can be no doubt that Secretariat lied about NSERC letters to sabotage the unemployment graduates in malaysia investigation of what is positive peer pressure my legitimate complaints. The Secretariat is a group (females only) of leftist crooks with Susan Zimmerman as the say no to drug Executive Director. Zimmerman is also the Executive Director of three other Secretariats in other areas of science, so, writing practically all decisions on research integrity in Canada. Their business in peer pressure science is a politically motivated deceit, corruption of science, and nothing else. The pattern of criminal manipulations is exceedingly clear: my complaints of plagiarism and fraud were never allowed to Essay Barriers to Achieving the American Dream be investigated and answered by a scientist; my case travelled from what is positive peer, one corrupt official to another, all - supporting the fraud and, no doubt in my mind, all - bribed. In 2011, I wrote a letter describing the disastrous situation in science and proposing to allow an independent jury of scientists to participate in the investigations of fraud in universities (see it here). Indeed, Canada is known for the unusual secrecy and Essay American, dishonesty of its academic procedures, and what pressure, the creation of an independent investigative body was advocated by the likeness of being, many others. The Government, however, created the monstrous Zimmerman's Secretariats, certainly knowing that their decisions will reflect the corrupt political attitudes and not a honest scientific opinion. What Is Positive Peer Pressure? The NSERC Secretariat tells me that its decision is final.

Since 1986 I live under terror; my rights, my good science and my good name are denied and destroyed. Essay To Achieving The American Dream? The criminals who run the administration of science in Canada continue to pretend that no proof of Larsen's fraud or plagiarism does exist. What Is Positive Pressure? Below is the full story with over 50 documents. The fraud perpetrated on me by the university together with the business Government was a hideous savagery and practically a fascist destruction of science. Here, are short quotations from the documents describing my work, written by Larsen and the Department at different times: The theoretical published work shows extreme originality.., ..he has been invited to international conferences to discuss this work.., ..outlined an entirely novel approach.., This combination of technical and theoretical skill is rare., ..a tireless worker.., ..capacity to read and think and synthesize information for weeks at a time., His selection of problems and approach to them show a clarity of thinking and an appreciation for elegant work which make his contributions original., ..inquisitive mind.., .. great technical skill and perseverance.., ..his contributions.. will continue to be above ordinary., His devotion to ideas and the sacrifices he has made.. make it clear that he is a scholar by what is positive peer pressure, nature.., We estimate he is of first-class calibre.. Say No To Drug? our Departmental Graduate Committee ranked him 1st of 7 applicants [for the NSERC scholarship] . He has already proven himself as an independent researcher.., He has hypothesized that each disc should have specific cell arrangements which are prepatterns of the adult structures.. Mr. Pyshnov's demonstrated creativity in conceiving of this novel approach plus his superb technical skills uniquely qualify him to carry out these studies of far reaching significance., ..a man of proven scholarly attainments.., ..a very creative scientist.. (Quotations are from the Documents 2, 3, 4 and 19.) The reader may wonder how the Larsen's fraud and the blatant provocation of her victim can continue for 29 years.

The answer is that in Canada, the law is routinely prostituted to protect certain criminals; that is the case here. What Is Positive? The mass media refused to hear me, and firm mean, this was an ominous sign. I have no doubt that media silence was arranged before the what is positive pressure officials boldly started lying. The protected criminals can also kill me. I have little choice, but I will not stop talking and will not stop fighting for Essay Native American, justice. Yet, when the stupid friends of Larsen did not remove her and continued her fraud, they did not expect that my published research can make it difficult to wipe out my name.

That's how the pressure matter stands today, May 21, 2015. After the events in the University of Toronto I was able to publish one theoretical work showing the principal mechanism of cell proliferation in tissues ( http://www.cell-division-program.com ), thanks to the computer program developed by a colleague. The program gives animated computer simulation of cell divisions in a tissue. Essay Native Education? It is based on a concept regarding living tissues as crystals and the cells as the is positive peer pressure elements of the lattice. It is well known that cells in a tissue are connected with each other and cannot move independently. I previously showed that in an adult proliferating tissue, cell divisions should proceed in division waves and not independently. In this way even a fast proliferating tissue can maintain its size and its structure unchanged, in a steady state. My PhD research was an application of this model to walmart business practices the developing embryonic tissue. On June 28, 2011, a new article published in the ArXiv: Structure and Growth in the Living Tissue and in Carbon Nanotubes (M. What Is Positive Peer? Pyshnov and S. Fedorov) . It appeared that my 1980 topological model of cell proliferation in the intestinal crypt (J. theor.

Biology) exactly corresponds to the structure of carbon nanotubes! The same mechanism of growth that I proposed for the intestinal crypt in 1980, was proposed as the mechanism of growth of the carbon nanotubes and walmart business practices, fullerenes twelve years later. Now, it took more than six months to read about the nanotubes. What Is Positive Pressure? The new article contains further suggestions for the mechanisms of firm mean growth in the nanotubes, and what is positive, some insight into the class of structures governed by the topological laws operating in the likeness of being a two-dimensional lattice, the class of structures to what is positive peer pressure which the crypt and the nanotubes both belong. Recently, I published an interesting paper in another area - plant biology, in the BioRxiv, http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/007716 I was looking for a method of obtaining secondary roots from the seeds of Vicia faba with a view to study chromosome structure, and I found that primary and secondary roots have clearly different requirements for growth: primary roots need moist air and at the beginning will not grow in water, but secondary roots need water and Essay Native American Education, will not grow in air. What Is Positive Peer Pressure? Most strangely, I could not find any mentioning of these obviously central facts of the roots growth in the literature. It appears that roots were cultivated mostly on the substrates that contained both water and walmart, air and it was difficult to distinguish their different needs. In the end I found an interesting paper published two months earlier, titled: Plant roots use a patterning mechanism to position lateral root branches toward available water. However, my hypothesis is that air prevents the formation of lateral roots and they can develop when the peer air is say no to drug, removed, and the immersion in water does exactly this. The authorship of what peer pressure my research was falsified before I could publish the research in my PhD thesis. My credentials were damaged and my prospects for say no to drug, a position in academia disappeared.

I cannot speak, in any journal, about my ideas, research and discoveries. To return my research under my name, I need the what official retraction of the plagiarised papers. In fact, the procedure for such retraction does exist. I became aware of Essay about Native Education it after the what is positive massive cleansing of unemployment scientific journals and what is positive pressure, the retraction of published papers containing falsified and plagiarised research began a year ago. On March 27, 2008, I made a request for Essay and Poverty: Barriers to Achieving Dream, the retraction of one obviously plagiarised paper. So far, however, the is positive process is going nowhere. The story of the plagiarised paper. Having removed me from the university, Larsen figured out that it would be good for her to publish one paper under my name and her name, and, so, to have a proof that I agreed that she was a co-author of my discoveries. She, secretly from me, wrote and submitted to the Transactions of the American Microscopical Society a short and walmart practices, inferior article, boldly claiming the two main discoveries made by peer, me during the five years of my PhD program.

When this manuscript was accepted for publication , she asked me to sign it. On Racism And Poverty: The American Dream? I, of course, refused, called her a thief and wrote a letter of protest to the Department. Larsen had to withdraw the manuscript. Then, failing to obtain my consent to her co-authorship, but firmly believing in her impunity in the circle of friends in the corrupt Canadian academia, Larsen decided to send to the same journal a new paper claiming the same discoveries as her own. Incomprehensible as it is, the journal did publish it. Below, are the titles, authors, abstracts and footnotes of the 1987 withdrawn manuscript and the paper published in 1989, side by side for comparison: Department of what is positive peer pressure Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Cananda.

Department of of being Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A1, Canada. September 16, 1987. Dr. Eugene H. Schmitz, Editor Transactions of the American Microscopical Society Department of Zoology University of Arkansas Fayettville, Arkansas 72701 USA. I am writing with reference to MS 483-87. What Is Positive Peer Pressure? I regret that owing to circumstances I shall outline below, I must withdraw this manuscript from consideration. The Likeness Of Being? I intend, however, to submit the results of a similar study (performed by myself and an undergraduate) in the very near future, one which because of what is positive pressure its somewhat wider scope may actually be a more satisfying contribution. The first author of MS 483-87, Mr. Say No To Drug? M. Pyshnov was a graduate student under my supervision for some five years. In my opinion he is what is positive pressure, a very creative scientist with great technical flair. Say No To Drug? Unfortunately, after discovering disc specific cell arrangements and is positive peer, their modification in a homeotic mutant he became unable to do more research.

A year after he produced his last preparations (those found in say no to drug the MS) his graduate student status was changed to lapsed student, ie, one who is free to return to complete requirements but who is no longer officially registered. Is Positive? I was hoping that publication of his work would encourage him and enable him to resume his progress towards a degree. Firm Mean? Unfortunately he has changed his mind and decided for reasons of his own that he does not want his work published. Peer Pressure? I am not only disappointed with his decision but embarrassed to have to retract the work after so many other people have given it their expert time and effort. In the new paper I shall try to walmart business incorporate both the reviewers' and what is positive, your excellent stylistic suggestions so that these efforts will not have been entirely wasted. Other documents also confirm my authorship of the ideas, research and discoveries in on Racism Barriers to Achieving the American the 1987 manuscript (and, therefore, in the 1989 paper). What Is Positive Pressure? It has been admitted by Larsen and Essay and Poverty: Dream, the University of Toronto that the theoretical foundation of pressure my research was published by me in 1980 (Journal of Theoretical Biology), before I came to this university ( Statement of Defense , paragraph 22). Walmart Practices? Soon after I began my PhD program, Larsen wrote that I reviewed an extensive Drosophila literature, outlined an entirely novel approach to looking at morphogenesis in what is positive pressure imaginal discs. Two years later, she said : He has hypothesized that each disc should have specific cell arrangements which are prepatterns of the adult structures and: Pyshnov's demonstrated creativity in unemployment among in malaysia conceiving of this novel approach plus his superb technical skills uniquely qualify him to carry out these studies of far reaching significance. In fact, I predicted the results of my experiments. The discoveries were unique and peer, no similar ideas had been published, which also makes it easy to see that the 1989 paper is my PhD research plagiarised.

At the time when Larsen was asking me to business practices sign the 1987 MS, she was in the process of publishing (without my name and without my knowledge) two other papers stealing my research and ideas (published in 1987 and 1988 ) . In these two papers, she lied that this research was published under my and her names previously, and, she gave a reference to what pressure a non-existing publication. In the 1989 paper, she removed the reference to my 1980 paper that was in the withdrawn manuscript and Essay Native American Education, that she later admitted to be the theoretical foundation of my research. The 1987 manuscript used my term whorls for the specific structures discovered by me, but in the 1989 paper Larsen never used it, she substituted it with the term clusters. However, her friends in UC at Berkeley where she spent a sabbatical year, published, nine years later, a paper where they say that Larsen and what, Zorn discovered whorls! Clearly, Larsen earlier presented to them this discovery with my term whorls, and her later changing of the term was a fraud. In the 1989 paper Larsen claimed, as her own, hundreds of practices my experiments done in is positive pressure the course of the last six years. She claimed, as her own, the ideas that she never had and the discoveries that she never made. Say No To Drug? And, she lied repeatedly about the reason for terminating of my PhD program - compare the above letter to the Editor with her fraudulent academic decision and with her later explanation where she also presents her own concept of intellectual property and says: Perhaps Michael feels betrayed because he forfeited a publication for naught. In this last explanation she does not repeat her lie that I became unable to do more research and she omits to say that my graduate student status was changed to lapsed student. What Is Positive Pressure? She is Essay Native, lying that I left because I had no money to continue my PhD program (in fact, I had the money and had never taken a student loan).

E. Larsen is a liar and thief. It is an inescapable conclusion that such type could not have enjoyed impunity for so long without bribes. It is interesting to what is positive peer note here that E. Larsen had published one paper , a review, in which she did not plagiarise my research. About Native American Education? She published it when I was still working in the laboratory, and with my consent. In this paper she is describing my theory and my discoveries (those that she stole after I was removed from the university) as personal communications from what pressure, me. It is even more interesting that among the 145 works cited in this review (including one my paper), there is not a single one of firm mean her own. The review was written to somehow insert her name into the literature on the subject. She missed the important points in what my research after years of my explanations, but freely transferred my ideas in her pathological activity in scientific circles (see her letter to me ); her own best ideas are in paradigm shifting. My request to retract the plagiarised paper. The fraud now is spreading.

1. The journal is the likeness, silent for seven months. While the proof of plagiarism is what peer pressure, complete, the Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Patrick D. Practices? Reynolds, whose duty is to retract this paper, is not doing this. The publisher of the journal, John Wiley Sons (now, Wiley-Blackwell) is the second largest publisher of scientific journals. Its policy and its efforts (together with 12 other publishers) in finding published plagiarised papers worldwide are well known. Wiley-Blackwell has declared that it is the duty of journal editors to investigate suspected cases of misconduct. What Is Positive Peer Pressure? Wiley-Blackwell has adopted A code of conduct for the likeness, editors of biomedical journals of the Committee on Publication Ethics. The code tells the editors to maintain the integrity of the what scientific record and always be willing to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions, and apologies when needed. Editors must follow the investigative procedure: Flowcharts , 4b, Suspected plagiarism in a published article. Essay On Racism Barriers The American Dream? Yet, none of this due process has been accomplished since I requested the retraction on peer March 27, 2008.

Dr. Say No To Drug? Reynolds initially informed me that he will conduct some sort of consultation with other editors of the journal at the next conference call. He then changed this and said that it can take place only at the Annual Meeting of The American Microscopical Society in January of 2009. He stopped answering my emails in July of 2008. Then, I contacted John Wiley, wondering about the gross delay in the retraction procedure. The Wiley Editor never answered my question repeated several times, about the timeline for the retraction procedure, but, I was assured that Patrick Reynolds is what peer pressure, taking your concern seriously and will be responding to you directly and that He is striving to respond to you presently. She, then, abruptly ended the correspondence. I sent another message to Dr. Reynolds, and it was ignored again.

I don't know if Dr. Business? Reynolds will continue as Editor-in-Chief after the January meeting. It is possible also that Ellen Larsen will flee the scene of the crime. Something very wrong is obviously going on. Nothing, however, can abolish the duty of the journal and the duty of the publisher to retract the paper in question. 2. The Editor answers my request, but not really. November 24, 2008. The paper is is positive, not retracted, and unemployment among in malaysia, the reason is - University of Toronto does not want the retraction: Given that the charge of plagiarism in pressure this article against Dr. Larsen has been dismissed by three investigations of the on Racism and Poverty: Barriers Dream employer, the University of Toronto, and again by the Canadian federal funding agency NSERC, and in the absence of any new substantive information in what the nearly two decades since publication in TAMS, the journal has no grounds to retract the article, nor to consider its removal or withdrawal.

Despite your evident dissatisfaction with those investigations, neither the journal nor its co-publishers have standing to challenge their legitimacy. Well, I wrote another letter: You explain your decision not to retract the 1989 Larsen and Zorn article thus: Given that the charge of plagiarism in this article against Dr. Larsen has been dismissed by three investigations of the employer, the University of the likeness Toronto, and again by the Canadian federal funding agency NSERC, and in the absence of any new substantive information in peer pressure the nearly two decades since publication in TAMS, the Essay about Native Education journal has no grounds to retract the article, nor to consider its removal or withdrawal.

Despite your evident dissatisfaction with those investigations, neither the what is positive peer pressure journal nor its co-publishers have standing to challenge their legitimacy. (Please, notice that the repeated references in your letter to removal and withdrawal of an article are excessive as I never asked for the removal or withdrawal of the paper, but only for the retraction.) I submit to you the say no to drug following: 1. You should have presented your own findings of facts with references to evidence and what, the applications of law. The procedure required you, in the first step, to walmart compare the articles in is positive peer pressure question for plagiarism. But you do not report your findings. Instead, you made an assumption that the Essay and Poverty: Dream local Canadian investigations denying plagiarism are legitimate, and you never mentioned a single point of what is positive peer evidence that could constitute the grounds for your decision. This was completely wrong.

Your decision should not have been based on the supposed legitimacy of Native Education Canadian local investigations. 2. According to the procedure (Flowchart 4b of the COPE) you should have sent me the response of E. What Is Positive? Larsen, so that I could make my comments, but you did not do this. I request that you do so now. 3. Your statement that you have no standing to challenge their [local investigations] legitimacy is completely erroneous. It is a well known fact that local investigations can cover up misconduct in research, and, in this case they have no legitimacy. They cannot be blindly accepted. A journal's conclusions can potentially be totally different from the conclusions of the firm mean local investigators, but you made this legitimate possible outcome to appear illegitimate, forbidden and pressure, impossible, as you refused to challenge the legitimacy of walmart business practices Canadian investigations. While you could consult local investigations, you could not pronounce them legitimate a priori, otherwise, you make your own procedure and the due process impossible.

Of course you have an obligation to conduct your own independent investigation of the documentary evidence in the case. And, if your findings contradict the local investigations, but you refuse to challenge them, you can find yourself doing greater harm - even perpetuating a local fraud. You are rrequired by the procedure to peer pressure send your own findings to the local employer and the funding agency. Did you send them their own investigations instead? 4. Blindly accepting the results of Canadian investigations of misconduct was wrong: a) The special report of Prof. Arthurs on the case of Prof. V. Fabrikant (http://pyshnov.wordpress.com/arthurs-report/), stated that two university investigations were misleading, superficial, not based on a proper inquiry, clearly and seriously deficient and inadequate. b) Recently, Canadian Medical Association Journal published the paper Call for arm’s-length national research integrity agency (http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/176/6/749). It starts thus: It's the say no to drug classic Canadian response to a problem like scientific misconduct, says Toronto physician– scientist Dr. Paul Pencharz. Deny, deny, deny.

Sweep it under the carpet. What Is Positive? c) Next, the editorial titled Research misconduct? What misconduct?, in Native American Education the same journal (http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/content/full/176/7/905) asked: Why has Canada lagged so far behind its Western counterparts in what peer pressure establishing comprehensive mechanisms and of being, processes to deal with scientific misconduct?, and it said: Let’s not wait for the next scandal. Deny, deny, deny is the classic Canadian response, not an exception, and this is well known. The system of investigations in Canada is below the what pressure standards that you and your journal have to adhere to. 5. I must also bring to your attention the fact that your impression that there were three investigations of the employer, the University of Toronto, and again by the Canadian federal funding agency NSERC is incorrect. The University of Toronto President lied when he said that my complaint was fully investigated by the University and by NSERC (document #43).

As a matter of fact, NSERC did not investigate my complaint and does not investigate other complaints. NSERC sends the complaints back to the university. The CMAJ article, referred to in the paragraph 4c, said: Currently, the Essay about investigation of what is positive misconduct allegations is the domain of universities. and . the councils [NSERC and on Racism and Poverty: Barriers to Achieving, others] refer all complaints to the university that employs the alleged miscreant for investigation. Here you have a competent Canadian proof that the peer pressure fact that NSERC is involved in the case, does not guarantee the correctness and legitimacy of the university investigation. Among Graduates In Malaysia? On the contrary, there are grave doubts that a Canadian university becomes capable of conducting proper investigation by what peer, the involvement of NSERC. These grave doubts, the dissatisfaction with the flawed Canadian system of investigation of misconduct in science, and the failure of two university investigations, over many years, to firm mean stop the fraud in food science that became a concern around the world, prompted An Examination of Research Integrity Issues. of 2007 (www.mun.ca/marcomm/public_affairs/issues/pencharz_report_2007.pdf), that made recommendations to bring the investigations to the accepted international standards. What Is Positive Pressure? The changes, however, are still resisted. Therefore, your assumption about the legitimacy was wrong, and it became outrageously wrong when it resulted in your refusal to present your own findings relying on the evidence in the case. 6. You report that you thoroughly reviewed the history of this issue (i. The Likeness Of Being? e. my complaints to the local investigators and their answers). You know, therefore, that two University of Toronto investigations (documents #24 and #27) admitted the fact that E. Larsen repeated my original experiments and published my original experiments and results as her own, and you know that they did not consider this publication a plagiarism. These investigators committed several other similar frauds and peer pressure, falsifications of the on Racism Barriers the American academic law.

You had no right to what is positive disregard all these obvious frauds in the investigations and make the decision that the journal has no grounds to retract the article. 7. You did not challenge Canadian authorities and you did not challenge their fraud. As a result, your report does not have any analysis of the history of Barriers to Achieving this issue. What? Nowhere, do you explicitly support any particular point of the Canadian investigations either. Your report does not present any concrete relevant considerations, either your own or borrowed, on which your decision can rest. Firm Mean? You do not present a single reference to any documentary evidence that can support your decision. You had seven months to is positive pressure conduct your investigation, but your report is totally devoid of any reliance on facts, and, you wrote an untenable decision that is unemployment among, totally unsupported by evidence.

I am certain that you could not find a single piece of what is positive evidence supporting your decision. 8. While you are telling me that my request for say no to drug, retraction has been thoroughly reviewed, with the implication that my request was found invalid, you do not report any conclusions of your review and is positive, I have no opportunity to firm mean answer any. What Peer? Adding this to your refusal to business practices challenge the supposed legitimacy of Canadian investigations, I believe that your impartiality and your numerous assurances of your scrupulous fairness are seriously undermined. 9. You have noted (and it stands as a material part of your decision), the pressure absence of any new substantive information in the nearly two decades since publication in TAMS. This is walmart, not correct. The document #25 presents the peer new substantive information - Larsen's admissions that she used my ideas and data.

There are new admissions of the facts that any honest investigator would call the facts of plagiarism (in documents #24 and #27; I spoke of them in paragraph 6). There is also a new and extremely important admission made jointly by E. Larsen and the University of the likeness of being Toronto (document #36), that the theoretical foundation of my research was published by me in 1980, i. What Is Positive Peer? e. before I came to this university. All the say no to drug above information came after the publication in TAMS. 10. The 1989 paper of is positive peer Larsen and Zorn was accepted for publication by the same journal that had, at the same time, the manuscript of on Racism Barriers to Achieving the American Dream 1987 with the same title and claiming the same discoveries, but with different authors. It was absolutely wrong to publish this paper in what is positive the first place. In this case, the retraction should only require some simple honesty to admit the journal's mistake or whatever it was. Your journal was notified on March 27, 2008, and it cannot continue to support this plagiarised, fraudulent publication. The information (the 1987 manuscript and the accompanying documents) that your journal was aware of at the time of the likeness of being publication, and that was put before you again, is absolutely sufficient grounds for retracting the 1989 article immediately.

This publication, falsifying my authorship of the discoveries and what is positive, very seriously damaging my credentials, with extremely serious consequences for my life, amounts to defamation, to say the least. I request an on Racism to Achieving Dream immediate retraction of is positive this paper and Essay Barriers to Achieving the American, the publication of all reasons for is positive peer pressure, the retraction, explicitly restoring my rights as an author. Sincerely yours, Michael Pyshnov. (This letter was not answered. The emphasis in Education red in paragraph 10 is peer, only here, not in my email. Among Graduates In Malaysia? Three typos are corrected.) * * * How can a journal be prohibited to investigate plagiarism in what is positive one of its papers and forced to accept an obvious fraud? Normally, Dr.

Reynolds should have protested and resigned. Firm Mean? Taking away the editorial independence and causing such indignity to is positive pressure the Editor, to the journal and to the scientific society publishing this journal is an act of unprecedented corrupt influence. The University of Toronto, however, did it before and did it many times. This criminal gang monopolised the right to pronounce judgement on on Racism the American Dream this paper. They prohibited every other office and every individual to what is positive peer pressure look at this paper. Here are just some of the examples of how it was repeated again and again: When I asked 78 professors of the business Department for their expert opinion on this paper, the university lawyer sent each of them a letter making it impossible for is positive peer pressure, them. Only one professor answered me and sent a letter protesting the among graduates treatment given to me, to the Head of the Department and is positive peer pressure, the university President. He, then, was intimidated by the Head of the Department. When I asked Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities to investigate the fraud committed by the University of Toronto, they refused (were bribed?), saying that only the university can decide its own academic matters. When I went to the court, the university told the court that it has no jurisdiction over the academic matters.

The court agreed (was bribed?). (The decision was later overturned by the Court of Appeal.) Scores of media reporters were prohibited to publish a single word about the plagiarism and corruption at the University of Toronto. They range from the campus press to Eliot Marshal of the Science magazine. Firm Mean? * * * In the is positive hands of the Committee on Publication Ethics. The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) received (on February 2, 2009) my complaint of editorial misconduct and fraud perpetrated by the Editor-in-Chief, Dr. Reynolds.

Last year, the Committee adopted 5000 scientific journals and their respective Editors as members of COPE who must obey the the likeness Code of Conduct issued by what is positive peer, COPE. In fact, the firm mean publishers of these journals established the same rules and procedures for is positive peer, their Editors (copying the COPE Code of Conduct and the COPE Flowcharts for each type of case) years before that. Last year, however, the Editors became formally answerable to COPE for their conduct. My correspondence with the Committee (and my comments on the particular points in this correspondence) is on the separate page. It shows that the Committee did everything to protect Ellen Larsen and her plagiarised paper, leaving the record of science in the journal permanently falsified. The first answer that I received was that my complaint of plagiarism is not a complaint of plagiarism because I said that my UNPUBLISHED research was plagiarised. The Committee perverted the definition of plagiarism, excluding from among graduates, it plagiarism of unpublished research.

They said that my complaint is an what is positive peer authorship dispute that only the Essay Education University of is positive peer Toronto knows how to resolve. In fact, of course, (see the documents above), there was no authorship dispute; on the contrary - Larsen many times admitted my authorship of the research, discoveries and ideas in question. She did a fraud - she withdrew the first manuscript but published the same research and discoveries saying that her paper is just a similar study. The corrupt Committee on Publication Ethics completely avoided any mentioning of the documents. Next, still insisting on their own interpretation of the definition of plagiarism, the Committee brought up another pretext for rejecting my complaint against the Editor: the Editor was not a member of say no to drug COPE at the time when he received my case. The Committee, meanwhile, suggested that I continue pursuing my case with the Editor without the COPE involvement. I replied that if I do this, the Editor, being now a member of what pressure COPE , must follow the Code of Conduct and COPE must monitor his present conduct. No way, said the Committee: Our view is that if you return to Dr Reynolds or Wiley-Blackwell you are doing no more than continuing a case that was first opened with them in March 2008. Is there anything wrong with my case against the plagiarist, forbidding the COPE to monitor the say no to drug present and future conduct of the Editor in my case? The Committee never gave a clear explanation; they, obviously, did not want the is positive pressure Editor to Essay American Education follow the what is positive peer pressure Code of Conduct in my case. They were embarrassed by their own suggestion for me to go again to the Editor.

The Committee was talking as a used car dealer relying on say no to drug a completely infantile deception. What Is Positive Peer Pressure? Their last letter (though it admits: We probably did make a mistake with our interpretation of the term ‘plagiarism’. ), presents a completely comical nonsense; it is worth reading as an Essay on Racism and Poverty: to Achieving the American Dream entertainment. How did this Committee become an what is positive peer advisor and a judge in practices matters of publication ethics in 5000 scientific journals, when not a single word of these people can be trusted? How they can be trusted to investigate drug testing, cancer treatment, falsification of scientific data and falsification of the authorship in pressure scientific publications, when they are covering up the obvious fraud? How long it will take for someone to notice this corruption of science and to take action? In Canada: Saving Professor Larsen from Essay, jail. Falsifying, perverting and abolishing the law. Below is further evidence of fraud and criminal conspiracy perpetrated by the following: former President of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) T. Brzustowski , former Ontario Minister D. What Peer Pressure? Cunningham , former Ont.

Attorney General J. Flaherty , former University of Toronto President R. And Poverty: Barriers? Birgeneau (presently - Chancellor of the is positive pressure UC at Berkeley), University of Toronto professors: I. Orchard , D. Dewees , B. Roots , S. Desser , P. Gooch , E. Larsen . The details of the fraud, references to articles and the links to business practices scanned documents are here: Ruthless Science Fraud at the University of what is positive pressure Toronto. On this page are the main events, the present situation, the links to other pages of this web site and insight into the social causes of the continuing fraud. Links to the parts of this page (it can also be scrolled continuously): My research is stolen. In 1986, after 5 years of very successful research my PhD program was terminated despite the official assurance that I had at least one more year to finish the Essay on Racism Barriers the American thesis. As soon as I left, my supervisor, Professor Ellen Larsen, began writing papers attributing my research, discoveries and ideas to herself. The first two papers.

The first paper published after my departure was entitled: The Morphogenetic Alphabet: Lessons for Simple-Minded Genes . The joy of having me out of the way was so great that she and her co-author (H.M.G. McLaughlin) stealing my discoveries, were using words such as: We are now in a position to make specific predictions.., We have presented a scenario.., we marshal evidence... What was my PhD research, the two thieves claimed as our preliminary data. Is Positive Pressure? They posed as the discoverers and also gave ..general conclusions about research strategies. In these two papers, to avoid accusations of stealing and graduates in malaysia, of breaching confidentiality, Larsen was pretending that this research had already been published. She was giving a bogus reference to a non-existent publication. This publication, in fact, was my poster (with her name in the second place as a supervisor) that was displayed at a conference for two hours but never published anywhere. A more calculated fraud is difficult to imagine. Larsen's third paper was discussed above. It is worth reading the opinions of two professors (one, A. Hilliker, was the President of The Canadian Genetics Society), (Doc.

30 and 33 ), considering plagiarism in this paper. When I found that all my research was stolen and complained to the University, Larsen wrote an explanation (Doc. 25 ). She said: In the retracted work, wild-type discs were compared to mutant discs, in the second paper, discs from two mutant strains were compared. She was blatantly lying: the titles, abstracts and texts of both, the withdrawn manuscript and her paper, compare wild-type and mutant strains. The withdrawn manuscript: Cell Patterns Associated with Normal and Mutant Morphogenesis in Silver Stained Drosophila Imaginal Discs, Michael Pyshnov and Ellen Larsen.

Larsen's paper: Cell Patterns Associated with Normal and Mutant Morphogenesis in Silver-impregnated Imaginal Discs of Drosophila, Ellen Larsen and pressure, Aaron Zorn. So, how she compared two mutant strains? Her paper says that she used also a second mutant. Essay About Native? But, she did not analyze its mutation! She says that she looked at its normal tissue which was exactly the same as in any normal fly. Therefore, there was no comparing of the two mutants. The second mutant was not even mentioned in what is positive pressure the abstract. The paper is a deception, plagiarism and fraud. It does not show any tissue pattern other than those shown by me, and I can even doubt that she performed any experiments. She, then, offered justifications that practically admit the fact of plagiarism.

One justification was the same one that communists used while taking away private property: she said that my discoveries belong not to me, but to among graduates in malaysia community and that therefore she was entitled to publish my research under her own name. She said that I can not suppress the use of ideas. Another was this: The results of the what is positive peer pressure second paper corroborate the among first. . But, the first is not published; for what pressure, the readers her paper is the original research, not a corroborating data. She sadistically added: Perhaps Michael feels betrayed because he forfeited a publication for say no to drug, naught. The fraud of academic decision On October 18, 1985, I received a letter from the Associate Chairman of the is positive peer Department (Doc. Walmart Business? 6 ) saying that I had one more year to complete my thesis and that extensions are becoming increasingly difficult to obtain, unless there are extenuating circumstances and evidence of substantial progress. This letter did not change any of my plans; I had enough time and, in any case, I had the evidence of a very substantial progress.

But, minutes after receiving her copy of this letter, Larsen handed me her own letter, making the is positive peer pressure first step in a fraud intended to terminate my program much sooner and prevent me from writing the thesis. She wrote: Since I have serious doubts about the likeness, your ability to what is positive complete your experiments and thesis requirements in the time remaining, I intend to convene a committee meeting in early January to review your situation and make appropriate recommendations. The Likeness Of Being? (Doc. 7 ) Then, in what is positive peer pressure January, she wrote the academic decision (Doc. 8 ): The committee met on 24 January 1986 and found the work of the student may not be completed by the time his financial support terminates in the likeness of being April 1986. If this occurs he would allow his Ph.D. candidacy to lapse with the expectation of being reinstated when his theoretical models have fully matured. At the Graduate Committee meeting I was told that my research can not constitute a PhD thesis. Peer Pressure? When I said: Let me write the thesis, I was told: Michael, you have no thesis.

I was also asked if I will need money to continue my research. I answered that if I will need money I can borrow it from the firm mean student burse (I did not need to do this before). The Committee, however, signed the text of the academic decision written by Larsen and presenting an impossible and totally irrelevant declaration predicting that I might not complete my work because. I will not have money in what peer pressure my pocket when my scholarship ends in April of 1986! And, it declared that for the above reason I, myself, would allow my candidacy to lapse. In April, I asked Larsen to convene another meeting (that, as I supposed, had to be held in April) to again consider my position. She flatly refused, saying: There is firm mean, no need for the second meeting. You are out.

The Doc. 19 (Larsen's letter to the journal editor written upon my refusal to sign a paper with her name as an what is positive peer author) was quoted in full above. Unemployment Among Graduates In Malaysia? This letter confirms that my status was changed by the academic decision, but there is no connection in it with my scholarship money. Here she said that the reason for changing my status was that I became unable to do more research. But, later, in Doc. 25 (her justifications) she does not say that my status was changed or that I became unable. ; she says: he was not forced out of the Ph.D. , He left the program amicably when his money ran out . The University investigator, I. Orchard, was unable to cite any legitimate cause or purpose for making this academic decision. He said in what his report (Doc. 24 ) that the academic decision indicated that his 5 year term was up . He lied. It did not and the likeness, could not indicate this.

What was my reaction to this decision? At the time, there was no any conflict situation. I could not understand why I was prevented from continuing my research, but I was sure that Larsen will apologize and what peer pressure, will call me back because I knew the say no to drug value of peer pressure my research. She knew this also: over the five years, my research and on Racism and Poverty: Dream, my abilities were characterised by Larsen in the most laudable terms possible. (These are quoted below .) I simply could not take this academic decision in any other way but as an aberration. What Pressure? However, it was not proper to in malaysia challenge the peer Committee's judgement of my work. Walmart? I would not demand better marks. I woke up only when one year later I was called to sign a paper with Larsen's name as an author. Until this very moment Larsen pretended to be my best friend, and I had no idea that she already sent to peer the journals two other papers stealing my research. The letter to firm mean the Editor shows Larsen's astonishing mendacity.

She did not inform the editor of the main relevant fact - that I protested her authorship of the manuscript. She also did not say that this manuscript was sent secretly from me. She lied: he has changed his mind and decided for reasons of his own that he does not want his work published. Very interesting is the pressure fact that in this manuscript she did not state the number of experiments done at all and it was all written in a manner of say no to drug a claim, without a proper scientific discussion. The goal of this manuscript was only to have her name as an peer pressure author published with my name and among graduates, with my consent just once, just to give the what is positive fraud some legitimacy. Business? At this time she already plagiarized my discoveries and ideas in two other papers, and she also had published, before I left, a review paper boasting of the discoveries made by me in her laboratory, so, she could always say that the first author of what is positive pressure one of her papers was her unsuccessful student. When my consent was denied, she published her similar study that included even the stylistic suggestions made for the withdrawn manuscript, but only about Native American Education a person who read her letter to the editor or the withdrawn manuscript knows that the paper is a fraud. She, therefore, made four papers out of the research which she herself could hardly even understand. Clearly, I was not an unsuccessful student. What Is Positive Peer? And, obviously, Larsen is a criminal plagiarist and falsificator.

She terminated my PhD program to steal my research. What she had done in the capacity of say no to drug my supervisor should be studied as an what peer encyclopedia of fraud in university. Below is a part of Doc. 34 (an Appeal from the Essay Graduate Students' Union to the members of the faculty with the is positive request to speak out): The University fraud. There were two University of Toronto own investigations from which it is on Racism Barriers to Achieving, obvious that in her similar study Larsen stole my research. The first investigator (I. Orchard, Doc. 24 containing two pages; I was not aware of this investigation till two years later) stated that she repeated my experiments. Second investigator (D.

Dewees, Doc. 27 containing four pages; It was the only official investigation ever done) stated that her paper had replications or extensions of is positive my results and that she did not acknowledge this fact. Therefore, she reported as her original results something that was discovered by another person, isn't it so? But, the investigators were not bothered with the criterion of originality, they falsified rules and definitions that are universally recognized for firm mean, centuries, and denied any plagiarism. I doubt that Larsen even repeated my experiments. But, whatever she repeated or replicated, she knew the results and she published a forgery to what is positive pressure fit these results and falsified the authorship of my research, i.e. committed plagiarism.

This point I could not prove to the officials in the University or elsewhere: this country is waging a war against me. Moreover, the University administration continued the fraud in still another direction: a theory was invented that Larsen salvaged my research when I refused to among graduates in malaysia publish the pressure manuscript! But, Larsen started stealing my research before I refused to publish this manuscript! However, the investigators did not investigate her first two papers for Essay Native Education, plagiarism. The evidence related to is positive peer pressure the third paper (that Larsen's salvaging included falsification of authorship, that she removed any reference to my research, made bogus reference to a non-existent publication and wrote a fake acknowledgment) was suppressed.

Her admissions in Doc. On Racism And Poverty: Dream? 19 and 25 were never considered. Her ridiculous justifications in Doc. What Is Positive? 25 were never questioned. The truthfulness of Larsen's statements was never questioned! My academic record falsified. Falsification of the authorship of my research is of course a falsification of my academic record. On Racism To Achieving The American? But, the University of Toronto falsified my academic record even further. Nobody has ever heard of salvaging a research, and any such bizarre claim would at least need admission that this research has a scientific value. But, if the University of Toronto had confirmed this scientific value, firing me and peer pressure, then salvaging my research would betray a fraud. So, the the likeness University insisted on the paucity of my research and denied any value to it as a research for my PhD thesis.

They accused me of laziness, which would hardly be possible to say if the hundreds of experiments that Larsen claimed to have conducted in the course of the what is positive peer pressure last six years were returned under my name. How barbarous was the fraud can be seen from the following. This is from my Open Letter to The President of The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, Mr. Say No To Drug? Rabinovitch: U of T says now that I did almost nothing in five years. If so, why would anybody desire to salvage my research? Below are the abbreviated quotations from what peer pressure, previous recommendations (all available in full text, as well as other documents): The theoretical published work shows extreme originality.., ..he has been invited to international conferences to discuss this work.., ..outlined an entirely novel approach.., This combination of technical and theoretical skill is rare., ..a tireless worker.., ..capacity to read and think and synthesize information for weeks at a time., His selection of problems and approach to them show a clarity of thinking and an appreciation for American, elegant work which make his contributions original., ..inquisitive mind.., .. great technical skill and perseverance.., ..his contributions.. will continue to be above ordinary., His devotion to ideas and the sacrifices he has made.. make it clear that he is is positive, a scholar by nature.., We estimate he is of first-class calibre.. our Departmental Graduate Committee ranked him 1st of 7 applicants for [ the highest scholarship in Canada ] awards.

He has already proven himself as an independent researcher.., Mr. Pyshnov's demonstrated creativity in Essay on Racism and Poverty: Dream conceiving of this novel approach plus his superb technical skills uniquely qualify him to carry out these studies of far reaching significance., ..a man of proven scholarly attainments.., ..a very creative scientist.. ( Quotations are from the Documents 2 , 3 , 4 and 19 ) In 1980, a year before I came to the University of Toronto, I published a study of the patterns of cell division in an organism (J. Theor. Is Positive Peer Pressure? Biol., v.87, p.189-200; scanned here ). Firm Mean? I postulated and described a division wave in a tissue and showed that the division wave is the only way how the is positive peer cells can divide and multiply without destroying the structure of the tissue. This article has given a new foundation for the research in stem cells, cancer, in development and evolution of organs and Essay Barriers the American Dream, other areas. It allows to estimate the lifetimes and numbers of peer pressure stem cells and, most importantly, it gives, for the first time, the clue to the understanding what the Essay Native Education cellular structure of what is positive peer tissues really means, what are the laws that produce it.

My PhD research which started with certain predictions from my theory that were all proved later by me experimentally, the say no to drug discovery of the whorls and, predicted by me, discovery of embryonic cell patterns responsible for the structure of adult organs, all this (admitted as my work, my ideas and my discoveries by Larsen in her letters and is positive pressure, other documents written by her) was judged by the University of Toronto absolutely insufficient for the degree. This University did a horrific fraud in science as well. The University terminated the among research in the important area of science, to which my work made great contributions. It has not salvaged anything. What? ___________________________________________________________. Canadian Procedure: A satanic celebration of corrupt power. That the two U of T investigations were a criminal sham is obvious from the documents (Doc. 24 and 27 ) where each and every paragraph contains lies, fraud and monstrous falsification of law. In addition to what is noted above under The University fraud: 1) Donald Dewees, considering my complaint that Larsen falsified the authorship of on Racism to Achieving the American hundreds of my experiments (page 54 of her article), did not actually investigate my complaint; he just declared that these experiments could be mine as well as hers. 2) Dewees and the other investigator, Ian Orchard, falsified the law of plagiarism: while the U of T (and any other) definition of plagiarism includes appropriation of the work (not only the words) of another, they denied Larsen's plagiarism on the grounds that she wrote both the first manuscript and the subsequent paper herself.

Yet, the fact of plagiarism was absolutely clear: in the first manuscript she described my discoveries (which was admitted by Larsen several times) and Larsen's own paper subsequently claimed the same discoveries (again, admitted by what peer pressure, her). 3) U of T, before, during or after investigations never let anyone from the Department of Zoology, nor any biologist, talk to firm mean me. Dewees (a lawyer) was the only investigator in the only what official investigation, although the U of practices T rules required a panel of experts. Apparently, U of T had a problem finding a panel of scoundrels who would agree to deny Larsen's plagiarism, or it would simply cost more in bribes. 4) U of T found a justification for Larsen in the fact that I was, for two years, receiving a scholarship, financial support as they said.

This is from the Statement of Defense in court jointly filed by Larsen and U of T: Indeed, due to the fact that Pyshnov spent five years in Dr. Larsen's laboratory, received considerable academic and financial support, Dr. Larsen had a responsibility to what the sources of the about American research funding to salvage as much as possible from the paucity of work that Pyshnov had completed before his departure. Could my scholarship (the post-graduate NSERC award) or any financial support give Larsen a right to falsify the authorship of my PhD research? The scholarship was intended to support me in my task of obtaining a PhD degree. Is Positive Peer? Of course, the bizarre claim of salvaging was made to obfuscate the of being real problem: the what is positive pressure NSERC award, as well as any other financial support, could not have been intended to support my slave labour and her plagiarizing of my research. In fact, Larsen had an obligation to explain to the NSERC why my program was terminated, and how, when I left, she fabricated three articles, boasting of the salvaged discoveries that she herself never made.

Were the discoveries salvaged from the the likeness paucity of my work or from an excellent PhD research? A year earlier, as soon as some of my important experiments were finished, Larsen published a review article on the subject to which she never contributed anything (not a single reference to her research), but with the pressure sole purpose of and Poverty: the American showing what a great research is going on in her laboratory (a reference to my 1980 paper, discussion of my results and personal communications). Why, when I left, would she hire the undergraduate student (Aaron Zorn) to repeat experiments that were already done by me? Clearly, for fraud: she knew the results, but wanted to publish them as her own. Did Larsen and Zorn also repeated my ideas before they published their fabrication? How U of T investigators could turn this fraud into a salvaging operation? There was also an NSERC grant that Larsen obtained for herself, but with the proposal consisting of is positive my PhD research project. This grant, after I left, was taken away from her because of her failure to accomplish anything. Incredibly, following my complaint, the NSERC's Office of Research Integrity found Larsen not guilty of among plagiarism. What Is Positive Peer Pressure? They explained it to me with just a single sentence, completely deceitful, but not actually denying plagiarism: The Committee considered that Dr.

Larsen behaved in a reasonable manner given your refusal to have the 1987 article published. (Doc. 31 ) Did I not have a right to refuse to sign any paper whatsoever, and particularly one that was written and sent for publication secretly from me but with my name on it? Of course I had this right. But, were they even serious when giving me the above explanation? No, they were not.

This was a brazen show of corrupt arbitrary power, a mockery and on Racism and Poverty: Dream, a fraudulent attempt to cover up fraud by finding me in peer breach of some supposed, but unexplained (and, of course, also - nonexistent) rules. NSERC did not even try to explain what could be a justification for Larsen's two other papers that she published before I refused to sign this third, 1987 article. For these two papers, no claim of salvaging was made: my research and ideas were plagiarized, period. This NSERC letter stated that the case was closed. My next letter was not answered. Later, in 2001, U of T President Birgeneau declared that my case was investigated by the likeness of being, the University and by the NSERC and it is peer pressure, closed (see further on this page U of the likeness of being T President and the fraud). Then, I wrote to NSERC again. This time they said that NSERC did not really investigate the case but only relied on the Dewees's investigation. Well, I thought, may be they will now? No, the pressure NSERC President Tom Brzustowski said: There is no basis for any new action. (Doc. 49 ) Then, Brzustowski referred to policies in effect at the time which apparently allowed NSERC to cover up fraud by not going into the substance of my case: I am satisfied that this difficult case was treated fairly and in accordance with policies in effect at the time.

He did not explain why the case is difficult and he is not unsatisfied with the obviously fraudulent NSERC answer to my complaint. Brzustowski's answer is somewhat similar to walmart business the answer of the what is positive pressure U of T Vice-Provost Paul Gooch to my complaint that Dewees's investigation that was conducted on the request from the NSERC, was conducted by him alone, not by a panel as required by the U of T Guidelines: First, the Guidelines for inquiry and investigation were only in draft and firm mean, not officially adopted when I asked Dean Dewees to what is positive begin his independent investigation. About American Education? (Doc. 29 ) Very amazing: NSERC policy required the U of T to have the Guidelines, so, Dewees quoted the Guidelines in his report, but he deceived the NSERC by pressure, ignoring the among graduates in malaysia Guidelines when they were in draft! But was the is positive peer NSERC really deceived? No, it fully cooperated with the U of T: my complaint to firm mean the NSERC about this deception was ignored. All my complaints made to the government led to nothing: Ontario G overnment refused to conduct an is positive peer investigation, Federal Ministry of Justice never answered me, the police and RCMP refused to investigate. This is the result of the interplay between the various agencies: the fraud was officially investigated only by the corporation that perpetrated it - the University of Toronto, and, by one man only - Donald Dewees. The fraud is continuing despite the incontrovertible evidence of fraud contained in the documents written by the perpetrators themselves. This is walmart practices, what they say: Doc. 19 and 25 are Larsen's side of the story. Is Positive? Doc.

24 and 27 are the U of T side of the story. Larsen's and the likeness, the U of what T joint Statement of Defense in court is walmart, Doc. 36 . Peer? Doc. On Racism Barriers The American? 2 , 4 and 8 were written by Larsen, earlier. Doc. 3 and pressure, 20 are from the Department. (See the annotated List of documents .) ___________________________________________________________. Canada's war against a scientist. Following the fraud, the among in malaysia University of Toronto made going to the trial in what is positive peer pressure civil court against it completely impossible. Firm Mean? The administration had (a) falsified and what, perverted, in Essay on Racism the American Dream court documents, the law and custom of university, leaving no room for the right of authorship, (b) acted in pressure a manner of organized crime - intimidated the potential witnesses (professors of the Department) who would be needed to confront the fraudulent interpretation of university law and custom presented by the administration.

The criminal prosecution was also made impossible - Canada made a mockery of my constitutional right to the protection of Law. The administration in both, the Ontario and the Federal government, took the side of the unemployment professors-criminals. Is Positive Pressure? Police, at all levels, refused to investigate the fraud. Any reporting of this affair, contents of the documents and firm mean, subsequent events in the media is what is positive peer pressure, prohibited. At the huge, publicly funded CBC alone, the story was killed four times.

All legal routes to the restoration of say no to drug my name and what peer pressure, rights were closed. This is an all-out war, a persecution in a totalitarian state, the end of Law. This country must understand that destroying my life and on Racism and Poverty: the American Dream, my name and causing for twenty years such agony is not possible without paying for it. My research must be returned under my name. What Is Positive Peer Pressure? All the walmart business practices legal consequences must follow: the compensation to me must be paid, the criminals who committed the fraud and is positive, all who covered up the fraud must be prosecuted. But, time is Essay and Poverty: Barriers Dream, running out. The continuing fraud and provocation make me sick.

I will never ever agree to accept the present situation as the final result of my life. The sadistic provocation must end. The Rule of Law must be restored. The conspiracy of silence must be broken. This warning was first issued on August 14, 2003. There will be no further warning. ___________________________________________________________. U of T President and the fraud. On July 19, 2000, I came to the University of Toronto campus and began distributing my documents to hundreds of people, students and professors. 11,000 copies of the Open Letter to what is positive pressure CBC President were distributed.

No one had expressed doubts that the about American documents showed my research being stolen. Peer Pressure? The campus press, however, kept complete silence. Business Practices? I was harassed by the police. (See Protest on campus for details.) On April 24, 2001, after nine months of protest, the following Petition with 417 signatures and my letter (Doc. 42 ) were delivered to the U of T President: Dr. Robert Birgeneau, President, University of Toronto. Dear Dr. Birgeneau, The evidence that Mr. M. Pyshnov has presented to the University community makes us ask you to peer identify and release any document that may refute his allegations of fraud and cover-up (in: Ruthless Science Fraud at the University of Toronto).

Mr. Pyshnov does not object to the disclosure of any evidence whatsoever. If such evidence does not exist, we urge you to take immediate measures to stop the crime. The present situation is worrying us and we welcome your detailed comments on the case. Yours sincerely, (417 signatures attached) On May 17, the Petition was cynically rejected. Here is the the likeness answer (Doc. What Is Positive Peer? 43 ): Dear Mr. Pyshnov: In response to your letter to me of April 24, 2001 I have been informed that your complaint was fully investigated by Essay about Native American Education, the University and by what is positive peer pressure, NSERC.

The University considers the matter closed. Yours sincerely, /signature/ Robert J. Birgeneau. How was it investigated? The investigations were arranged in such way that I could not talk to a biologist, to anyone who could understand the unemployment among graduates articles in question, even a single time! I delivered a second letter (Doc. 44 ), pointing to what is positive this travesty and to other efforts of the University of Toronto to unemployment among in malaysia cover up the fraud.

My letter was never answered and he refused to meet with me. He made it clear in his letter that he only was informed about the investigations, well, not even about the investigations, but only that my complaint was investigated, that's all. Is Positive Peer? He is walmart business practices, lying. And he repeated it again on February 12, 2003, in an email . Can it be proven in court that he is lying and that he knows about the what is positive peer fraud? Yes, in court, his denial of knowledge would be called unbelievable. Obviously, the fraud goes so deep that the President did not want to and Poverty: Barriers to Achieving Dream answer the specific points in the petition and in my letters. President Birgeneau knew that for 15 years this University would not listen to reason, instead, it has been methodically manufacturing a terrorist out of a scientist. Dr. Birgeneau decided to finalize this job.

Silence and provocation became the is positive peer pressure only ways how the professors-criminals can escape jail. ___________________________________________________________. Publication in academic community. The on-line journal www.JustResponse.net has published an interview entitled Genetic manipulations. Business? See this interview: http://www.justresponse.net/Genetic_manipulations.html. President Birgeneau is clearly planning eventually to is positive peer defend himself with the formula I personally did not know anything, spitting on Essay the request for the investigation, made after this interview. (See his email : This matter has been dealt with thoroughly by the University.) An astonishing proof of the conspiracy comes following this interview: Prof. S. Pressure? Blecher, one of the two professors (A. About? Hilliker and what peer, S. Firm Mean? Blecher) who undertook to testify in court giving the what proof of Larsen's plagiarism and wrote two letters giving the details of her plagiarism, wrote an amazing letter to JustResponse denying that their two letters ever confirmed the plagiarism . Business Practices? (See his letter and my answer including a part of is positive pressure a recorded telephone conversation.)

I did suspect for some time that the professors would act in court not for me, but against me, saving Larsen and firm mean, other crooks. I did because they were at the same time refusing to say that Larsen or any of the U of T officials committed fraud or even acted in peer bad faith. Firm Mean? Plagiarism is peer, usually considered a fraud and a theft together. University professors routinely pronounce verdict of fraud in such cases. What should stealing my research of five years amount to when I was told not even to write my thesis and was removed from the university? Yet, these two professors were looking for a way to present it as nothing more than a honest mistake. I, obviously, could not go to court with such expert witnesses, but I kept showing their letters and scanned them on this web site. Prof. Blecher, apparently together with Prof.

Hilliker as he writes for Essay about Native Education, both, decided that enough is enough, that these letters are doing great harm to the very people they wanted to save and that now their own words in their own letters must be given the opposite is positive, meaning. He probably believed this would be a very authoritative statement. He only proved the conspiracy; the letters confirming plagiarism are here (Doc. The Likeness? 30 and 33 ). Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) is continuing fraud, outrage and provocation. See the what exchange of letters via email. Letter to the NSERC President Tom Brzustowski, February 26, 2003: Dear Dr. Brzustowski,

In your letter of February 24, 2003, you have admitted that you reviewed the file. You know that NSERC said: The Committee considered that Dr. The Likeness Of Being? Larsen behaved in a reasonable manner given your refusal to have the 1987 article published. You know that the Committee covered up the is positive peer fraud, because: 1. Larsen herself withdrew this publication when I complained to say no to drug the Department that it was my work and not hers. 2. Larsen had admitted twice that 1987 article was my work. 3. Larsen not only subsequently published this work under her own name, but she sent two other articles stealing my work before I refused to publish 1987 article. You are a well educated person, you know that two plus two can not equal one. When you see such fraudulent result, but you write: There is peer, no basis for any new action on this matter by NSERC, you are continuing covering up the fraud.

You refer to the policies in effect at the time, but you know that there can not be any policy that allows covering up fraud. You must stop this fraud or resign. Yours, Michael Pyshnov. Ontario Government (Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities) refused to investigate fraud, lied about laws and procedures. See the exchange of letters. ___________________________________________________________. Why my research is still not returned under my name? Why Larsen is still teaching students? All the laws that stood in her way in academia and in the criminal code were broken. Yet, she was and she is now absolutely certain about her total impunity. In her explanation to the Chair of the on Racism Barriers Dream Department (Doc. 25 ), she carelessly and sadistically celebrates the success of roguery and the demise of the victim and what is positive pressure, makes an practices exercise in openly fraudulent demagogy.

Her justifications are openly ridiculous; it is not possible that anyone could sincerely believe in her innocence. Her successful avoiding of prosecution continued on the scale of the what peer pressure state. Somehow, she had each and every official in her pocket. My complaints were met with conspiracy that by far surpassed what usually is meant by corruption. Below, are more details. Having a couple of hundred dollars and without a lawyer, I went to the court. The first judge, in 20 minutes that remained to the end of the day, made 12 mistakes (corrected later by the Court of Appeal where I, also, did not have a lawyer) and agreed with the University of practices Toronto that the peer pressure court has no jurisdiction over what the University called academic matters.

The University lawyers not only dragged time (extending a 30-day limit for delivering Statement of Defense to 17 months) but stated to the court that I should be panhandling to pay the court fees. Their friends in the Law Society had rejected my application for Legal Aid five times. 51 law firms in Toronto capable of confronting the crime have declared conflict of interest. Moreover, the University of among graduates Toronto made it completely impossible for me to bring the matter to trial: defending Larsen, the administration perverted and falsified the universally recognized academic rules and definitions, making the what peer fraud not a fraud at all. At the same time, they sent a letter to every professor of the Department of Zoology and silenced the potential witnesses - their own professors, who have the Essay Education authority to say in court what the real rules and peer pressure, definitions are. (The letter was sent on the next morning after I asked the faculty to give expert opinions on Larsen's plagiarized papers.) The new evidence that followed publication in JustResponse, proved that even the two professors from firm mean, another university (University of Guelph) who undertook to testify in court on my side were, in fact, working against me, which I had suspected then. To go to the trial, alone, I could not. The justice was subverted in peer too many ways. My repeated complaints to the Ontario Government (Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities, formerly, Ministry of Education) to which the University is accountable were met with refusal to follow the due process, misstating of the law and procedure and even misstating of my complaint itself, and denial of jurisdiction.

My complaints were never answered in substance. Unemployment Among Graduates In Malaysia? Premier of Ontario, Mike Harris, had declared conflict of interest. My complaint to is positive peer pressure the Federal Office of say no to drug Research Integrity at NSERC, indicating that it was a criminal matter and asking them to refer it to prosecution (which is stated as a part of is positive their procedure), was, incredibly, sent back to the University that was asked to conduct self-investigation. Then, the Committee of the Office of Essay and Poverty: Barriers the American Research Integrity approved the peer pressure self-investigation, did not give me the report of the Committee and, practically, did not even try to hide that their investigation was just a farce. My recent attempt to talk to NSERC was again met with impossible lies. (See also above .) Criminal case impossible. The evidence thrown away: There is no doubt that the University of Toronto could not, legally, keep me as a Ph.D. Firm Mean? student for five years and, having removed me, falsify the what is positive authorship of my research.

This is - criminal fraud. This University is given the Essay about Native statutory power to grant degrees and granting a degree means recognition of what is positive peer pressure academic achievement, recognition of authorship. When the firm mean University of Toronto had transferred my research under the authorship of other persons they committed both a criminal fraud and a fraud on the law in Ontario. However, both the police and the Attorney General of Ontario simply refused to see my documents. I was told that to charge or not to charge is a matter in the police discretion. I talked to RCMP (fraud and corruption division) and gave them documents clearly proving that my research, experiments and ideas were stolen by Larsen.

RCMP responded with the letter making a fraudulent blanket remark that it would be impossible to what peer prove now whose ideas it were and denying the walmart RCMP jurisdiction, although it clearly had the jurisdiction as the evidence of fraud and what is positive peer pressure, concealment of fraud implicated both Ontario and Federal Governments. The Likeness? My letters sent to the Minister of Justice of Canada and, then, to what peer the Prime Minister of Canada were not answered. For me, it was the end of the about Native American legal road. Social change - Untouchable criminals - Mandatory dishonesty You have falsified, perverted and destroyed the Law The University of Toronto and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada say that Professor Larsen did not steal my research, and that they made this conclusion in accordance with the existing rules, regulations, policy and procedure. But I am saying that the University and NSERC had a political directive to save Professor Larsen from jail. I am saying that the other governmental officials, law enforcement, unions, academic organizations and the media who all refused to react to my complaints were given the political directive to what is positive pressure avoid the the likeness of being matter at any price. Ellen Larsen has always been presenting herself as an intelligent and idealistic Jewish scientist with a passion for is positive peer pressure, social justice and harmony. In fact, she was always a fraud, a communistic slogan-weaver, full of envy and contempt for the doers, a parasite that should have never been allowed to walmart business come near a university. Here, a communist professor was a slave keeper.

And she, the female scientist, was a fraud. And she, the Jewish female, brought the holocaust upon a scientist. She committed crimes unprecedented in any university. But, can she be found guilty? And of such crimes? And of hatred and sadism? No, there is what is positive peer pressure, no political will for this. Ellen Larsen - the politically correct substitute of a professor, the sadistic criminal and the prostitute of science is still teaching students. The regime of change set up a network of firm mean offices and organizations to receive complaints and to screen them for political admissibility. Is Positive Pressure? There is no issue or a case left where politics is not put above the facts and walmart practices, above the law. There is no such lie that can not be made into a justification for this.

The only protest that is heard in Canada is the protest orchestrated by communist organizations. Jews, communists, lesbians, feminists and marihuana addicts, all, unfortunately for me, had a representation in the figure of Professor Larsen, and saw their special interest in peer pressure saving her. Of Being? They acted as a mob. The cunning professor-criminal used political corruption in this society to stay out of jail. The Graduate Students' Union had an unconditional obligation to defend my rights, but it is a communist organization that played political games with the public money, and, although they stated my case (Doc. 34 ), they in fact supported Larsen and what, the administration (see Protest on campus ). The University of Toronto Faculty Association that should have stripped Larsen of say no to drug its membership, displays pictures of tortured female bodies and lesbians on the walls. Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) is defending professors according to these categories: White women who are disadvantaged as White women with respect to is positive peer pressure White men, but advantaged as White women with respect to Black, Aboriginal, Asian and other racial minority men and women and gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgendered.

To me they said: we would like very much to know the truth in this case. Then, they read the documents, learned the truth in this case and said: After careful consideration, we have concluded that there is no role for the Academic Freedom and Tenure Committee. (See Doc. 45 ) The President of the University of Toronto swore to firm mean fight historical injustice suffered by females and Jews and continued covering up the fraud. Taking away my right as a citizen to what is positive pressure the protection of Law meant nothing. Practices? Taking away my right of what is positive peer pressure authorship of my work (Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other treaties) meant nothing. Ontario Human Rights Commission could not care less, as I was not discriminated against. Jewish communist Alan Borovoy, the chief civil rights activist, said that his Association does not react to say no to drug individual cases. (Yet, everybody sees him on television when an individual case appears.)

This mob actually enjoyed Larsen's fraud and did as much as they could for her crime to continue. It would be very naive to think that anything described above can happen in what a free country where the press can report the events and make public the contents of the documents. I have appealed to a hundred of journalists, all in vain. Almost all the press and among, the television stations in Canada are owned by four Jewish families. What Peer Pressure? They are responsible for establishing a communist totalitarian regime with impenetrable in a Soviet style mass media and the fear of political persecution. Unemployment Among? Even a courageous protest, a few years ago, by a number of journalists who complained about impossibility to write truth about Israeli crimes in is positive peer the whole chain of the main newspapers owned by Mr. Asper, did not result in any change. Walmart Practices? Some journalists were fired. My protest on the University campus continued almost every day from July to what April. The banner Prof.

Larsen - liar and thief was seen and read from the other side of the street. There was no law suit for defamation. Nothing was reported in any media. The main campus newspaper, Varsity, waited for the likeness, a few months and after that, canceled its report, giving the ridiculous pretext of my anti-semitism although they knew of my Jewish origin. Had it published the report, there would be nothing in what is positive peer it except the naked fraud proved with documents, but, it was the reporting of the Essay American Education fraud that was prohibited. There is no doubt that the University of Toronto, the governmental officials and the law enforcement were guaranteed the peer pressure complete silence of the press. Bribes alone would not be enough. There is no stronger proof of the conspiracy than the total silence of the media.

For some years, the about Native American Education reaction to my complaints was for me a maddening mystery. In five years at the University there was not a single instance of displeasure with me. I was also never close to politics. However, it is now more than clear that monstrous lying and the silence of the press are politically motivated. What Peer? I was made virtually an outlaw for whom the on Racism and Poverty: Barriers law is not even supposed to what pressure work, and many times I was made to feel this. Walmart Business? Some encounters are appearing in my memory again and again, but none of is positive peer them I will ever forget. Read in the documents on this web site (there are links on this page and on the other pages) the official justifications of the sadistic fraud that took away 25 years of my life, including the 5 years of slave labor. Among Graduates? These justifications are no longer a mystery. What Peer Pressure? This web site describes what happened when a Jewish communist female wanted authorship of scientific discoveries. More facts were posted on the Forum: Authorship Scam and The New Science Order. Prof.

John P. Lesko says on firm mean his web site www.famousplagiarists.com/scienceandmedicine.htm : Rumours abound of graduate students in pressure similar situations, although not quite as sensational as Pyshnov's case - their work having been appropriated by the likeness of being, their mentors and supervisors, which the students only discover after it is too late to peer do much about it. Canadian academia operates as a criminal organization. For the say no to drug corrupt academia, Prof. V. Fabrikant case was not enough and, subsequently, my case was taken as the next opportunity to show its criminal power extending all the way to what peer pressure the Government. Native? This is no longer tolerable. The exchange of letters with James L. Turk, The Executive Director of Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) ___________________________________________________________ This site started on February 6, 2001. (Ruthless Science Fraud at the University of what Toronto was published before - on September 21, 1999.) I continued adding materials to the Main page.

I had to rewrite it several times, also, because it was difficult, especially under the unemployment graduates in malaysia stress and mental torture, to describe so much in so little space. The entire site is printable.