Order Essay -
Contingency factors influencing the availability of
Nov 13, 2017 Contingency factors, buy essay uk -
Business Review Letters And Request Letters. 17-1 The Clearing House Payments Company LLC (TCH) 16-1 Amadeus Group, LLC and Mystic Logistics, LLC. Contingency! 15-1 Institute of Electrical and the main objective layout Electronics Engineers, Incorporated (IEEE) 14-1 Flexi-Van Leasing Inc. and contingency Direct ChassisLink Inc. 14-2 CyberPoint International (BR) 13-1 Columbia Fuel Services, Inc. (CFS) and Lanmar Aviation, Inc. (LA) 13-2 Greater New York Hospital Association (GNYHA) 13-3 Intellectual Property Exchange International Inc. (IPXI) 12-1 STARS Alliance LLC (STARS) 12-2 STARS Alliance LLC (STARS) 11-1 Producers Guild of America (PGA) 11-2 Worker Rights Consortium (WRC) (* Inadvertently omitted from 1997 Reviews, see 1998 Reviews.) 10-2 Associated Press.
10-3 Pacific Business Group on Health. 09-1 Memorial Health, Inc. and wet granulation St. Joseph's/Candler Health System. 09-2 The Reliance Network. Factors! 08-1 Media Rating Council (MRC) 08-2 External Compliance Officer, Inc. Industrialised Nations! (ECO) 08-3 CEO Roundtable on Cancer (CRC) 08-4 RFID Consortium LLC (Consortium) 08-5 Ivy Capital Group, LLC (Ivy) 07-1 National Association of Small Trucking Companies (NASTC) and contingency factors Bell Company. Industrialised Nations! 07-2 Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) and contingency Its Standards Association (IEEE-SA) 07-3 Advanced Energy Consortium (AEC)
06-1 American Peanut Shellers Association (APSA) 06-2 Fair Factories Clearinghouse (FFC) 06-3 Linen Systems for Healthcare, LLC. Negative Of Corporal! 06-4 American Trucking Associations, Inc. Contingency! (ATA) 06-5 VMEbus International Trade Association (VITA) 06-6 Southeastern Public Service Authority (SPSA) 05-1 MediaNews Group, Inc., the Condition of AIDS Denver News Agency (DNA), and E.W. Scripps Co. 04-1 Internationally Board-Certified Lactation Consultants. Contingency Factors! 03-1 Brochem Marketing, Inc. Ferrous! 03-2 Woodwork Institute of factors California (WIC) 03-3 The National Cable Television Cooperative, Inc.(NCTC) 02-1 Washington State Medical Association (WSMA) 02-2 The American Welding Society. 02-3 The Consortium (Free Electronic Tax Services) 02-4 3G Patent Platform Partnership.
02-5 National Consumer Telecommunications Data Exchange (NCTDE) 02-6 American Trucking Associations (ATA) 02-7 Michigan Hospital Group, Inc. Material! (MHG) 01-1 Arkansas Electric Cooperative Corporation (AECC) 01-2 Delta Airlines, Inc. and Societe Air France. Contingency Factors! 01-3 Truckload Carriers Association (TCA) 01-4 Transportation Services, Inc.(TSI) 01-5 Promotion Marketing Association (PMA) 01-6 Olympus America Inc. (OAI) and C.R. Objective Of Retail Layout Is To! Bard, Inc. Contingency Factors! 01-7 Rio Grande Eye Associates, P.A. Criterion Based! (RGEA) 01-8 Foss Maritime Company, Crescent Towing Company, Inc., et al.
01-9 Association of Fund-Raising Distributors and Suppliers (AFRDS) 00-1 Midwest Behavioral Healthcare LLC (MBH) 00-2 Pollock Conservation Cooperative (PCC) 00-3 Akutan Catcher Vessel Association (ACVA) 00-4 Offshore Pollock Catchers Cooperative (OPCC) 00-5 Containers America LLC. 00-6 Apparel Industry Partnership (AIP) 00-7 UniSea Fleet Cooperative. Factors! 00-8 Northern Victor Cooperative. Of Corporal! 00-9 The Arctic Enterprise Association. Contingency! 00-10 The Peter Pan Fleet Cooperative. 00-11 The Westward Fleet Cooperative. Ferrous Material! 00-12 Unalaska Fleet Cooperative.
00-13 The Mothership Fleet Cooperative. 00-14 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. (EPRI) 00-15 Carrier Credit Services, Inc. Factors! (CCS) 99-1 NSM Purchasing Association. Nations! 99-2 Hitachi, Ltd., Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd., et al. 99-3 Western Systems Coordinating Council (WSCC) 99-4 Preferred Physicians Medical Group (PPMG) 99-5 Securities Industry Association (SIA) 98-A* Apparel Industry Partnership. Contingency! (* Inadvertently omitted from 1996 Reviews.) 98-B* National Elevator Industry, Inc. Criterion! (NEII) (* Inadvertently omitted from 1997 Reviews.) 98-C* MPEG LA, L.L.C., et al. Contingency! (* Inadvertently omitted from 1997 Reviews, see 1998 Reviews.) 98-1 Depot Direct, Inc. Criterion Based Assessment! 98-2 Keystone and Conemaugh Electric Power Plants. 98-3 Interactive Travel Services Association.
98-4 Armored Transport Alliance (ATA) 98-5 American Heart Association (AHA) Pharmaceutical Roundtable. 98-6 Personal Communications Industry Association (PCIA) 98-7 Securities Industry Association (SIA) 98-8 National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) 98-9 Textile Energy Association (TEA) 98-10 The Heritage Alliance (THA) and contingency Lackawanna Physicians Organization (LPO) 98-11 Koninklijke Philips Electronics, N.V., Sony Corporation of wet granulation Japan and factors Pioneer Electronic Corporation of Japan. 98-12 Association of criterion based assessment Independent Corrugated Converters (AICC) 97-1 DataCheck, Inc. Contingency Factors! 97-2 The Lawyers' Group. 97-3 Marin General Hospital and the main layout Ross Hospital. 97-4 Santa Fe Managed Care Organization (SFMCO) 97-5 CVT Surgical Center (CVT) Vascular Surgery Association of Baton Rouge (VSA)
97-6 Orthopaedic Associates of Mobile, P.A. and Bone Joint Center of Mobile (BJ) 97-7 Petroleum EP Research Cooperative. Factors! 97-8 Whiting Conservation Cooperative (WCC) 97-9 Russell-Stanley Corporation. 98-B* National Elevator Industry, Inc. Wet Granulation! (NEII) (* Inadvertently omitted from 1997 Reviews, see 1998 Reviews.) 97-10 Southwest Orthopedic Specialists (SOS) 98-C* MPEG LA, L.L.C., et al. (* Inadvertently omitted from 1997 Reviews, see 1998 Reviews.) 97-11 Gastroenterology Associates, Ltd., GI Associates, P.C., and contingency factors Valley Gastroenterologists. 97-12 Post-Tensioning Institute (PTI) 97-13 Vermont Physicians Clinic (VPC) 97-14 National Consumer Telecommunications Data Exchange, Inc. (NCTDE) 97-15 First Priority Health (FPH) and NEPPO Ltd. 97-16 California Large Electric Power Purchasing Association (CLEPPA) 96-1 Oklahoma Physicians Network (OPN) and wet granulation PROklahoma Care, Inc. 96-2 Automated Interchange Matching System, Inc. Factors! (AIMS) 96-3 Southwest Power Pool, Inc. (SPP) 96-4 Intermodal Committee on Efficiency (ICE) 96-5 Children's Healthcare P.A. (CHPA) 96-6 Southern Health Corporation (SHC) 96-7 Orange Los Angeles Medical Group, Inc. Wet Granulation! (ORLA) 96-8 Allergy Asthma Consultants, Inc. (AAC) 96-9 Itasca Clinic and factors Grand Rapids Medical Association (GRMA) 96-10 Pentagon Federal Credit Union. 96-11 Hospice Network of New Jersey, Inc. 96-12 Baker Hughes Inteq, Dresser Industries, Inc., and based M-1 Drilling Fluids.
96-13 Transportation Claims and contingency factors Prevention Council, Inc. (TCPC) 96-14 Independent Automotive Damage Appraisers Association (IADAA) 96-15 Plastic Surgery Associates of negative effects of corporal Connecticut, LLC (PSAC) 96-16 Allied Colon and Rectal Specialists (ACRS) 96-17 Primary Specialist Medical Center L.L.C. (PSMC) 96-18 Utilities Service Alliance (USA) 96-19 El Paso Surgical Group (EPSG) 96-20 Sierra CommCare, Inc. 96-21 Cincinnati Regional Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Associates, Inc. Contingency Factors! (CROSMA) 96-22 Home Care Alliance, Inc. Essay And The Of AIDS! 96-23 Anne Arundel Medical Center (AAMC) 98-A* Apparel Industry Partnership. (* Inadvertently omitted from 1996 Reviews, see 1998 Reviews.) 96-24 RWHC Network, Inc. 95-1 Southern California Independent Lennox Dealers (SCILD) 95-2 Intermodal Council of the American Trucking Associations, Inc. Factors! (ATA) 95-3 Association of Independent Television Stations, Inc. (INTV) 95-4 Northwestern National Life Insurance Company (NWNL) 95-5 Hillhaven Corporation. 95-6 Mid-South Physician Alliance Inc. and Mid-South Health Plan. 95-7 AdviNet Inc. 95-8 Business Travel Contractors Corporation (BTCC) 95-9 Pennsylvania Orthotics Prosthetics Enterprise (POPE) 95-10 Promotion Marketing Association of wet granulation America (PMAA) 95-11 American Society of contingency Composers, Authors and Publishers, (ASCAP), Broadcast Music Inc. (BMI), and SESAC Inc.
95-12 National Court Reporters Association (NCRA) 95-13 Hanger Orthopedic Group, Inc. 95-14 Metal Building Manufacturers Association (MBMA) 95-15 Halon Recycling Corporation (HRC) 95-16 South Carolina Dermatologists. 95-17 Southwest Oncology Group. 95-18 Georgia Preferred Podiatric Medical Network. 95-19 Dermnet, Inc. 95-20 Preferred Laboratory Access Network (PLAN) 94-1 Insurance Services Office, Inc. (ISO) 94-2 Association of Independent Television Stations, Inc. (INTV) 94-3 National Association of effects Credit Management (NACM) 94-4 Bay Area Business Group on Health (BBGH) 94-5 New Jersey Hospital Association (NJHA) 94-6 National Telecommunications Data Exchange, Inc. Contingency! (NTDE) 94-7 Houston Health Care Coalition. 94-8 Automobile Transport Fleet Affiliation (ATFA) 94-9 Fuel Cell Commercialization Group (FCCG) 94-10 Hotel Employees and wet granulation Restaurant Employees International Union Welfare Fund.
94-11 Annapolis Bank and Trust Co., et al. Factors! 94-12 Birmingham Cooperative Clinical Benchmarking Demonstration Project. 94-13 Seeskin, Paas, Blackburn and Company (SPB) (February 21, 1994) 94-14 Portable Power Equipment Manufacturers Association (PPEMA) 94-15 Collaborative Provider Organization, Inc. (CPO) 94-16 Compensation Practices Committee. 94-17 Preferred Podiatric Network Inc. 94-18 Mortgage Asset Research Institute, Inc. (MARI)
94-19 International Chiropractor's Association of California ICAC) 94-20 Physician Care, Inc. The Main Objective Layout Is To! 94-21 Pulmonary Associates, Ltd. and Albuquerque Pulmonary Consultants, P.A. 94-22a Burley Stabilization Corporation. 94-22b Burley Tobacco Growers Cooperative Association. 94-22c Flue-Cured Tobacco Cooperative Stabilization Corporation. 94-23 Chicagoland Radiological Network (CRN) 93-1 Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine and University Hospitals of Cleveland (UHC) 93-3 Auto Shippers Efficiency Committee. 93-4 Smokeless Tobacco Manufacturers.
93-6 Fishermen's Marketing Association, Inc. (FMA) 93-7 Nickel Users Purchasing Association, Inc. (NUPA) 93-8 Colorado Asphalt Producers Association (CAPA) 93-9 Halon Recycling Corporation (HRC) 93-10 Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC) 93-11 National Cardiovascular Network Inc. (NCN) 93-12 Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (PMA) 93-13 The Health and Personal Care Distribution Conference Inc. (HPCDC) 93-14 Saint Anthony Medical Center. 93-15 The Western Railroad Traffic Association (WRTA), Consolidated Rail Corporation, and CSX Corporation. Contingency Factors! 93-16 Household Goods Forwarders Association of America, Inc. The Main Of Retail Is To! (HHGFAA) 93-17 South Suburban Bar Association. 93-18 American Society of factors Travel Agents Inc. (ASTA) 93-19 California Chiropractic Association (CCA) 93-20 The Newspaper Association of material America. 92-1 Experience Information Bureau Inc. Factors! (EIB) 92-2 Affiliated Distributors.
Contingency theory - Wikipedia
Pay for Exclusive Essay -
What Is a Contingency Factor? | Chron com
Nov 13, 2017 Contingency factors, order essays online: no plagiarism and top quality -
LEEWS (Law Essay Exam Writing/Preparation Science/System) changes the game! A proven effective (true) science of contingency factors preparing for and executing the A essay exam, LEEWS is applicable to bar as well as law school exams. Unique, proven systems are put in place for (systematically!) identifying issues [No more haphazard spotting!], presenting analysis in concise paragraphs (roughly one per issue), briefing cases in 2-4 lines(!!), taking far fewer class notes, and compiling condensed, effective, 30-50 page course outlines. And much more. A law student learnsfinallyto learn/think as a reasonable facsimile of a [practicing] lawyer. I briefed, outlined my notes, reviewed the law, but still felt totally unprepared for upcoming exams. This program was exactly what I needed the tools to confidently tackle exams in a methodical way. Jan Court, Univ Texas '00. Just knowing you have a plan i.e., the steps keeps you from worrying about Essay on HIV and the, panic. Rob Goldbaum, U. Chicago '92. 3 Sample Law Essay Exams From the contingency factors LEEWS Primer (with Model Responses) [And an example of criterion assessment LEEWS' effectiveness in contingency, practice.]
1 Actual Civil Procedure Exam With Model Response (written by a LEEWS grad) and negative effects of corporal Professor Comments. The entire grade (!!) in most law school courses will depend upon performance on a final exam, most if not all of contingency which is essay in nature. (You are basically asked to identify and analyze so-called issues generated in a hypothetical [made up] and wet granulation usually complex fact pattern, much as a lawyer might.) Most exams are 3-4 hours in length, and either closed or open book. The former means you bring nothing into the exam with you (save the code in a course based on a code of contingency factors rules [e.g., IRS Code in taxation, Federal Rules of industrialised nations Civil Procedure in civil procedure]). Normally open book allows you to bring in class notes, textbook, outlines, whatever, which tends to reassure students. However, open book is misleading, as there is typically little time to contingency factors, refer to aids. Industrialised Nations! Open or closed book, the law you need to know should be in your head. Some professors offer take home exams, which may have 8-24 hour time limits, and limits as to how much you can write or type. Contingency! Grading is invariably anonymous to protect professors and students alike.
Unlike college and graduate school, class participation, acquaintance with the professor, even midsemester (as opposed to layout, midyear) midterms generally have no bearing on law school grades. Contingency Factors! Ask professors themselves, or upperclass students about the grading policies and practices of wet granulation individual professors. There follow three examples of essay hypotheticals selected from among the eight in the appendix of the LEEWS Primer. Contingency! Following are models of the LEEWS approach to breaking fact patterns down into wet granulation, units corresponding to relevant issues [Planning Phase], as well as fully developed written responses corresponding to our format of concise paragraphs, roughly one per issue [Writing Phase]. The law needed to address each hypo is provided, as the subjects may as yet be unfamiliar to you. You may want to attempt a response before looking at contingency the models. Standard exam writing advice posits that you follow IRAC. I.e., identify the Issue, state the applicable Rule, Analyze, Conclude. (Sounds great, until you realize you don't know what an issue is, much less how to identify all issues lurking in of retail is to, the fact pattern; you don't know how to analyze as a lawyer; and you don't know how to present analysis concisely.) Whether you are familiar with the three subjects tested or no, all essay exercises are predictable in nature. A typically complex and confusing fact pattern is followed by factors, question(s)/instruction(s) that in effect require you to identify or spot the legal issues that would be of the main of retail layout interest to a judge or lawyer.
You must then resolve those issues, bringing to bear relevant law and the analytic dialectic between law and facts known as lawyerlike thinking. Should you find yourself thinking, as you review the model responses, I don't think I can ever do that, unless you have a knack for taking such exams (possessed by only a small handful of contingency students -- 5-7%, even at Harvard), you are probably correct. Which is why so few law students manage even a single A on final exams. But rest assured that anyone with reasonable intelligence and diligence can produce such responses consistently. Based Assessment! Showing you how is factors, what LEEWS is all about -- for any exam in any subject, no matter the question(s)/instruction(s) posed by the professor. Civil Procedure Hypothetical (60 min.) Coris Becker, an occasional tennis player, fell while descending steps at negative effects of corporal the Only For Us Racquet Club in Long Island City, Queens County, New York.
As she explained to factors, her husband moments later by Essay on HIV and the Condition, phone: Not the most graceful move in the world, Morris. I got so mad, I smashed Mommy's new titanium Stroker. Factors! Be a dear and bring home din-din. I'm going to be in the hot tub for wet granulation, hours. As she limped out to her Lexus, Coris ran into the club owner, Jett Setter. He grinned and remarked, I saw that spill, Coris.
Not the most graceful move in the world. At which point Coris determined to sue Setter personally, as well as the club. Although a resident of factors Queens County, Coris, joined by her mother, Doris, a resident of Manhattan, New York County, brought suit against Only For Us Racquet Club, Inc. (OFU, Inc.) and Jett Setter personally in New York County, seeking damages for ferrous material, Coris' injury and the destruction of the tennis racquet. Thereupon followed, inter alia , the following events and motions: 1 OFU, Inc. and Setter moved for a change of venue to Queens County.
2 Attempts to serve Setter personally at his club were twice unsuccessful, so a copy of the summons and complaint was affixed to the door of his home. Another was mailed to contingency, him. [So-called nail and mail service.] 3 Although the complaint affixed to his door separated from the summons and blew away, and the mailed copy never arrived, Setter, by his attorney, appeared in the action, answered the complaint, interposed affirmative defenses, and otherwise defended against the action. Only later during an appeal did he assert lack of personal jurisdiction as a defense. 4 OFU, Inc. served notice of the deposition of a person who, while standing in the next phone booth, had overheard Coris' conversation with her husband.
Coris moved for a protective order forbidding disclosure of material anything overheard as a privileged conversation. 5 OFU, Inc. requested an admission from Doris that Coris has a tendency to negligent behavior. Contingency! Doris ignored it. 6 Following a directed verdict during trial dismissing her cause of action for destruction of the racquet, Doris immediately instituted a claim for damages on the same ground in small claims court, Manhattan. You are a law clerk to, where appropriate, both trial and of retail appellate judges assigned to this case. Prepare a memorandum of law respecting the issues raised in contingency, the above. Majority state law applies.
RELEVANT LEGAL PRINCIPLES FOR CIVIL PROCEDURE HYPO. (Such legal knowledge should be in your head as well as your course outline. Note: The law provided herein may or may not be currently accurate.) Discovery (scope of) Generally, all information not otherwise privileged that is relevant to the subject matter of the action is ferrous, discoverable, whether or not the material would be admissible as proof. Communications between spouses A confidential communication between husband and wife is privileged against disclosure by either spouse or by a third person (e.g., an eavesdropper). Personal Jurisdiction Generally, in contingency, order to determine the rights and material duties of factors parties to an action, and to bind the parties personally to its determinations, a court must have in personam jurisdiction over said parties. Said jurisdiction will be had, inter alia, where a defendant is and the of AIDS, present in the state where an action is brought, and personally served with process. Contingency Factors! Where personal service on a defendant cannot be effected through due diligence, a plaintiff is entitled to based assessment, substitute such service by affixing a copy of the factors summons and complaint to the door or other conspicuous place at the defendant's last known address, and also mailing a copy of same by Essay on HIV Condition, regular mail to factors, said address (so-called nail and mail). A court has held that three attempts at in hand service at objective layout is to a defendant's place of business, without attempting to serve the defendant at home or leave the summons and complaint with a person of suitable age and discretion at the place of contingency business does not satisfy the requirements of due diligence.
Waiver of Where a defendant appears, answers the complaint, interposes defenses, and at no time during or after trial moves to dismiss based on, nor claims lack of personal jurisdiction, the defense will be deemed waived on appeal. Requests for admission A request for admission imposes a duty on the party served to ferrous, acknowledge the existence of facts that are not in doubt and that should not be necessary to prove at trial. The party served normally has 30 days to respond. Failure to timely respond results in the matter being deemed admitted. Inter alia , it is permissible to request that a party admit to a legal conclusion (e.g., that an factors, employee was acting with authority, or that the party was traveling against traffic on a one-way street).
However, it is not proper to request an admission to an abstract statement of law (e.g., that allowing a minor without a license to drive is negligent, per se). Res Judicata Doctrine that for reasons of economy, prevention of harassment, and avoidance of inconsistent judicial rulings (policy!), the relitigation of claims and issues is material, generally prohibited. Claim preclusion Doctrine whereby a final judgment on the merits of a claim or cause of action precludes reassertion of that claim or cause of action in a subsequent suit. Venue Refers to the proper place for trial of a lawsuit. Contingency! The purpose of venue rules is to industrialised, prevent a plaintiff from forcing a defendant to trial where it would be burdensome for him to appear and defend (policy!). Unless compelling reasons exist to direct otherwise, a transitory action (meaning that the transaction which is the contingency factors subject of the action could have happened anywhere) should be tried in the county where the action arose. MODEL RESPONSE TO CIVIL PROCEDURE HYPOTHETICAL. (1/4 - 1/3 of allotted time divided into 10-15 minute intervals) Preliminary Overview Six distinct events/motions.
Perform Steps One, Two, and Three (The Blender) on each is Essay and the Condition of AIDS, my initial perspective on how to proceed. [Always the Steps, always the Steps a constant way of thinking.] Step One [Conflict pairings and party objective(s) for each of the six events/motions.] The conflict pairings for all six are either Coris and/or Doris versus OFU, Inc. Contingency! and/or Jett Setter. [The consistent overall objectives are to obtain damages on one side and to avoid liability on the other. However, given that this is a civil procedure exam, the objectives that count for purposes of generating premises are intermediate in nature. In the Essay and the larger (intermediate) sense they are to keep the litigation going versus termination on a procedural ground. More immediate to the six events/motions:] 1 = Change venue to Queens County vs. keep it in Manhattan County. 2 = Establish personal jurisdiction vs. not.
3 = Have lack of personal jurisdiction defense ruled moot vs. exists and viable. 4 = Preclude disclosure of overheard conversation vs. have it ruled discoverable. 5 = Have fact admitted vs. not admitted. 6 = Have claim heard in small claims court vs. Factors! dismissed. [My view at this point is that each event/motion will generate no more than one or two premises, and will be relatively straightforward of industrialised analysis. Therefore, the time to be allotted each will be roughly the same. As it would interrupt continuity of contingency factors train of thought and be time wasting to continue applying the Steps to all six, from this point on I shall work on each question to completion before going on to the next .] Step Two [Consider each pairing, party, and objective. Cull facts (and course outline) for relevant premises.] 1 = Venue of transitory action is overriding , (i.e., governs the Essay of AIDS determination, no matter which party's perspective/objective is contingency, considered. See definition of Essay on HIV Condition of AIDS Step Two and footnote, page 104.)
2 = Nail and mail service vs. due diligence rule. [Complete analysis/discussion of No.2 (7-8 minutes??), then on to No.3; . . Contingency! . No.4; . . Negative Effects Punishment! . 5; . . . 6.] 3 = Rule re lack of personal jurisdiction and factors grounds for waiver thereof overrides. 4 = Rule re discovery of spousal communication overrides. 5 = Requests for admission, and failure to respond thereto overrides. 6 = Res judicata rules override. Step Three [Consider each premise to based, note missing elements or real issues.] [Since there appear to contingency factors, be but one or two premises to be considered for of corporal, each event/motion, and since I am working on contingency, each exclusive of the others, Step Three is unnecessary as an independent exercise. It is part and parcel of inspecting the law giving rise to the premise under consideration to determine whether it is necessary to state all of the law to begin the first paragraph of analysis, or whether one or more elements can be focused on as pivotal.] Preview of a logical sequence for discussion No overlap of discussion apparent. No reason apparent not to proceed in the chronology given.
[When question(s)/instruction(s) offer a labeling format, you of negative punishment course normally use it. The professor/bar grader will likely be looking for it (Here -- 1,2,3, etc. It seems unnecessary, time wasting, and probably confusing to mention conflict pairings here. However, I am thinking of and guided by them.] Generally, unless compelling reasons exist to direct otherwise, a transitory action [flag relevant law with underlining or boldface] should be tried in the county where the contingency action arose. The Main Of Retail Layout Is To! Transitory has been defined to mean that the transaction that is the subject of the action could have occurred anywhere. Coris' fall and the destruction of the factors racquet could have occurred anywhere. [Concludes statement of relevant premise, i.e., controlling legal precept, that abruptly begins every paragraph.] Moreover, Coris, Only For Us, Inc. (OFU), and Jett Setter all reside in Queens County. Wet Granulation! The residence in New York County of Coris' mother, Doris, whose claim is minor, is the only apparent reason for trying the action in New York County.
It is hardly compelling. Factors! [Concludes lawyerlike analysis -- application of law to relevant facts.] Conclusion : The motion should be granted. Criterion Based Assessment! [No hedging, as this seems open and shut.] So-called nail and factors mail service will satisfy the requirements of personal jurisdiction only where personal service on a defendant cannot be effected through due diligence. [Law.] It has been held that three attempts at the main layout is to in hand service at contingency a defendant's place of business, without attempting to industrialised, serve the defendant at home or leave the summons and complaint with a person of suitable age and discretion at contingency the place of negative effects punishment business does not satisfy the requirements of due diligence. Plaintiffs made no attempt to serve defendant Setter personally other than twice unsuccessfully at contingency his place of the main objective of retail is to business. [Analysis.] Conclusion: The attempted nail and factors mail service was likely [Hedging!] ineffective for the main layout, lack of due diligence.
Where a defendant who has not been properly served nevertheless appears in an action, answers the complaint, and interposes affirmative defenses, but never moves to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, nor at any time claims lack of personal jurisdiction, the defense of lack of factors personal jurisdiction will be deemed waived upon the taking of an appeal. [Law.] Setter, as concluded above, was never properly served. Nevertheless, he appeared, answered the complaint, defended in the action, and at no time prior to appeal claimed lack of personal jurisdiction. Arguably, raising the material claim on appeal is after trial. However, waived upon factors the taking of an appeal clearly indicates that the time for raising the claim would be deemed tolled. [Analysis.] Conclusion : Setter's defense of lack of personal jurisdiction would be deemed waived on appeal. Generally, all information that is not privileged and objective layout is relevant to contingency factors, the subject matter of the action is discoverable, even if not admissible as proof. Effects Punishment! Confidential communications between husband and wife are privileged from disclosure by either spouse and by a third party (e.g., an eavesdropper). [Law.] Coris' statement that she had smashed the racquet was relevant for its truth, as well as an indication of contingency factors Coris' truthfulness. Confidential normally implies private or secret. [Add clarification, or law, where needed, and appropriate.] A conversation at a phone that was apparently near other phones would not seem confidential. Moreover, given that Coris had not yet determined to sue, her statement in the context of remarks about dinner and a hot tub seems merely casual. [Analysis.]
Conclusion : The motion will fail. The conversation with the husband was not confidential, and therefore not privileged. A request for negative effects of corporal, an admission imposes a duty on the party served to acknowledge the existence of facts that are not in doubt and that should not be necessary to prove at trial. However, inter alia, it is not proper to factors, request an admission to an abstract statement of law (e.g., that allowing a minor without a license to drive is negligent, per se). The statement in question seems manifestly a matter that is in some doubt, and that may be necessary to prove at trial. Moreover, in that negligence is a legal conclusion, the statement would appear to be an abstract statement of law. Conclusion : Doris' disregard of the request is of no consequence, as said request imposed no duty of acknowledgment.
A final judgment on the merits of a claim or cause of action generally precludes reassertion of that claim or cause of industrialised action in a subsequent suit. Doris' action in small claims court is grounded in contingency factors, the same facts (destroyed tennis racquet) and sets forth the same cause of and the Condition action as the one dismissed in the primary action herein. A directed verdict during trial seems both a final judgment and a judgment on the merits. Conclusion : The action in small claims court would be dismissed as res judicata. Corporations Hypothetical (50 min.) The RIP Corporation, formed in 1998 by the Bottomline brothers, Ohmy, Padthe, and Savethe, for the purpose (as duly set forth in its bylaws and articles of incorporation) of factors manufacturing and retailing so-called landscape rape accessories for four wheel drive and other off-the-road vehicles, quickly prospered and went public. Between 1999, when 100,000 shares were first sold over the counter, and of retail layout 2001 the total value of RIPCORP (as the enterprise was affectionately known) shares, after two splits, rose tenfold to forty million dollars. Flush with their success and invincible in their avarice, the Bottomline brothers led RIPCORP in the aggressive pursuit of contingency factors profit wherever it might be found.
The brothers held the chief executive positions in the corporation, as well as a majority of seats on the board of directors. They further owned thirty percent of the outstanding shares, by effects punishment, far the largest voting block. Thus, acquiescence in their increasingly bold ventures was virtually assured. Matters began to tangle when Meddle, a shareholder of record since purchasing 100 shares at the initial offering, took umbrage at RIPCORP's proposed acquisition of Southeast Asia ski resort options. In the fall of 2001 Meddle sought permission to inspect the RIPCORP minutes and other records relating to the ski resort venture.
When she refused to accede to the demand of the Bottomline brothers that she first divulge her intentions regarding the inspection, the brothers issued a directive limiting access to factors, the books and records to persons cleared by them, and under no circumstances to Meddle or her representative. Thereupon Meddle brought suit in her own right and on behalf of wet granulation RIPCORP against the corporation and the Bottomline brothers personally to gain access to the books and factors records, to block the ski resort venture as an industrialised nations, ultra vires act, and for repayment by contingency, the RIPCORP board of directors of wet granulation any expenses incurred in contingency, connection with the criterion based pursuit of said venture. Contingency! 1) RIPCORP moved to dismiss the action for, inter alia, lack of standing, failure to first make a demand on the board of directors, and failure to state a cause of action. 2) RIPCORP moved in the alternative that the court require Meddle to post $25,000 security for costs as a precondition to continued maintenance of the suit. Negative Effects Of Corporal Punishment! 3) Meanwhile, the RIPCORP board passed a resolution providing for contingency factors, indemnification of the directors in the event Meddle prevailed, and purchased insurance to provide for same.
Meddle immediately moved to quash these actions. How should the court decide the the main objective layout is to motions under 1, 2, and 3 above? RELEVANT LEGAL PRINCIPLES FOR CORPORATIONS HYPO. Ultra vires acts Generally includes acts beyond the contingency purpose or powers of the corporation, and sometimes includes acts within the purposes and powers of the corporation, but performed in an unauthorized manner or without authority. Of Retail Layout! Many jurisdictions now restrict ultra vires challenges to factors, the following: 1) the right of a shareholder to enjoin unauthorized corporate acts; 2) the right of the attorney general of the state to enjoin such activities; 3) the right of the corporation to recover damages from the on HIV of AIDS officers and/or directors (present or former) responsible for the ultra vires act(s). Contingency Factors! Shareholder inspection rights Generally, shareholders have a limited right, founded in common law and statute, to on HIV and the of AIDS, inspect corporate books and records which are relevant to contingency, a proper purpose. Courts will determine whether a purpose is proper. A shareholder may examine the stock book and minutes of stockholder meetings on demand if 1) he has been a stockholder of record for at wet granulation least six months immediately preceding the demand; or 2) he is a holder of 5 percent of any class of outstanding shares. Shareholder rights of action Generally, a shareholder may sue the corporation in his own name to enforce his rights as a shareholder, and/or on contingency, behalf of the corporation to procure a judgment in favor of the corporation. The latter derivative action may be maintained only if 1) the plaintiff is a shareholder when the action is brought; 2) the plaintiff was a shareholder when the alleged wrong to the corporation occurred; and 3) the plaintiff shows in his complaint that he has demanded that the ferrous board of directors commence the action, or that there are sufficient reasons for not making the demand (e.g., the board members are the defendants). Note that in order to minimize the possibility of contingency factors derivative actions without merit being brought merely for nuisance value settlements or counsel fee awards, the corporation may require the nations plaintiff to post security for costs, unless 1) the plaintiff or plaintiffs hold at least 5 percent of any class of outstanding shares; or 2) the value of their shares exceeds $50,000.
Indemnification Generally, a director or officer may not be indemnified (reimbursed) against a judgment obtained against him in contingency, a direct action by the corporation, or a derivative action on behalf of the Essay and the of AIDS corporation, or for amounts paid in settlement thereof. The director may, however, be indemnified against contingency expenses of defending the action, unless, inter alia, he is adjudged to have violated his fiduciary duty of good faith and reasonable care in wet granulation, the circumstances. The corporation may purchase insurance to indemnify officers and directors for even the contingency factors above judgments, providing no deliberate dishonesty or unlawful gain on the part of the wet granulation officer/director is shown. MODEL RESPONSE TO CORPORATIONS HYPOTHETICAL. Preliminary Overview The three motions referred to by the question are like three questions, each to be considered separately. [Note the enormous benefit here of skipping over the facts.] Step One Conflict pairing(s) : [A quick review of the motions in conjunction with the contingency factors sentence that precedes them reveals the single conflict pairing throughout.] RIPCORP, Inc. v. Meddle, etc., or vice versa for each motion (i.e., question). Objectives : [Somewhat confusing, as the sentence immediately preceding the motions reflects three ultimate objectives of Meddle. However, the objectives relevant to a Step One analysis and the question are implied in the three motions. Note that motion #1 also provides Movant RIPCORP's premises (!!).
Whether the ultimate objectives will be achieved depends upon resolution of the motions.] 1) dismiss the action versus keep it going; 2) $25,000 security be required to be posted, versus not; 3) board indemnification resolution and purchase of insurance be quashed, versus maintenance of same. Step Two [RIPCORP is movant for motions 1 and 2, Meddle for 3. The motions themselves, especially the material first, point to overriding premises. In that a court may dismiss all or part of a suit, each premise must be considered in factors, light of each of effects Meddle's objectives set forth in the preceding sentence . Contingency! The facts in the first two paragraphs need only be considered for purposes of analysis.] 1) Lack of standing, failure to industrialised nations, first make a demand on the board, and failure to state a cause of action respecting each of Meddle's three objectives = potentially nine discussions. but probably not.
2) [Must refer to relevant portions of corporations toolbox.] The law [Noted in toolbox only. Don't write it in your outline.] respecting requirement that a shareholder plaintiff in action against corporation post bond. 3) The law respecting indemnification and/or insurance of directors in such a suit. Step Three [The motions seem more or less equivalent in contingency factors, weight. Given the complexity of the criterion based relevant premises noted in Step Two, the effort necessary for a Step Three analysis seems needlessly duplicative of the analysis to be performed in writing the actual response. Therefore, it seems advisable to contingency factors, skip Step Three and go to the writing phase .]
Preview of a logical sequence for discussion No reason apparent for objective of retail is to, not proceeding chronologically. Lack of standing/failure to state a cause of action. Generally, a shareholder may sue the contingency factors corporation in her own name to enforce her rights as a shareholder, and/or on industrialised nations, behalf of the corporation to procure a judgment in favor of the corporation. Inter alia, the latter derivative action can be maintained only contingency factors if the plaintiff is a shareholder when the action is brought and when the alleged wrong to the corporation occurred. Meddle (M) is currently a shareholder, and has been since long before the ski resort venture. Generally, shareholders have a limited right, founded in common law and statute, to inspect corporate books and records which are relevant to a proper purpose. Courts will determine whether a purpose is proper. A shareholder may examine the nations stock book and minutes of stockholder meetings on demand if she has been a stockholder of record for at least six months immediately preceding the demand; or she is a holder of five percent of any class of contingency outstanding shares.
M's 100 shares, presumably grown after 'two splits to 400, constitutes much less than five percent of any class of shares. However, she has been a stockholder of record since the initial offering, over criterion based, two years prior. So-called ultra vires acts acts beyond the purposes or powers of the corporation, and sometimes acts within the purposes and powers of the corporation, but performed in contingency, an unauthorized manner or without authority may properly be challenged by wet granulation, shareholders. Moreover, the factors corporation may recover damages from the officers and/or directors (present and former) responsible for the ultra vires act(s) . Ferrous! Given that RIPCORP's stated corporate purpose is to manufacture and retail accessories for off-road vehicles, the Southeast Asian ski venture (Venture) has the appearance of an ultra vires act for which damages may be sought. Failure to first make a demand on the board. Another requirement for maintaining a derivative action is factors, that the plaintiff demand that the negative effects punishment board commence the action, or there be sufficient reasons for not making such demand (e.g., the factors board members are the defendants). The Bottomline brothers are named in M's suit and objective is to hold a majority of seats on the board, thereby satisfying the exception. Conclusion : The motion should be denied, as all of RIPCORP's challenges lack merit. Corporations, in order to contingency, minimize the possibility of material derivative actions without merit being brought merely for nuisance value settlements or counsel fee awards, may require a shareholder plaintiff to contingency, post security for costs , unless the nations plaintiff or plaintiffs hold at contingency factors least five percent of any class of outstanding shares, or the value of their shares exceeds $50,000. M's 100 shares constituted but 1/10th of one percent of the wet granulation initial 100,000 share offering. Their value at the time of the suit would have been 1/10th of one percent of forty million dollars, or approximately $40,000.
However, M has been a shareholder since the very beginning of the corporation, and, as set forth, supra , a challenge to the Venture seems hardly without merit. [Yes, basic math may be necessary!] Conclusion : Although M falls $10,000 short of the $50,000 exception, the motion should probably be denied. Given that M's sharehold nearly satisfies the exception, and the policy justification underlying the security requirement seems utterly lacking, it is unlikely that a court would permit the corporation to impose this financial impediment. [Note the use of the factors policy underpinning as a basis for a counterargument.] Generally, a corporate director (or officer) may not be indemnified against based a judgment obtained against him in a direct action by the corporation or a derivative action, or for amounts paid in settlement thereof. The director may, however, be indemnified against contingency factors expenses of defending the action, unless, inter alia, he is ferrous, adjudged to have violated his fiduciary duty of good faith and contingency reasonable care in the circumstances. The corporation may purchase insurance to indemnify officers and directors for even the on HIV and the Condition above judgments, providing no deliberate dishonesty or unlawful gain on contingency factors, the part of the officer/director is shown. [Given this much legal preamble, it seems appropriate to begin the analysis in a new paragraph.] M's action is in part derivative on behalf of RIPCORP, and a judgment obtained in this respect cannot be indemnified against. The facts are unclear about whether the resolution indemnifies against expenses of defending against the action. Assuming, arguendo , that it does, the of retail layout is to inherent improbability, indeed inherent folly of the Venture, coupled with its seeming obvious ultra vires aspect, strongly suggests a violation by the directors of their duty to exercise reasonable care, if not a violation of their duty to act in good faith. Factors! However, given that RIPCORP appears to have been engaged for some time in a pattern of divers schemes wholly unrelated to its stated purpose, it is unlikely that a court would be willing to take judicial notice of such a conclusion so early in the proceedings.
Nothing in the main layout is to, the facts suggests deliberate dishonesty or unlawful gain on the part of contingency factors any RIPCORP director/officer that would preclude the purchase of criterion based indemnification insurance. Conclusion : The motion should be granted as to any portion of the resolution that purports to factors, indemnify against the main objective of retail judgments obtained on behalf of the corporation, denied as to portions that indemnify against judgments obtained by contingency, M, and the main of retail denied with leave to renew at a later time with respect to all other portions. T properly executed a will in 1994, by the terms of contingency factors which he distributed his entire estate in the following manner: First: I bequeath my racehorse, Swayback, to my friend, X. Second: I bequeath $100,000 to my brother, Y. Third: I give, devise, and based bequeath the rest, residue, and remainder of my estate to my faithful companion, Z. In 1998, having fallen out factors with Z, T properly executed a new will with the wet granulation following terms: First: I bequeath $100,000 to my brother, Y. Second: I give, devise, and contingency factors bequeath the rest, residue, and remainder of the main objective of retail is to my estate to my (new) faithful companion, B. In 1999, having reconciled with Z and spurned B, T properly executed a codicil to his 1994 will, by the terms of which he increased the legacy to Y to $150,000; and in contingency factors, all other respects he ratified, confirmed, and republished the 1994 will. T died in 2001. In a probate proceeding the evidence established the following:
1) Although sober when he made the codicil in wet granulation, 1999, T was drunk out of his mind when he executed the 1994 will. 2) T sold Swayback to a syndicate in 1997 for $200,000. 3) Inadvertently in contingency factors, 2000 T, falling asleep at his desk with cigarette in hand, set fire to some papers. One of the criterion papers destroyed was the original copy of the 1999 codicil, which T had been reviewing. 4) Y died in 2000. 5) S, the son of Y, was one of several witnesses to T's execution of the 1994 will. Discuss the rights of the contingency factors various parties in ferrous, terms of who takes what from contingency T's estate. RELEVANT LEGAL PRINCIPLES FOR WILLS HYPOTHETICAL.
Ademption Occurs when a specific legacy (defined below) is not in existence or not in the possession of the testator when he dies (because, for example, it has been sold or given away). When an assessment, ademption occurs, the legatee takes nothing. Death of factors a beneficiary A disposition to a beneficiary who predeceases the testator ordinarily lapses (returns to the estate). By statute in criterion based, many jurisdictions, however, dispositions to beneficiaries who are issue or siblings do not lapse, providing such beneficiaries have surviving issue. Such surviving issue will take the legacy in equal proportions per stirpes . Disposition of estate Shall be in contingency, accordance with a decedent's last will and testament. Execution of a will A properly executed will implies at nations least two witnesses thereto who do not stand to take under said will. Republication A properly executed codicil to factors, a revoked will operates as a republication of a will that is, in ferrous material, form, properly executed. This is so despite the fact that the will so republished may have been invalid for want of testamentary capacity at the time of making. Revocation As a general rule, a subsequent will that is entirely inconsistent with a prior will, or a later will that makes a complete disposition of the testator's property, shall be deemed to have revoked the prior will by implication.
A will may further be revoked by means of its physical destruction. Such destruction, however, must be accompanied with the contingency factors intent and for the purpose of revoking the will. Specific legacy A bequest of a particular, individualized chattel, differentiated from all other articles of the same or similar nature. It must be taken by wet granulation, the legatee as and where he finds it. Testamentary capacity Absent evidence to the contrary, testamentary capacity will be presumed where the contingency factors testator, in executing a will or other document, accurately recites the nature and extent of his property, and recognizes the natural objects of material his bounty. Witness as beneficiary A witness to a will may take under that will, providing said will can be proved in probate without his assistance. MODEL RESPONSE TO WILLS HYPOTHETICAL.
Preliminary Overview The instruction points to parties who stand to take from T's estate. Contingency Factors! Each will be in opposition to anyone or anything that would prevent him from taking from T's estate. Step One X, Y, Z, B, and A vs. anyone or thing (including each other, T, the state, or the estate) that stands between him and taking from T's estate. B v. Z seems a key conflict. Step Two [Each claimant must establish that the will or codicil upon which he bases his claim is valid and controlling. Each will likewise seek to defeat a competitor claim. Legal precepts governing testamentary disposition set forth in my wills toolbox will come into play. However, it would be inefficient and ferrous confusing to try to sort them out at this point. Better to factors, focus on one conflict at a time in the writing phase. Possibly there will be overlap of premises/discussion.] Step Three [Having declined to set forth the premises of the objective is to various parties in Step Two, I may as well go straight to the response.
My impression is that once the controlling rules are set forth, analysis will be relatively uncomplicated.] Ability of a per stirpes witness, S, to take may be an interesting discussion. Preview of a logical sequence of discussion Resolving which instrument controls seems the obvious first step. Therefore, beginning with B v. Z would seem to make sense. B and Z's rights [This label conforms to the instruction. B v. Z might confuse.
But I'm thinking B v. Z!] As a general rule, a subsequent will that is entirely inconsistent with a prior will, or a later will that makes a complete disposition of the testator's property, shall be deemed to have revoked the prior willby implication. Contingency! The 1998 will was inconsistent with the ferrous 1994 will and made a complete disposition of T's property, thereby revoking the 1994 will and Z's legacy. However, a properly executed codicil to a revoked will operates as a republication of a will that is, in form, properly executed. Contingency! This is so despite the fact that the will so republished may have been invalid for want of negative punishment testamentary capacity at the time of contingency making.
The properly executed 1999 codicil republished the properly executed 1994 will, thereby restoring Z's legacy. The fact that T was sober when making the codicil moots any effect of T having been drunk when making the 1994 will. There being no evidence to the contrary, the fact that T in executing the codicil accurately recited the nature and extent of his property and recognized the natural objects of his bounty will establish his testamentary capacity in making the codicil. Although a will may be revoked by means of physical destruction , such destruction must be accomplished with the intent and for the purpose of revoking the will. The circumstance that the original copy of the codicil was destroyed inadvertently in 2000 is thus of no avail to on HIV and the Condition, B. Conclusion : The 1998 will is revoked, and B takes nothing. Z takes the contingency rest, residue, and remainder of T's estate under the 1999 codicil that revived the 1994 will. An ademption occurs when a specific legacy (i.e., a bequest of a particular, individualized chattel, differentiated from all other articles of the same or similar nature) is not in of corporal punishment, existence or not in the possession of the testator when he dies. When an ademption occurs, the legatee takes nothing. The racehorse, Swayback, appears to factors, be such a particular, individualized chattel. In that Swayback was sold prior to T's death, the republication of the 1994 will is of no avail to X.
Conclusion : X takes nothing from T's estate, as his legacy has adeemed. A disposition to a beneficiary who predeceases the testator ordinarily lapses. By statute in many jurisdictions, however, dispositions to beneficiaries who are issue or siblings do not lapse, providing such beneficiaries have surviving issue. Such surviving issue will take the legacy in equal proportions per stirpes . Ferrous Material! Therefore, although Y predeceased T, Y's son, S, would take the $150,000, providing he is not disqualified by having witnessed the now republished 1994 will. A witness to a will may take under that will, providing said will can be proved in probate without his assistance. A properly executed will implies at least two witnesses thereto who do not stand to take under said will.
S was one of several witnesses to the 1994 will, implying that more than two persons witnessed the will. Therefore, presumably two other witnesses exist to prove the factors will in probate. NB: Arguably S should be permitted to take under the 1994 will per stirpes, even were he one of only Essay and the Condition of AIDS two witnesses to the will. The rationale for not allowing a witness necessary to contingency factors, probate to take under the will being probated is presumably the conflict of Essay and the Condition interest posed. The reliability of a witness with a vested interest in having the contingency factors will probated is compromised. Nations! Y, however, not S stood to take under the 1994 will. Had there been any consideration of Y predeceasing T, and therefore S taking, S probably would not have been asked to witness the will. However, it could also be contended that that was then, and contingency now S does have a compromising vested interest. [This latter paragraph is not necessary. However, it demonstrates the kind of interest and thoughtfulness that may catch a professor's attention and garner an A. Possibly it should be highlighted in some way, perhaps with a red star. I might even decide to put it on the blank page left at the beginning. (See p.75.)]
Conclusion : Y, having predeceased T, will take nothing. The Main Is To! However, Y's intended legacy will go to the son, S, per stirpes . S's having witnessed the will under which he takes should not disqualify him, providing two others of the several witnesses to the will exist to prove it in probate. Actual Civil Procedure I Exam, Fall 2006, U. Memphis School of Law (with Model A+ Response and Professor Comments) [The example that follows is an actual exam and contingency factors model response sent to and the Condition of AIDS, us by contingency, one Richard Townley, Sr., U. Memphis class of 2009E (evening division). Condition! The exam was given jointly to two first year classes by their professors. Richard ordered the audio CD version of LEEWS. Contingency Factors! His is the verbatim model response offered to students with professor comments! as what was wanted.
His response received the highest grade, one of only two A+ grades. His accompanying remarks are reprinted in the Results section. Inter alia (among other things), he said, LEEWS was absolutely essential to wet granulation, my success. . The exemplar is, in fact, *my* exam essay answer, and if I say so myself, it's a pretty good LEEWS exemplar as well. We reiterate that the contingency LEEWS objective for every response is a series of criterion assessment paragraphs, each beginning with relevant law and factors presenting balanced lawyerlike analysis. . What is surely wanted when confronted with a task such as what follows is a system whereby in structured, step-by-step fashion, the examinee knows exactly what is wanted and how to proceed and present. For example, a LEEWS grad will immediately skip over the confusing fact pattern to the question/instruction, typically at the end, and perform Step One. A LEEWS grad has also read many such introductory instructions, and therefore will skim through quickly to note what, if anything, is new and/or unusual. Note that the criterion average student managed less than 17 points out of a possible 45 on the essay exam versus Richard's 39 (!!). . It may be further noted that although these professors did not require a so-called IRAC format [and we commend that!), Richard's paragraphed response could easily have been conformed to a Follow IRAC instruction by merely introducing an issue statement before each paragraph, and a conclusion statement at the end. Factors! LEEWS posits that in general issue statements are unnecessary, as starting a paragraph with law implies the issue, and conclusions are unimportant.] Civil Procedure I -- Exam Results -- Fall, 2006 (§ 11 = Prof Banks, § 12 = Prof Entman) Essays - 45 points.
Average -- § 11 [17.2]; § 12 [16.1]; both sections [16.6] Range -- § 11 [3 - 42]; § 12 [4 - 39] Multiple Choice - 55 points (35 questions) Average -- § 11 [33.70]; § 12 [35.00]; both sections [34.36] Range -- § 11 [18.86 - 50.29]; § 12 [17.29 - 53.43] Total - 100 points. Average -- § 11 [50.90]; § 12 [51.09]; both sections [50.99] Range -- § 11 [22.86 - 92.29]; § 12 [26.29 - 83.00] Average Grade - § 11 [2.33] Both Sections [2.34] § 12 [2.34]
A+: 82 and above. F : 0 - 32. INSTRUCTIONS - Read these instructions carefully. You are responsible for following them to the letter and will be assessed a point penalty or given a failing grade for failure to follow instructions. Before you begin work on this examination, be sure that you have an examination booklet consisting of criterion based assessment 8 consecutively numbered pages -- beginning with this page. Part I consists of problems calling for written analysis. Part II consists of 35 multiple choice questions.
If your examination is incomplete, you should advise the instructor immediately. It is your responsibility to contingency factors, ensure that you are working with a complete examination. The exam is negative of corporal punishment, closed book. You may not use any material other than this examination booklet, the answer sheet, blank paper and an appropriate writing instrument. You may not, of course, confer with or receive assistance from any other person. Your answers for Part I should be written on the paper provided. Be sure to identify clearly which subpart you are answering (e.g., I. Contingency Factors! A.).
When you have completed your answers to Part I, number your pages consecutively, write your identification number on effects punishment, each page, and contingency factors staple all of the criterion assessment pages together in the upper left hand corner. 1. Answer only the question asked and do so with organization, precision, legibility, and proper grammar and spelling. 2. If a court rule or a statute is relevant to contingency, a problem, you may identify it by number, but you must discuss its substance whether or not you mention the based rule or statute by number. 3. Write on only one side of a page and leave a left margin. Write your identification number in the space provided on contingency, the answer sheet for Part II and mark the appropriate corresponding circles on your answer sheet to indicate your examination number. Industrialised Nations! Do not staple the contingency answer sheet for Part II to anything.
Submission of Exams -- General Instructions When you have finished the examination, place your answers to Part I, your answer sheet for Part II, and the exam booklet in the separately designated boxes. All examination booklets must be turned in. Criterion! You must write your identification number on this exam booklet at the top of the first page and contingency return the booklet in order that your exam answer sheet may be matched with the ferrous material correct version of the answers. Do not write your name on anything. For this examination, unless we have specifically studied to factors, the contrary, you should assume the following: 1. all states have adopted rules of civil procedure identical to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure;
2. all states have enacted statutes that authorize the exercise of jurisdiction on each of the traditional bases recognized by the Supreme Court up to the date of negative of corporal its decision in International Shoe; 3. all states have also enacted the following statutes: X.C.A. § 1-1-111: A court may exercise personal jurisdiction over a person (including an individual, his executor, administrator, or other personal representative, or a corporation, partnership, or any other legal or commercial entity) who acts directly or by an agent, as to a claim for relief arising from the contingency persons. (a) transacting any business within this State; (b) causing tortious injury by an act or omission in this State; (c) causing tortious injury in criterion based assessment, this State by an act or omission outside this State if the person regularly does or solicits business, or engages in any other persistent course of conduct, or derives substantial revenue from goods used or consumed or services rendered in this State; (d) owning, using or possessing any property situated in this State; (e) contracting to insure any person, property, or risk located within this State at the time of contracting. X.C.A. § 2-2-222: In any suit brought in contingency, the courts of this State, service of process may be achieved by ferrous material, sending a summons and a copy of the complaint by registered mail, return receipt requested, to the defendant's home address, or principal place of business, wherever located. The problems in Part I are worth a total of 45 points. They are not of equal weight. A. You are now an associate attorney in a law firm. Respond fully to factors, the following memorandum from one of industrialised nations your employers. I Quit is not a recommended answer. To: Associate.
Re: First Commercial Industrial Bank v. Isolde. Date: Dec. 11, 2006. [Fact pattern (hypo)] Tristan and contingency Isolde are partners in a furniture repair business. Their shop is in the State of Essay and the of AIDS Swabia where most of their customers are from. Contingency! Sometimes people from the based nearby States of Prussia and Bavaria bring repair jobs to the shop in Swabia. Isolde was raised in contingency factors, Prussia and lived there with her parents until June, 2003, when she moved into an apartment in Swabia to industrialised nations, see if she would enjoy living away from home. In July, 2003, a vice-president of First Commercial Industrial Bank of Prussia [First Commercial] attended a lecture on furniture repair that Isolde gave in Prussia. He decided that Tristan and contingency Isolde had a promising business and that the wet granulation bank would do well to procure their business. After receiving a letter at their shop offering the banks services, Tristan and factors Isolde decided to borrow $150,000 from First Commercial.
By telephone, they requested the bank send them the and the paperwork at their shop. On August 15, 2003, Tristan and Isolde signed the loan papers at their shop and factors Tristan immediately took them to First Commercials main office, located ten miles away in the State of Prussia. First Commercial then gave them a check for $150,000 minus closing costs of approximately $5,000. The loan agreement provided that its interpretation and validity would be governed by the law of material Prussia and that it was to be repaid in two years. Due to financial difficulties, Tristan and factors Isolde made only two payments on the loan.
When First Commercial threatened to sue them, Tristan settled the effects of corporal punishment banks claim against him for $50,000. First Commercial then sued Isolde in the United States District Court for contingency factors, Prussia to collect the unpaid principal and interest. First Commercials attorney served Isolde with process by registered mail, return receipt requested, to nations, her at the shop in Swabia. On May 15, 2005, after Isolde failed to respond to factors, the complaint and summons, the court entered a default judgment against her for $100,000. Wet Granulation! On December 1, 2006, First Commercial sought to register the judgment against Isolde with the contingency factors United States District Court for negative, the District of Swabia.
In conjunction that proceeding, First Commercial procured a writ of garnishment, attaching $10,000 that Isolde had in a bank account in Swabia. First Commercial also procured a writ of garnishment from the federal court in Bavaria, attaching a $5,000 debt owed to Isolde by one of her customers there. [Question/instruction] We represent Isolde. Please submit a memo to me discussing fully whether Isolde has any defenses she may raise to the enforcement proceedings in Swabia and Bavaria. Be sure to discuss fully any possible defenses that you may have considered and rejected and explain fully why you have rejected them. B. The next day, you receive the following memorandum from the contingency same partner. Again, respond fully. To: Associate. Re: First Commercial Industrial Bank v. Isolde. Date: Dec. 12, 2006.
I have now learned that Isolde was involved in an automobile accident in effects of corporal punishment, Swabia a week after she was served with process by registered mail. Contingency Factors! She was rendered unconscious for two days. An ambulance rushed her to the nearest hospital, which was located in Prussia. Layout Is To! Three days after the accident, but while she was hospitalized in Prussia, a private process server acting on contingency, behalf of First Commercial served Isolde in her hospital bed with a another copy of the summons and complaint for the same lawsuit. Given that she was served while in the state, it now seems to me that the judgment of the federal district court in Prussia against Isolde is unquestionably valid and is enforceable in both Swabia and Bavaria. Industrialised Nations! Please discuss fully whether you believe that assumption is valid and whether the service on Isolde in the hospital establishes jurisdiction. The discussion below is a verbatim copy of a students essay that received a top grade. Commentary by Professors Banks and Entman appears in brackets. Factors! . [LEEWS note: We reprint this commentary in blue.] LEEWS NOTE: IRAC (merely a formula for organizing analysis of an issue) prescribes a statement of ferrous I ssue to precede the contingency statement of R ule, and the discussion ( A nalysis). The Main Objective Layout! (And C onclusion at the end.) The LEEWS paragraphing format posits that an abrupt statement of premise (relevant law) to contingency, begin a paragraph implies the issue, making a separate statement of issue unnecessary (thereby saving time). Richard's model response in LEEWS format does this.
Our only suggestion is that underlining or boldfacing key words in industrialised, the preamble of law e.g., Subject matter jurisdiction in the opening paragraph, federal diversity statute in the next to assist the professor in recognizing the contingency topic (issue). Subject-matter jurisdiction. Objective Layout Is To! The federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction; they can only contingency hear certain types of claims as outlined in Article III of the US Constitution and criterion as authorized by Congressional Statute. Contingency! First Commercial will argue that the US District Court has subject-matter jurisdiction to effects of corporal, hear this case based on the diversity of citizenship of the contingency parties. First Commercial is a citizen of Prussia. Based Assessment! Isolde has been living in Swabia for one month. Contingency Factors! [The facts do not give sufficient information to know how long Isolde had been living in Swabia at the time First Commercial filed its complaint, which is the time at criterion assessment which jurisdiction must either exist or not. At most, one can deduce that the suit was brought as early as November 2003 or as late as April 2005. Consequently, Isolde must have been living in Swabia for more than one month, but not the factors two or three years that some students stated.] She can argue that she is still domiciled in Prussia, where she lived her whole life up to June of 2003, because she only moved to Swabia temporarily, to see if she would enjoy life on her own. If Isolde is found to negative effects, be a domiciliary of Prussia, then there is not diversity of citizenship and thus no subject matter jurisdiction.
However, if Isolde is found to have relocated to Swabia with the intent of staying for the indefinite future, then the parties are diverse. The federal diversity statute also requires the amount in controversy to exceed $75,000. The $100,000 judgment against Isolde satisfies this requirement. N.B. [Please do not use abbreviations, including this one.] This action could not be brought under federal question jurisdiction because breach of contract is a state common-law claim. Contingency Factors! Therefore nothing in the plaintiffs complaint arises under the Constitution and laws of the industrialised nations United States.
Subject-matter jurisdiction is contingency factors, never waived, and in this case, it has not been previously litigated, so it could be raised on collateral attack. However, it is more likely than not that the court will find that Isolde did move to negative effects of corporal punishment, Swabia with the intent to stay indefinitely, so the District Court in Prussia probably did have subject-matter jurisdiction. Personal jurisdiction. Factors! In the alternative, Isolde can argue that the rendering court in Prussia lacked jurisdiction over the person. Ferrous! Because this has not been litigated, it can be raised on collateral attack in the enforcing court. [We would have preferred a discussion at this point that specifically points out that Isolde never even appeared in contingency factors, the first action. Most of negative effects punishment you could have improved your answers by making better use of the facts to support your analysis. The reason Isolde can raise personal jurisdiction on contingency factors, collateral attack is because she did not appear at all in layout, the original action. Since she did not appear, there is no reason to factors, discuss Rule 12.] First, Isolde will argue that there are no traditional bases for criterion based, establishing jurisdiction over her in Prussia.
N.B. The federal courts derive their personal jurisdictional reach from the state in which they are situated, so the District Court can exert personal jurisdiction over an out of state defendant only if the contingency factors state court could do so. Isolde was not served with process with Prussia, so transitory [transient?] jurisdiction does not attach. Because it is criterion based assessment, necessary that she be domiciled in Swabia to establish diversity of factors citizenship, First Commercial cannot argue that she be subjected to criterion, personal jurisdiction on the basis of domicile. Even though the contract included a choice-of-law provision applying the laws of Prussia to contingency factors, possible disputes, that is not the same as a consent provision. [A surprising number of students referred to based, this as a forum selection clause. At least one student referred to it as a forum selection clause in part of the contingency answer and a choice of law provision in another part of the objective is to same answer. Another specifically stated that it was a forum selection clause and not a choice of law provision. Mistakes of this type may be attributable to sloppy reading of the contingency facts but they are also a strong indication of a serious lack of wet granulation preparation. Failure to devote sufficient time to study of the assigned materials frequently manifests itself in a persons demonstrated obliviousness to important distinctions. Others simply didnt know what to do with the factors fact, thus reflecting a failure to study the Burger King opinion and to pay attention to our class discussions of it.] Statutory basis.
First Commercial will argue that the nations long-arm statute conferred specific jurisdiction over Isolde on the basis of the first of the enumerated acts: a) transacting any business within the State. The claim for relief, the $100,000 breach of contract, arises from the defendants act of entering into the loan contract, which First Commercial will argue was executed on Tristans delivery of the loan documents to the Banks main office in Prussia. Isolde will counter that her act was signing the documents, which took place at contingency the furniture shop in ferrous material, Swabia. Contingency! This is a valid argument so long as the court reads the criterion assessment statute literally and contingency narrowly. However, if a court interpreted the statute broadly (See Gray v. American Radiator) it might find that the statute reaches the out of state act, the signing of the contract, which causes an in state result, the execution of the on HIV and the contract. [It is contingency, probably not necessary to stretch the construction of the statute as the court did in Gray to hold that it confers jurisdiction, given the facts of criterion based this problem. The statute covers transacting business in the forum state directly or by an agent. Like McShara in Burger King, Tristan was acting on behalf of the partnership (thus as an agent) in delivering the papers to the bank. The facts specifically state that Isolde, along with Tristan, signed the papers and that he immediately took them to the bank. You should never, as many of contingency you did, overlook the statement that Isolde signed the papers or speculate that she may not have read them. There is simply no basis in the facts for Essay and the of AIDS, speculating that Isolde didnt know what she was signing. Indulging in speculation that she might not have reveals desperation.]
Constitutional Standard. The Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution provides that no state shall deprive a citizen of factors life, liberty or property without due process of law. Objective! The U.S. Supreme Court defined the due process standard as it relates to imposing personal jurisdiction on an out of state defendant in contingency, International Shoe: jurisdiction is negative of corporal, constitutional only if the cause of action arises from the defendants minimum contacts with the forum, such that the assertion of jurisdiction would not offend traditional notions of fair play and contingency substantial justice. Assuming, arguendo, [LEEWS note: We teach the proper use of words like arguendo -- because they are useful and add a lawyerly caste to the presentation.] that the long-arm statute is sufficient to provide a statutory basis of jurisdiction over Isolde, would such jurisdiction be constitutional under the Shoe standard? [While it is implicit in based assessment, the answer that the constitutional hurdle becomes important only if the court first accepts the argument that the statute confers jurisdiction, a perfect answer would have explained that relationship more fully.] Isolde will argue no, because the contact which gives rise to the claim, the signed loan contract, was brought into the forum by the unilateral actions of a third party, Tristan. Therefore, Isolde did not purposefully avail herself of the privileges of factors conducting activities in the forum, Prussia. First Commercial will counter that Tristan and Isolde were operating together to secure the criterion assessment loan. They reached into the forum when they called First Commercial. Isolde knew that Tristan was taking the documents to contingency factors, Prussia, [run-on sentence, a sin committed by many students in these essays] therefore it was imminently [eminently] foreseeable that the contract would be executed there, and she could reasonably anticipate being haled into court in Prussia over any disputes to the contract. (See Denckla, Worldwide VW). While there are some open questions regarding minimum contacts, the facts seem to favor First Commercial.
In the alternative, [In addition?] can Isolde raise any of the fairness factors, defining fair play and substantial justice, articulated in criterion based assessment, the US Supreme Courts Burger King decision? In weighing the relative burden on Isolde compared to the interest of First National in litigating in Prussia, it does not seem unfair to require Isolde to travel to a nearby state where she lived most of her life and where she sometimes appears to give lectures. The interest of the forum state in adjudicating the dispute would be well served because of the contingency factors choice of law provision; Prussia has an interest in adjudicating its own laws. Ferrous Material! The interest of the several states in efficiency and contingency public policy do not seem to Essay on HIV and the, enter the picture, so the fairness factors do not point to Prussia as an unfair forum for contingency factors, Isolde. Conclusion.
Although Isolde has some colorable arguments, she probably cannot invalidate the original judgment on of AIDS, a defense of lack of personal jurisdiction. [Many of you neglected altogether most of the issues about validity of the contingency Prussia judgment treated in the foregoing answer, instead discussing at length personal jurisdiction, subject matter jurisdiction, and service of process in the enforcement proceedings in Swabia and Bavaria. Industrialised! Such discussions reflect a lack of knowledge of our classwork on Assignment 27, a failure to read the factors Shaffer v. Heitner opinion carefully, and a failure to study the problems following that opinion in the casebook.]
Order Essay Paper From #1 Paper Writing Service For Students -
The Effect of Three Contingency Factors on Consumer
Nov 13, 2017 Contingency factors, order essay paper from #1 paper writing service for students -
Zelf je ondernemingsplan schrijven. Wil je je eigen bedrijf beginnen? Of je nu een winkel, restaurant of factors, sportschool wilt beginnen: het is verstandig om een ondernemingsplan te schrijven om je plannen concreet te maken. Material! Wat ga je precies doen? Is er markt voor je product? Waar wil je naar toe? Dit zijn slechts enkele vragen die je beantwoordt in je businessplan. Qredits helpt je hier graag mee op weg. Wij bieden je verschillende tools: een ondernemingsplan template, digitale cursus, schrijven met een coach of contingency factors, klassikaal. Essay On HIV! Bekijk hieronder onze verschillende mogelijkheden. Een gratis template die je helpt om jouw ideeën op een rij te zetten.
Handig voor ondernemers die alleen een structuur nodig hebben. Deze e-learning laat jou nadenken over je onderneming. Je krijgt volop inspiratie en voorbeelden. Contingency! Na afloop download je een kant en klaar plan. € 49,95 incl. And The Condition! btw inclusief financieel plan met inspiratie en voorbeelden eenvoudig online direct beginnen. Laat je je liever begeleiden door iemand?
Een coach helpt je verder, geeft feedback en biedt zekerheid. Contingency Factors! Het resultaat: een perfect plan, klaar om in on HIV and the te leveren bij je kredietverstrekker. 200 excl. Factors! btw inclusief financieel plan advies op maat persoonlijke begeleiding eerlijke feedback 100% focus op jou. Wil jij je ondernemingsplan schrijven in criterion based assessment een klassikale cursus onder begeleiding van experts? Binnen tien weken heb jij je eigen plan. Contingency Factors! Een vaste docent begeleid je. 275 excl. Assessment! btw klassikaal leren begeleiding van experts in contingency 10 avonden een eigen plan inclusief e-learning inclusief werkboek optrekken met ondernemers hulp bij je financiele plan. Wat je wil weten over based assessment een ondernemingsplan. Een ondernemingsplan, ook wel bedrijfsplan of factors, businessplan genoemd, is de eerste stap op weg naar een eigen bedrijf.
Hiermee breng je de haalbaarheid van jouw ideeën in the main of retail is to kaart. Factors! Een ondernemingsplan is criterion assessment, op te delen in de volgende drie hoofdstukken: Graag helpen je op weg om je eigen ondernemingsplan te maken en schrijven met de onderstaande stappen. De ondernemer is contingency, het eerste hoofdstuk van het ondernemingsplan. Nations! Je eigen bedrijf draait namelijk om jou en jouw idee om een bedrijf te starten. Net zoals bij een sollicitatie moet je opschrijven wat je werkervaring is, wat je motivatie is factors, en wat je persoonlijke doelstellingen zijn.
Indien er sprake is industrialised nations, van meerdere ondernemers, zoals bij een V.O.F., vul dan voor elke ondernemer dit hoofdstuk in. De gevraagde gegevens zijn namelijk bedoeld voor alle ondernemers. Contingency! Met onze whitepaper helpen we je welke bedrijfsvorm (rechtsvorm) je zou moeten kiezen. Hier vermeld je je privégegevens, zoals je adres, naam, burgerlijke staat, enzovoort. Criterion Based! Denk er ook aan dat je deze gegevens voor alle ondernemers aanlevert. 1.2.
Persoonlijke motieven en doelstellingen. Hierin beschrijf je waarom je een onderneming wilt beginnen. Vertel iets over jezelf en je achtergrond als een soort persoonlijk CV waarin je benadrukt waarom je zo geschikt bent om een bedrijf op te starten én om dit bedrijf succesvol te laten verlopen. Ook al heb je de beste opleidingen en werkervaring, je zal nog steeds gemotiveerd moeten zijn. Schrijf op wat je motivatie is om met dit bedrijf van start te gaan en welke doelstellingen je jezelf hebt gesteld. Probeer voor jezelf na te gaan waarom dit bedrijf starten zo interessant voor je is. Wat zijn jouw sterke en zwakke punten? Probeer hier vooral eerlijk in contingency factors te zijn. Dit is met name voor jezelf van belang.
Als je weet wat je zwakke punten zijn, kun je daar rekening mee houden. Material! Op welke gebieden heb je coaching en begeleiding nodig? Om (meer) inzicht te krijgen in contingency je sterke en zwakke punten kun je een ondernemerstest invullen. Based Assessment! De uitkomst van de ondernemerstest laat zien hoe je scoort op je ondernemerscompetenties. Voor elke product of dienst is er een markt.
Althans, heb je dat onderzocht? Welk product of dienst ga je tegen welke prijs en op welke locatie aan wie verkopen? Hoe kun je het beste je product of contingency, dienst op de markt zetten, wie zijn jouw klanten en hoe ga ik eraan verdienen? Als je dit lastig vindt kan onze e-learning verkoopplan schrijven je daarbij helpen. Hier zet je alle algemene gegevens van de onderneming op een rijtje. Een duidelijke organisatie is wet granulation, een belangrijke voorwaarde om succesvol te kunnen ondernemen.
Ben je al wel of factors, nog niet ingeschreven bij de Kamer van Koophandel? Heb je de benodigde verzekeringen en Algemene Voorwaarden geregeld? Voor welke rechtsvorm kies je, waar ga je je vestigen en wie doet de administratie? Dit is de kern van je ondernemingsplan. Material! Hier leg je kort maar krachtig uit wat je wilt gaan doen en waarom. Contingency! Probeer jezelf te verkopen. Maak anderen enthousiast.
Hoe heeft de markt zich in het algemeen ontwikkeld en wat is ferrous, de toekomstverwachting? Geldt de uitkomst hiervan ook voor dat deel van de markt waar je je op wil richten? Je markt bestaat uit de verzameling van gegevens over factors bestaande afnemers, potentiële afnemers en alle aanbieders van het product of dienst of of retail, vervangende product of factors, diensten. Wet Granulation! Zijn er weinig aanbieders en geen vervangende product of factors, diensten, dan zit je natuurlijk goed. Nations! Zijn er veel aanbieders en zijn er ook nog eens allerlei vervangende producten of factors, diensten, dan heb je het als starter beslist moeilijk. Industrialised Nations! Voor een starter is contingency, het van belang dat je jouw markt kent. Hier geef je aan hoe de markt zich ontwikkelt, zowel op landelijk niveau als op lokaal niveau. Ferrous Material! Verschuift de behoefte van de potentiële afnemers of contingency, juist niet? Wat gebeurt er met het aantal concurrenten en hoe ontwikkelt de prijs van het product of dienst zich?
Het is effects punishment, belangrijk om uw doelgroep zo nauwkeurig mogelijk te omschrijven. Factors! Wie zijn je (potentiële) klanten? Wat zijn belangrijke kenmerken van deze klanten? Naarmate je jouw klanten beter kent, ben je ook beter in industrialised nations staat ze te bereiken en te bedienen. Je moet weten of contingency, er meer aanbieders zijn van jouw product of objective, dienst. Factors! Denk daarbij ook aan concurrentie die een alternatief aanbieden.
Wat zijn de sterke en zwakke punten van de concurrentie? Weet welke prijs ze vragen en welke kwaliteit ze bieden. Ferrous! Richten ze zich op dezelfde klantengroep? Hoe zorg je ervoor om hiertussen op te vallen? Wat zijn de sterke en zwakke punten van je eigen onderneming en wat zijn de kansen en bedreigingen die zich in de markt voordoen of contingency, gaan voordoen? Met de marketingmix geef je je bedrijf een duidelijk eigen gezicht. De marketingmix maakt je bedrijf herkenbaar voor de buitenwereld.
De marketingmix bestaat uit de vijf P’s: Product of the main of retail layout is to, dienst staat voor meer dan alleen een product of contingency, dienst. Wat is of retail layout is to, de toegevoegde waarde voor de klant? Welk probleem lost het op? Denk ook aan verpakking, garantievoorwaarden, uitstraling en merk.
Wat zijn de belangrijkste kenmerken van je product of contingency, dienst? De prijs zegt iets over criterion based het product of factors, dienst dat je levert, maar ook over ferrous het deel van de markt waar je je op richt. Factors! Met een hoge prijs trek je een andere doelgroep dan met een stuntprijs. The Main! Welke prijsstrategie ga je hanteren? Leg je de nadruk op service of contingency factors, ben je een prijsvechter? Hoe liggen de prijzen bij concurrenten? Hier maakt je duidelijk waar je je bedrijf vestigt. Essay Condition Of AIDS! Ga je huren of kopen?
Start je vanuit huis of kies je voor een bedrijfspand? Beschrijf ook hoe je bedrijfskolom eruit ziet. Contingency! Hoe verloopt de distributie van leverancier tot klant? Waar ga je de producten of diensten verkopen? Wie zijn de leveranciers? Zijn er samenwerkingsverbanden? Promotie maken kan op allerlei manieren en via verschillende kanalen.
Beurzen, nieuwsbrieven of Essay on HIV and the of AIDS, internet zijn mogelijke promotiekanalen. Wanneer ga je wat precies doen? Promotie hoeft zeker niet duur te zijn. Er zijn vele mogelijkheden: advertentie plaatsen, billboards, promotiefoldertjes, mondelinge promotie bij feestjes en verenigingen, mond tot mond reclame, gerichte promotiefolder, telefonisch contact, winkelinrichting, kortingsbonnen, persbericht, eigen website, webadvertising, sponsoring, beurzen (bezoeken of eigen stand), etc. Alles begint met wie je wilt bereiken en wie jou moet begrijpen.
Kun je het werk alleen aan, of factors, het nodig personeel aan te trekken? Personeel aannemen moet zorgvuldig gebeuren. Wet Granulation! Het belang van de uitstraling van het personeel naar buiten toe is van groot belang en wordt regelmatig onderschat. Hoe kom je aan jouw personeel? Heb je behoefte aan hoog- of laaggekwalificeerd? Wordt het personeel zelf opgeleid?
Welke normen en waarden worden er gehanteerd? Een missie is contingency factors, waarvoor we staan, een visie is waarvoor we gaan. Layout! De missie heeft te maken met waarden en identiteit. Contingency Factors! Een visie geeft aan: hoe gaan wij de wereld van morgen beïnvloeden zodat wij succes hebben? Het is noodzakelijk om kort en bondig je missie en je visie te kunnen beschrijven. Of Corporal! Grote lappen tekst met onderbouwing kunnen in factors het plan zelf terug komen. Wet Granulation! Wel moeten ze duidelijk zijn. Contingency! Dat kun je vrij gemakkelijk doen via de SMART theorie. Ferrous! SMART staat voor: Specifiek, Meetbaar, Attractief, Realistisch en Tijdgebonden.
Als aan deze voorwaarden wordt voldaan kan via het ondernemingsplan zelf nagegaan worden of deze missie en doelstellingen uiteindelijk met alle aanwezige achtergrond informatie werkelijk mogelijk zijn. Wie zijn we, wat zijn onze waarden, hoe willen we met onze klanten en medewerkers omgaan? Probeer ook zo reëel mogelijk in factors te schatten hoe groot de omzet is objective layout is to, die je verwacht te gaan halen. Waar wil je over contingency factors 5 tot 10 jaar staan met je onderneming? Wat ga je doen om te zorgen dat je succes hebt en houdt? Het financieel plan is in the main objective layout is to feite het vertalen van de aannames uit het ondernemingsplan naar financiën/geld. Contingency Factors! Je kunt onze gratis template financieel plan daarvoor gebruiken.
Het financiële hoofdstuk bestaat uit de volgende onderdelen: Waar komt mijn kapitaal vandaan en waar is het geïnvesteerd? Ben ik - winstgevend? Kan ik op tijd voldoen aan mijn financiële verplichtingen? Een bedrijf starten kost geld. Sommige investeringen zijn noodzakelijk om te kunnen starten, andere kunnen misschien beter nog even wachten.
In de investeringsbegroting zet je op een rij wat je minimaal nodig hebt om te kunnen starten. De investeringsbegroting is onderverdeeld in industrialised vaste activa en vlottende activa. Contingency Factors! Vaste activa, zoals een computer, machines, inventaris, en een bedrijfsauto, zijn bedrijfsmiddelen die langer dan een jaar in of retail je bedrijf aanwezig zijn. Contingency! Deze middelen maken het mogelijk dat je de activiteiten kunt uitvoeren. Zij ondersteunen het bedrijfsproces. Bedrijfsmiddelen die korter dan een jaar in material je bedrijf aanwezig zijn, zoals voorraden, vorderingen, voorfinanciering BTW en debiteuren, zijn vlottende activa. Contingency Factors! Deze middelen zijn onderdeel van je bedrijfsproces. Aanloop- en openingskosten zijn kosten die je maakt voordat je kunt starten en/of omzet kunt maken.
Voorbeelden: notariskosten, inschrijving Kamer van Koophandel, levensonderhoud eerste periode, marktonderzoek, advieskosten, visitekaartjes en briefpapier. Onderbouw de bedragen met offertes. The Main! Vraag offertes op bij meerdere leveranciers om zo tot een juiste keuze te komen. Houd rekening met onvoorziene kosten. In uw financieringsbegroting staat hoe je de benodigde investeringen gaat financieren. Contingency! Dit kan door middel van eigen vermogen of met vreemd vermogen. Het deel van de investeringen dat je zelf financiert heet eigen vermogen. Layout! Dit kan in contingency factors vorm van geld zijn dat je hebt gespaard of bedrijfsmiddelen (auto, voorraad, computer) die je eerder hebt aangeschaft. Assessment! Het kan ook zijn dat een familielid of kennis je geld wil lenen. Er is factors, een regeling die het voor particulieren, zoals familie of wet granulation, kennissen, fiscaal aantrekkelijk maakt geld aan startende ondernemers te lenen.
Deze regeling biedt zo'n particuliere geldgever namelijk interessante fiscale voordelen. Factors! Zogenaamde `achtergestelde´ leningen of objective, durfkapitaal wordt door een kredietverstrekker vaak gezien als eigen vermogen. Contingency Factors! Andere voorbeelden van partijen die kunnen financieren en hun bedrag achter zouden willen stellen, zijn de huurbaas, of Essay Condition, de vorige eigenaar van de zaak die je hebt overgenomen. Vreemd vermogen is contingency factors, geld dat zakelijke financiers (bijvoorbeeld banken en leveranciers) je willen lenen. Wet Granulation! Er is onderscheid tussen schulden met een looptijd van langer dan een jaar en korter dan een jaar. In feite zijn de langlopende leningen bedoeld om de vaste activa te financieren. Hypothecaire leningen hebben als doel een bedrijfspand te financieren, met een (middellange) banklening (of lease) kun je een machine of contingency factors, inventaris aanschaffen. Dat betekent automatisch dat de vlottende activa met kort vreemd vermogen moet worden gefinancierd. Dit zijn voornamelijk het rekening-courantkrediet (of werkkapitaal) en crediteuren (leverancierskrediet).
In feite kan zelfs de belastingdienst je financieren, maar daar kun je beter maar niet te veel op leunen. Een balans is assessment, een overzicht van de bezittingen, de schulden en het eigen vermogen van je onderneming op een bepaald moment. Anders gezegd: op een balans staat wat je hebt (activa, de linkerzijde van de balans), in de vorm van geld, goederen, enz., en hoe die gefinancierd zijn (passiva, de rechterzijde van de balans): met eigen vermogen of met vreemd vermogen (leningen). Contingency Factors! Dus een balans is objective of retail layout is to, een momentopname van bezittingen en van de manier waarop deze zijn betaald. De solvabiliteit is factors, de verhouding van uw eigen vermogen ten opzichte van het totaal benodigde vermogen. Wet Granulation! Dit geeft aan in hoeverre uw onderneming de schulden op lange termijn kan voldoen. In je verkoopprognose moet je de omzet op een juiste en reële manier inschatten. Contingency! Het maken van een verkoopprognose is based, niet eenvoudig, maar wel noodzakelijk.
Daarmee kun je namelijk inschatten wat je gaat verdienen en of contingency factors, dat voldoende is om alle verplichtingen te kunnen voldoen. Negative Effects Punishment! Uiteindelijk bepaalt de omzet, minus de inkoopkosten en overige kosten je winst of factors, verlies. De berekening is simpel. Industrialised! Het aantal verkochte producten per maand wordt vermenigvuldigd met de prijs die voor het product vraagt. Contingency Factors! Als dienstverlener kun je het aantal uren invullen, wanneer je een vergoeding op uurbasis vraagt. De omzet moet je exclusief BTW opgeven. The Main Layout Is To! Je moet wel aangeven welk BTW tarief op jouw product of dienst van toepassing is. Contingency! (21%, 6% of wet granulation, 0%). De belastingdienst geeft hier meer informatie over. Omzet wordt gemaakt op het moment dat de factuur naar de klant/opdrachtgever wordt gestuurd. Factors! Dat wil in material de meeste gevallen niet zeggen dat het geld direct wordt bijgeschreven op je rekening. Factors! Betalen je klanten direct (contact of the main layout, PIN) zoals in contingency factors de detailhandel, of moet je weken op je geld wachten.
Deze periode noemen we de debiteurentermijn. Onderaan de verkoopprognose moet je invullen wanneer welk deel van je klanten gaat betalen. Zorg ervoor dat je prognose kan worden onderbouwd met cijfers uit de branchegegevens, je concurrentieanalyse en marketingmix. Houd rekening met seizoensinvloeden. Ga je direct in nations je eerste maand omzet maken, of is contingency factors, er sprake van een aanloopperiode?
Is het geplande aantal uren daadwerkelijk declarabel? Houd rekening met bijvoorbeeld reistijd, acquisitie, ziekte, administratie. Based Assessment! Is deze omzet haalbaar (reëel), gezien vanuit de geplande investeringen en personeelscapaciteit? Om geld te kunnen verdienen aan producten die je verkoopt, moet je die producten eerst zelf inkopen. Het verschil tussen wat je verkoopt en de prijs die je zelf hebt betaald om die producten in te kopen is contingency, je brutowinst. Er bestaat dus een direct verband tussen inkoop en verkoop. The Main Layout Is To! De inkoopprijs van alle verkochte artikelen hoort tot de inkoopwaarde van de omzet.
De formule om de inkoopwaarde van de omzet te bepalen is contingency factors, als volgt: Beginvoorraad + Jaarinkopen Eindvoorraad. Alle producten die je al wel hebt ingekocht, maar nog niet hebt verkocht, heb je op voorraad en worden daarom niet tot de inkoopwaarde van de omzet gerekend. Bedrijven die niet handelen in producten, maar hun kennis en tijd ‘verkopen’ aan de klant, hebben te maken met diensten. Essay Condition! Diensten hebben meestal geen inkoopprijs (of slechts zeer gering). Contingency Factors! Bij diensten kun je stellen dat de brutowinst (bijna) gelijk is of corporal punishment, aan de behaalde omzet. Er zijn meerdere factoren die de inkoopwaarde van de omzet kunnen bepalen. Denk bijvoorbeeld aan het inhuren van andere bedrijven (‘diensten van derden’). Deze worden meestal ook rechtstreeks van de behaalde omzet afgehaald. Factors! Andere voorbeelden zijn provisies die je betaald aan tussenpersonen of the main objective of retail, agenten, het huren van materiaal die je nodig hebt om een dienst te kunnen verlenen. Contingency! Dit zijn zogenaamde directe kosten. Based! Heeft een bedrijf te maken met een werkplaats, dan worden veel van de bewerkkosten of contingency, ‘maak’ kosten ook rechtstreeks verrekend met de behaalde omzet.
Eigenlijk alles met een rechtstreeks verband met de behaalde omzet! Om de inkoopprognose correct in te vullen, moet je invullen wanneer je daadwerkelijk voorraad moet gaan inkopen. Criterion Based Assessment! Afhankelijk van het product, de branche en de vraag zal de frequentie verschillen. Contingency Factors! Is het nodig dat je elke dag inkoopt (bijv. Industrialised Nations! verse levensmiddelen), of factors, kun slechts één keer per criterion kwartaal je inkopen doen (bijv. Factors! kleding)? Kun je inschatten hoe lang je product gemiddeld op voorraad ligt? En welke deel van je voorraad is niet meer te verkopen na verloop van tijd (incourante voorraad)? In je exploitatiebegroting schat je in on HIV of je bedrijf rendabel is. Contingency Factors! Door de omzet en kosten in een overzicht te plaatsen, kun je in een oogopslag zien of Condition, je bedrijf winst of verlies maakt.
In de exploitatiebegroting staan de bedragen exclusief BTW vermeld. Uitgangspunt voor de exploitatiebegroting is contingency factors, de verkoopprognose (zie 3.3). Door de inkoopwaarde van de omzet af te trekken wordt de brutowinst zichtbaar. Industrialised Nations! De inkoopwaarde van de omzet wordt berekend aan de hand van de ingevulde inkoopprognose (zie 3.4). Door de brutowinst te verminderen met alle wederkerend bedrijfskosten, zoals huisvestings-, vervoers-, promotie- en personeelskosten, houd jij je netto bedrijfsresultaat over.
Dit bepaalt of contingency factors, je bedrijfsactiviteit op zichzelf rendabel is. Onder de bedrijfskosten vallen ook de afschrijvingen. Negative Effects! Afschrijvingen zijn wel kosten, maar geen uitgaven. Contingency! Afschrijvingen geven de je gelegenheid reserves op te bouwen om te kunnen (her)investeringen in wet granulation de vaste activa van je bedrijf. Contingency Factors! Je geeft het geld pas uit op het moment dat je moet gaan investeren. Je geeft je ook extra ruimte om je aflosverplichting te voldoen.
Voordat jij je winst uit onderneming kan bepalen, moet je opgeven hoeveel vergoeding je aan de financiers, die je bedrijfsactiviteit mede mogelijk hebben gemaakt , jaarlijks moet betalen. Based Assessment! Dit wordt ook wel rente genoemd. Als je winst hebt gemaakt, moet je daarover belasting betalen. Factors! Hoeveel dat is, hangt af van het winstbedrag en aftrekposten die je als zelfstandige mag opvoeren. Wet Granulation! Voor deze aftrekposten gelden wel diverse voorwaarden. Contingency Factors! Kijk daarom goed op de site van de belastingdienst. De nettowinst is de basis voor uw inkomen uit een eenmanszaak of nations, VOF. In een BV staat de ondernemer als bestuurder/directeur van de BV op de loonlijst en ontvangt een salaris. Het salaris is contingency, een kostenpost voor de BV.
De omzet moet hoog genoeg zijn om ook het salaris van de directeur te betalen. Based Assessment! We bieden je gratis een eenvoudige template voor exploitatiebegroting. Aannames moeten gebaseerd zijn op goed doordachte veronderstellingen Omzet op basis van marktonderzoek en niet op alleen basis van aantal x prijs Check de samenhang met het Marketingplan Omzet moet met gewenst personeelsbestand en kapitaal vervaardigd kunnen worden. Kun je elke maand alle rekeningen betalen? Door het maken van een liquiditeitsbegroting bepaal je of factors, er iedere maand voldoende geld op je rekening staat. Inkomsten en uitgaven kunnen gedurende een jaar sterk wisselen. On HIV! Bijvoorbeeld door seizoensinvloeden, een vakantieperiode, belastingaanslag of door klanten die laat betalen. Contingency Factors! Met een liquiditeitsbegroting maak je inzichtelijk op welk moment extra financiën nodig zijn. Vrijwel alle bedrijfskosten die zijn opgenomen in of retail layout is to de exploitatiebegroting komen ook terug in contingency de liquiditeitsbegroting. The Main Objective Is To! Afschrijvingen vormen hierop de belangrijkste uitzondering.
De liquiditeitsbegroting toont hoe de kosten over contingency factors het jaar worden verdeeld en aan in effects of corporal punishment welke maand de kosten daadwerkelijk betaald moeten worden. Contingency Factors! Zeker in een groeiende ondernemingen zullen met de omzet ook de kosten maandelijks variëren (en toenemen). Naast de bedrijfskosten, worden ook de (maandelijkse) privéopnamen, inclusief inkomstenbelasting, en aflossingen staan niet in wet granulation de liquiditeitsbegroting opgenomen. Factors! Via onze site kun je nu eenvoudig een sjabloon liquiditeitsbegroting downloaden. Op de exploitatiebegroting zijn alle bedragen exclusief BTW. In de liquiditeitsbegroting reken je de BTW ontvangsten en uitgaven mee. Uit de exploitatiebegroting kun je opmaken of nations, je voldoende omzet genereert om de bedrijfs- en financieringskosten te dekken. Factors! De cashflow berekent vervolgens of jij je privéopnamen wel uit de onderneming kan halen en of material, er daarnaast genoeg overblijft om leningen af te lossen, herinvesteringen te voldoen of reserves op te bouwen.
Grofweg is contingency factors, de cashflow gelijk aan de nettowinst plus afschrijvingen van een onderneming. De cashflow is positief als er jaarlijks meer geld binnenkomt dan dat er uit gaat. On HIV Of AIDS! De cashflow is negatief als er per jaar meer geld wordt uitgegeven dan er binnenkomt. Een positieve cashflow wil niet direct zeggen dat je onderneming liquide is, dat er het hele jaar door voldoende geld op je rekening staat. Contingency! Dat moet blijken uit de liquiditeitsbegroting. Voordat je met je bedrijf begint, moet je weten hoeveel je maandelijks nodig om privé van rond te komen. Breng al je (huishoud)verplichtingen in kaart. Vermeld ook alle inkomsten die je huishouding ontvangt, zoals het loon (inclusief vakantie geld en dertiende maand) van jezelf en/of je partner, uitkeringen, pensioenen en eventueel kinderbijslag. Het verschil tussen de privéverplichtingen en -inkomsten bepaalt het bedrag dat je maandelijks uit je onderneming moet halen om van te leven.
Houd je zakelijke betalingsverkeer gescheiden van je privé-inkomsten en -uitgaven door het openen van een aparte rekeningen. Een afschrijving is effects punishment, het in factors de boekhouding tot uitdrukking brengen van de waardedaling van een bedrijfsmiddel over een bepaalde periode. Doordat je machines gebruikt zullen ze slijten. Negative! Ook zal de waarde van je gebouw of contingency, vrachtwagens in Essay and the of AIDS de loop van de jaren afnemen. De waardevermindering van deze kapitaalgoederen wordt ook wel afschrijving of factors, afschrijvingskosten genoemd. Er wordt steeds afschrijving toegepast om de slijtage door het gebruik tot uitdrukking te brengen. Of Retail Layout Is To! Deze afschrijving vormt een kostenpost in de Winst- en Verliesrekening en leidt dus tot een lager resultaat.
Bekijk de mogelijkheden van Qredits. Ondernemingsplan template downloaden. Als je een onderneming wilt beginnen, is contingency factors, het verstandig eerst een ondernemingsplan te maken. Qredits wil je hier graag mee op weg helpen. E-learning Ondernemingsplan Schrijven. Deze e-learning laat jou nadenken over wet granulation je onderneming. Je krijgt volop inspiratie en voorbeelden. Contingency! Na afloop download je een kant en klaar plan. Vind je het moeilijk om je eigen ondernemingsplan op te stellen? Twijfel je of het goed is? Een coach helpt je bij het structureren van je ideeen.
Qredits helpt ondernemers bij het succesvol starten van en investeren in hun bedrijf. Based Assessment! We bieden coaching, kennis in contingency factors de Qredits Academy voor ondernemers en we verstrekken bedrijfskredieten tot 250.000. Qredits verstrekt de microkredieten mede dankzij twee programmas van de Europese Unie: het EaSI, een Europees programma voor werkgelegenheid en sociale innovatie, en COSME, een programma dat de concurrentiepositie van midden- en kleinbedrijf verbetert. Lees meer.
Order Essays Online Cheap -
Factors That Influence Contingency Planning |
Nov 13, 2017 Contingency factors, order custom essay online -
10 Things You Need to Know About Essay Castle Coursework Writing Service. For all those that are struggling with an unbearable amount of coursework, weve got good news you are not alone! Gone are the times when you had to factors deal with all kinds of criterion assessment courseworks on your own. We are here to contingency factors help you, and industrialised nations our help is all you need to be able to manage college and other things you have in contingency life. What can we do for the main of retail, you? In simple words, we will do your coursework, no matter what it implies, without you having to contingency lift a finger. EssayCastle.co.uk has a vast number of writers at its disposal and their quills (or, more specifically, writing skills and time) are free for hire. We dont expect you to criterion plunge head first, however, and would like to tell you ten things you need to know about our service before you make your very first order. What you need to factors know about our coursework help. We are neither a resell service nor an online library.
Papers written her, whatever the wet granulation, type, are created entirely from scratch. Once a paper has been submitted to the client, it is then deleted from the data base to prevent re-using. When you order coursework writing from contingency factors our specialists, you are free to provide as many instructions as you deem necessary. The ability to customize your order is one of the biggest benefits you will get at our service. Nations. Do you need an essay? A research paper?
A PhD thesis? No problem! Our service has been designed with all our customers needs in mind, so you will address our writing team with all kinds of requests. Urgency is contingency, often a major factor to choose an appropriate writing company. We are glad to tell you that ours starts at only 3 hours. Objective Layout. And even if your order is VERY urgent, it will be fulfilled and delivered right when you requested it to be fulfilled and delivered. While your order is being fulfilled, you have to options: to participate in fulfilment and keep tabs on paper development OR stay away from it entirely.
What you need to know about our UK coursework company. Once you become a customer of this service, you will enjoy special discounts dedicated to holidays and other occasions. By using them, you can achieve significant savings and contingency factors get the same high-quality papers. We have a few hundred of writers the majority of whom are based in the UK and assessment have degrees from major UK universities. The minimum required threshold is a masters degree. With a wide span of factors subjects available, you can order English coursework or any other type of coursework you might possibly need. The Main Objective Of Retail Layout Is To. We currently cover over fifty subject areas and are adding more to cope with changing curricula. Its not the factors, end of the world if you dont like the paper you have received from us, and there is no need to nations try and improve it on your own. For situations like this, we have introduced a free-revision policy.
After your paper has been written, you can request multiple free revisions. The number of revisions is not limited; however, we do limit the time to 14 days. Last but not least, papers provided to our customers are ALWAYS original. Even though a medium originality level is universally accepted by writing services, we have a much higher standard and shoot for 100% originality. A plagiarism report is available for those who want to factors be sure about the quality of their papers. Buy coursework without financial difficulties!
A student has to think ahead in terms of finances, and custom writing can become one of the negative, major articles of expenditure. Yet what is the point of having a job if you will pay everything you earn for custom papers? To avoid such unfeasible distribution of funds, we have introduced a flexible pricing policy that includes discounts, guarantees, and price leverage factors. Every customer that wants to request our help can adjust the price to fit his or her particular needs. Contingency. This is material, done with the help of the following: Adjusting urgency. Contingency. Extending your deadline will let you save on of corporal urgency charges.
Switching off extra convenience services like sms updates and high priority (Although if you order a very important assignment, we dont recommend using this option). Contingency Factors. Lowering the of corporal, quality standard of your paper to get budget instead of premium charge. Changing the contingency factors, difficulty level. We service customers of industrialised nations all levels starting at secondary school. If you need a school-level assignment, there is contingency factors, no need to ask for university-level quality. In addition, we will be happy to offer you discounts! Currently, there are the following discounts available: First order price-off for new customers.
Referral program. Essay And The. Bring friends, get credits for factors, your account when they order, and use these credits for your next order as easy as that! We also have sales from time to time, so dont forget to check your email! And dont forget we never apply hidden charges after the initial order cost has been paid. Its important for a vast majority of our clients that their information should never be disclosed to criterion assessment third parties. To ensure privacy and security, we take measures in two directions.
First, your personal information is encrypted and protected with industry-grade methods. Secondly, our company works with only reliable payment providers, which is contingency factors, our primary means to prevent financial fraud and malpractice. By default, we never disclose the names of nations clients that have used our help. We hope that now you have enough information to decide if our service is suitable to your needs. To request our help without any more delays, please do the following: Complete our ordering form, having filled all the required fields Submit payment details to perform the transactions and have a writer assigned Wait as long as you have specified (the Deadline field) for your paper to be delivered. Contingency Factors. Check on the progress using the Personal Area of necessary.
Your writing problems will become ours in a matter of minutes. Order now to start benefitting.
Buy Essay Online -
What is Contingency Factors | IGI Global
Nov 13, 2017 Contingency factors, write my essay, paper -
Duke, Diversity, Orwellian Language. Elaine Heath, author of, among other theological works, The Gospel According To Twilight: Women, Sex, and contingency, God , and dean of the Duke Divinity School, today released the following statement to the DDS community: Friends, as you may or may not be aware, a confidential personnel matter has been made public on various social media. Ferrous Material. For privacy reasons we are not able to comment on contingency, personnel matters but can provide the following statement: Duke Divinity School is committed to scholarly excellence and academic freedom, which includes a commitment to diversity and inclusion. We seek to objective of retail layout foster an environment where diversity of opinions is respected and members of the factors community feel free to engage in a robust exchange of ideas on a range of issues and topics. We believe that all faculty have a right to speak out as members of a civil academic community, and if all voices are to be heard, diverse perspectives must be valued and protected. As part of an ongoing effort to foster and support such a community, we will continue to offer voluntary opportunities for faculty, staff and students to participate in diversity training.
Some diverse voices are more diverse than others, as Prof. Griffiths has learned to his dismay (click here to see the Essay Condition documents detailing this crisis). Which brings us to these passages from contingency factors George Orwells essay Politics and objective, the English Language: MEANINGLESS WORDS. In certain kinds of writing, particularly in art criticism and literary criticism, it is normal to contingency come across long passages which are almost completely lacking in meaning(2). Words like romantic, plastic, values, human, dead, sentimental, natural, vitality, Elaine Heath/Duke Divinity School. as used in art criticism, are strictly meaningless, in the sense that they not only Essay and the Condition do not point to any discoverable object, but are hardly ever expected to do so by the reader. Contingency Factors. When one critic writes, The outstanding feature of Mr.
Xs work is its living quality, while another writes, The immediately striking thing about Mr. Xs work is its peculiar deadness, the of corporal reader accepts this as a simple difference opinion. If words like black and white were involved, instead of the jargon words dead and contingency, living, he would see at once that language was being used in an improper way. Many political words are similarly abused. Industrialised Nations. The word Fascism has now no meaning except in so far as it signifies something not desirable. The words democracy, socialism, freedom, patriotic, realistic, justice have each of them several different meanings which cannot be reconciled with one another. In the case of a word like democracy, not only is there no agreed definition, but the attempt to factors make one is of corporal resisted from all sides.
It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it: consequently the defenders of factors every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using that word if it were tied down to any one meaning. Words of this kind are often used in wet granulation a consciously dishonest way. That is, the person who uses them has his own private definition, but allows his hearer to contingency think he means something quite different. Statements like Marshal Petain was a true patriot, The Soviet press is the freest in the world, The Catholic Church is opposed to objective persecution, are almost always made with intent to deceive. Contingency Factors. Other words used in variable meanings, in most cases more or less dishonestly, are: class, totalitarian, science, progressive, reactionary, bourgeois, equality. Diversity! Dont forget diversity. It is almost always a code word in academia for left-wing uniformity of thought. In our time it is broadly true that political writing is bad writing. Where it is not true, it will generally be found that the writer is some kind of rebel, expressing his private opinions and not a party line.
Orthodoxy, of whatever colour, seems to demand a lifeless, imitative style. Wet Granulation. The political dialects to be found in contingency pamphlets, leading articles, manifestos, White papers and the speeches of undersecretaries do, of course, vary from party to party, but they are all alike in that one almost never finds in them a fresh, vivid, homemade turn of speech. Negative Effects Of Corporal. When one watches some tired hack on the platform mechanically repeating the contingency familiar phrases bestial, atrocities, iron heel, bloodstained tyranny, free peoples of the world, stand shoulder to shoulder one often has a curious feeling that one is not watching a live human being but some kind of dummy: a feeling which suddenly becomes stronger at assessment, moments when the light catches the speakers spectacles and turns them into blank discs which seem to contingency factors have no eyes behind them. And this is industrialised nations not altogether fanciful. Factors. A speaker who uses that kind of phraseology has gone some distance toward turning himself into a machine. The appropriate noises are coming out of his larynx, but his brain is on HIV and the not involved, as it would be if he were choosing his words for himself. If the speech he is making is one that he is accustomed to make over and over again, he may be almost unconscious of what he is saying, as one is when one utters the responses in church. And this reduced state of consciousness, if not indispensable, is at any rate favourable to contingency factors political conformity. In our time, political speech and writing are largely the defence of the indefensible.
Never more true than in contemporary academic politics, right? I believe this is Paul Griffithss Havels Greengrocer moment. Ferrous. From Vaclav Havels 1978 essay The Power Of The Powerless: The manager of a fruit-and-vegetable shop places in his window, among the onions and carrots, the slogan: Workers of the world, unite! Why does he do it? What is he trying to communicate to the world? Is he genuinely enthusiastic about the idea of unity among the workers of the world? Is his enthusiasm so great that he feels an irrepressible impulse to acquaint the public with his ideals? Has he really given more than a moments thought to how such a unification might occur and what it would mean? I think it can safely be assumed that the overwhelming majority of shopkeepers never think about the slogans they put in their windows, nor do they use them to express their real opinions. That poster was delivered to our greengrocer from the enterprise headquarters along with the onions and carrots.
He put them all into the window simply because it has been done that way for factors, years, because everyone does it, and because that is the way it has to be. If he were to refuse, there could be trouble. He could be reproached for not having the proper decoration in his window; someone might even accuse him of disloyalty. Ferrous Material. He does it because these things must be done if one is to get along in life. It is one of the thousands of details that guarantee him a relatively tranquil life in harmony with society, as they say.
Obviously the greengrocer is indifferent to contingency the semantic content of the objective of retail layout is to slogan on exhibit; he does not put the slogan in factors his window from any personal desire to on HIV Condition of AIDS acquaint the contingency factors public with the ideal it expresses. This, of course, does not mean that his action has no motive or significance at wet granulation, all, or that the slogan communicates nothing to anyone. The slogan is contingency factors really a sign, and as such it contains a subliminal but very definite message. Wet Granulation. Verbally, it might be expressed this way: I, the greengrocer XY, live here and contingency factors, I know what I must do. I behave in ferrous the manner expected of me. I can be depended upon contingency factors, and am beyond reproach. I am obedient and therefore I have the right to be left in peace. This message, of course, has an addressee: it is directed above, to the greengrocers superior, and at the same time it is a shield that protects the greengrocer from potential informers. Of Retail Layout. The slogans real meaning, therefore, is rooted firmly in the greengrocers existence. It reflects his vital interests. But what are those vital interests?
Let us take note: if the greengrocer had been instructed to display the slogan I am afraid and therefore unquestioningly obedient, he would not be nearly as indifferent to its semantics, even though the statement would reflect the truth. The greengrocer would be embarrassed and ashamed to contingency put such an unequivocal statement of his own degradation in the shop window, and quite naturally so, for he is a human being and thus has a sense of his own dignity. To overcome this complication, his expression of layout is to loyalty must take the form of a sign which, at least on its textual surface, indicates a level of disinterested conviction. It must allow the greengrocer to say, Whats wrong with the workers of the world uniting? Thus the sign helps the greengrocer to conceal from himself the low foundations of his obedience, at contingency, the same time concealing the low foundations of power. It hides them behind the facade of something high. Industrialised Nations. And that something is factors ideology. Ideology is a specious way of relating to objective layout the world.
It offers human beings the illusion of an identity, of dignity, and of morality while making it easier for them to part with them. As the repository of something suprapersonal and contingency factors, objective, it enables people to of retail deceive their conscience and conceal their true position and their inglorious modus vivendi , both from the world and from themselves. It is contingency a very pragmatic but, at the same time, an apparently dignified way of legitimizing what is is to above, below, and on either side. It is directed toward people and toward God. It is a veil behind which human beings can hide their own fallen existence, their trivialization, and their adaptation to the status quo. It is an excuse that everyone can use, from the greengrocer, who conceals his fear of losing his job behind an alleged interest in the unification of the workers of the contingency factors world, to wet granulation the highest functionary, whose interest in staying in power can be cloaked in phrases about factors, service to the working class. The primary excusatory function of ideology, therefore, is to provide people, both as victims and pillars of the post-totalitarian system, with the illusion that the assessment system is in harmony with the human order and the order of the universe. We have seen that the real meaning of the greengrocers slogan has nothing to contingency factors do with what the text of the slogan actually says. Even so, this real meaning is quite clear and wet granulation, generally comprehensible because the code is so familiar: the greengrocer declares his loyalty (and he can do no other if his declaration is to be accepted) in the only way the regime is capable of hearing; that is, by accepting the prescribed ritual, by accepting appearances as reality, by contingency factors, accepting the given rules of the game. Ferrous. In doing so, however, he has himself become a player in the game, thus making it possible for the game to go on, for it to exist in the first place.
If ideology was originally a bridge between the system and the individual as an individual, then the contingency factors moment he steps on to this bridge it becomes at the same time a bridge between the the main objective system and the individual as a component of the system. Contingency. That is, if ideology originally facilitated (by acting outwardly) the constitution of nations power by serving as a psychological excuse, then from the moment that excuse is accepted, it constitutes power inwardly, becoming an active component of contingency that power. It begins to material function as the principal instrument of ritual communication within the system of power. The whole power structure (and we have already discussed its physical articulation) could not exist at all if there were not a certain metaphysical order binding all its components together, interconnecting them and subordinating them to a uniform method of factors accountability, supplying the combined operation of all these components with rules of the wet granulation game, that is, with certain regulations, limitations, and legalities. This metaphysical order is fundamental to, and contingency, standard throughout, the entire power structure; it integrates its communication system and makes possible the internal exchange and transfer of information and nations, instructions. Contingency Factors. It is rather like a collection of traffic signals and directional signs, giving the process shape and structure.
This metaphysical order guarantees the inner coherence of the totalitarian power structure. It is the glue holding it together, its binding principle, the the main objective layout instrument of its discipline. Without this glue the structure as a totalitarian structure would vanish; it would disintegrate into individual atoms chaotically colliding with one another in contingency their unregulated particular interests and inclinations. The entire pyramid of totalitarian power, deprived of the element that binds it together, would collapse in upon itself, as it were, in a kind of is to material implosion. As the interpretation of reality by the power structure, ideology is always subordinated ultimately to contingency the interests of the structure. Therefore, it has a natural tendency to disengage itself from reality, to create a world of Essay on HIV and the Condition appearances, to contingency become ritual. In societies where there is public competition for power and therefore public control of that power, there also exists quite naturally public control of the wet granulation way that power legitimates itself ideologically.
Consequently, in such conditions there are always certain correctives that effectively prevent ideology from abandoning reality altogether. Under totalitarianism, however, these correctives disappear, and thus there is contingency nothing to prevent ideology from becoming more and more removed from reality, gradually turning into what it has already become in the post-totalitarian system: a world of based assessment appearances, a mere ritual, a formalized language deprived of semantic contact with reality and transformed into a system of factors ritual signs that replace reality with pseudo-reality. Yet, as we have seen, ideology becomes at ferrous, the same time an increasingly important component of power, a pillar providing it with both excusatory legitimacy and an inner coherence. As this aspect grows in importance, and as it gradually loses touch with reality, it acquires a peculiar but very real strength. It becomes reality itself, albeit a reality altogether self-contained, one that on certain levels (chiefly inside the power structure) may have even greater weight than reality as such.
Increasingly, the virtuosity of the ritual becomes more important than the reality hidden behind it. The significance of contingency phenomena no longer derives from the phenomena themselves, but from wet granulation their locus as concepts in the ideological context. Reality does not shape theory, but rather the reverse. Thus power gradually draws closer to ideology than it does to reality; it draws its strength from theory and becomes entirely dependent on contingency factors, it. This inevitably leads, of course, to a paradoxical result: rather than theory, or rather ideology, serving power, power begins to serve ideology. It is as though ideology had appropriated power from power, as though it had become dictator itself.
It then appears that theory itself, ritual itself, ideology itself, makes decisions that affect people, and not the other way around. If ideology is the principal guarantee of the industrialised nations inner consistency of power, it becomes at the same time an increasingly important guarantee of its continuity. Whereas succession to power in classical dictatorship is contingency always a rather complicated affair (the pretenders having nothing to give their claims reasonable legitimacy, thereby forcing them always to resort to nations confrontations of naked power), in factors the post-totalitarian system power is passed on from person to person, from industrialised nations clique to clique, and from generation to generation in an essentially more regular fashion. Contingency Factors. In the selection of material pretenders, a new king-maker takes part: it is ritual legitimation, the ability to rely on ritual, to fulfill it and use it, to allow oneself, as it were, to be borne aloft by it. Naturally, power struggles exist in the post-totalitarian system as well, and most of them are far more brutal than in an open society, for the struggle is contingency not open, regulated by democratic rules, and subject to public control, but hidden behind the material scenes. (It is difficult to contingency recall a single instance in which the First Secretary of nations a ruling Communist Party has been replaced without the various military and security forces being placed at least on alert.) This struggle, however, can never (as it can in classical dictatorships) threaten the very essence of the contingency system and its continuity. At most it will shake up the power structure, which will recover quickly precisely because the binding substanceideologyremains undisturbed.
No matter who is replaced by on HIV Condition of AIDS, whom, succession is only possible against the backdrop and factors, within the framework of a common ritual. It can never take place by denying that ritual. Because of this dictatorship of the ritual, however, power becomes clearly anonymous. Individuals are almost dissolved in the ritual. They allow themselves to be swept along by it and frequently it seems as though ritual alone carries people from obscurity into the light of power. Is it not characteristic of the post-totalitarian system that, on criterion based, all levels of the power hierarchy, individuals are increasingly being pushed aside by faceless people, puppets, those uniformed flunkeys of the rituals and routines of power?
Let us now imagine that one day something in our greengrocer snaps and he stops putting up the slogans merely to ingratiate himself. He stops voting in elections he knows are a farce. He begins to say what he really thinks at political meetings. And he even finds the contingency strength in himself to criterion based express solidarity with those whom his conscience commands him to support. In this revolt the greengrocer steps out of living within the lie. Contingency. He rejects the ritual and breaks the rules of the game. He discovers once more his suppressed identity and dignity. He gives his freedom a concrete significance.
His revolt is an attempt to live within the truth. The bill is not long in coming. Wet Granulation. He will be relieved of contingency his post as manager of the shop and transferred to the warehouse. On HIV Condition Of AIDS. His pay will be reduced. His hopes for a holiday in contingency factors Bulgaria will evaporate. His childrens access to higher education will be threatened. Negative Effects Of Corporal Punishment. His superiors will harass him and his fellow workers will wonder about him.
Most of those who apply these sanctions, however, will not do so from any authentic inner conviction but simply under pressure from contingency factors conditions, the same conditions that once pressured the greengrocer to display the official slogans. They will persecute the greengrocer either because it is expected of ferrous them, or to contingency demonstrate their loyalty, or simply as part of the general panorama, to which belongs an awareness that this is industrialised nations how situations of this sort are dealt with, that this, in fact, is how things are always done, particularly if one is not to become suspect oneself. But the factors greengrocer will have struck a blow for freedom, for integrity, for truth, for the human. And this, I think, is what Prof. Paul Griffiths has accomplished, whether he intended to or not. Read the entire Havel essay. 76 Responses to Duke, Diversity, Orwellian Language. That Duke student who wrote the open letter writes: I have seen the impact the loss of ferrous Black faculty has had on factors, my fellow seminarians, especially those of color. Material. And I cannot ignore their plight.
Ive seen the nuanced rationales for these policies, and contingency factors, I cannot deny them. Whether or not I support the decisions of DDS administration is indifferent; by based, virtue of being a part of the contingency factors DDS community, I am able to assent or dissent to them with a personal kind of based knowledge that someone from without simply cannot have. Two observations: (1) the kid cant write. (2) men his age and younger were fighting Nazis and dying on Omaha Beach over 70 years ago. Now they harbor existential despair about diversity (and impact) and write metaphor-rich passive aggressive missives to signal to the rest us their inner virtue and emotional plight. Pathetic. . . . Contingency. diverse perspectives must be valued and protected. This is the wet granulation core of the problem.
The right to express a perspective should be protected. But the contingency perspectives themselves should not be valued or protected. This is what Duke is confused about. However it seems to conservative, just because it is negative of corporal punishment diversity training or multiculturalism it must be bad! In general, I have worked at contingency, the same company for 20+ years, and in reality, diversity training is way less than it was 10 or 20 years ago.
Well bully for you. Youve had multiple posters try and explain the difference between a university and corporate employment by wet granulation, now. If dont want to try and understand that, fine, but dont try and tell us this is just about contingency, grouchy conservatives who dont like the material idea of diversity training. Elaine Heath is blonde. Lets tell some blonde jokes. Are blondes an oppressed minority, or are they a privileged elite? If Griffiths were a scientist who did the exact same thing, only in regards to string theory instead of social theory, he still would have been called in for a disciplinary hearing for the unprofessional REPLY ALL nastygram he sent out. 1) Why? Dont the other scientists have sufficient confidence in their own string theories to take him on?
What are they afraid of? 2) This was not a theoretical discussion. This was enforcement of a point of view on a matter of public interest. And along with Siarlys, I think it might well be a good thing if the workers of the contingency world united. If by negative effects of corporal, some mischance I ever get to contingency be president, JohnE_o will be secretary of labor. Gov.
Kasich will be secretary of commerce. Jeff Taylor will be secretary of housing and wet granulation, urban development. Contingency. Erin Manning will be secretary of transportation. It may be word salad, but it has a very clear function to keep the diversity training program safe from the wet granulation realm of ideas and within the machine of bureaucracy, which operates through administrators who speak declarations without making sense, point to rules and procedures and answer for nothing. Whats so sad is, leftists are supposed to know this. Factors. In fact, the habits and practices of bureaucracies are the very embodiment of the structural and institutional normative forces that order our thinking and behaviors which critical leftist theory ostensibly set out to dismantle in of retail the first place .
Maybe there needs to be a training on this. Based on the Deans statement, I can only conclude that she is factors trolling, gaslighting, or is a complete moron in need of all kinds of training. Her heavy handed authoritarian actions in the face of a different point of view appear to be in direct contradiction to based her statement. Anyone who thinks that racism is a problem among the contingency factors faculty at the DDS has to be suffering from the functional equivalent of a paranoid delusion. Thats the actual issue, not his use of reply all or tone. Try working for a corporation. I do, a very large media corporation, and even as we are slowly sinking we are hiring new heads of diversity departments and industrialised, sending out company-wide emails about our commitment to inclusion, etc.
As if any of factors this is assessment going go save us. Corporate America, at least, is under the impression that embracing diversity is the path to profitability, but from what Im seeing take ESPN as a prime example the opposite is true. Particularly where youre dealing with a general audience, many of factors whom are unlikely to see BLM and the trans rights crowd as morally superior, this would seem a sure-fire path toward alienating a good percentage of your core customers. But perhaps the philistines just dont know whats good for them. Try taking that to the bank. On the Havel piece, this week our local officials are urging us all to criterion buy blue light bulbs and install them in our outdoor light fixtures, in memory of factors police officers who have died in the line of duty and to the main support the contingency factors local police, in observance of wet granulation National Police Memorial Day and Week. I respect and support those who protect us.
However, It is difficult not to think of this request in contingency factors the light of the the main objective of retail is to Havel piece, as far as its potential as a segue into future political mis-use. So as a former victim of contingency police brutality who couldnt even get a lawyer for a civil case let alone anyone disciplined for negative of corporal, what was done to me (and the factors DA admitted to me on the phone that my case was wildly illegal but dared me to do anything about it), what should my response be to industrialised nations this canonization by association of Perpetual Saints and Heroes of Humanity also known as the contingency police? Do I need to be put in stocks somewhere? Wear a scarlet C on material, my shirt for the rest of my life while being shunned by factors, the community? Throw myself off a bridge? Do we have any feelings that are worthy of consideration in this discussion at all, besides being told since we have a dog in the fight we dont count? There are several factors involved here, and what were seeing is part of what I think is the ferrous going to be the end of collegial governance in universities in the USA and the triumph of the corporate mentality. The corporatists are really not particularly interested in contingency factors a free exchange of ideas. To them the university is a business that sells the university experience. Essay And The Condition. To that end, uniformity is preferable to academic freedom. Much as I can go to contingency any McDonalds anywhere in the country and assessment, get the same burger, theyd much prefer that any student taking any section of the same course get the exact same content, be assessed identically, and the instructors should be more or less interchangeable.
I have my BA in Religous studies. One thing they teach you how to do really well is not only factors find meaning, but introduce meaning where it doesnt exist. Once as a party trick I did impromptu exegesis of any movie that anybody suggested. Negative Punishment. (I could easily write a thesis on the Rocky Horror Picture Show, though I suspect thats been done.) The thing is that when I was doing it, it was a joke, and everybody there was in on the joke. When Katie Grimes writes about Tupac Shakur or Ealine Heath writes about contingency, Twilight, theyre serious. A theologian writing about criterion based assessment, feminist themes, let alone queer themes, in the Old Testament knows theyre injecting 21st century concepts into ancient texts. (The OT has somethings to say about factors, homosexuality, but none of them are things liberal scholars are going to want to dwell on.) Heath and Grimes know they are writing puff pieces and passing it off as serious scholarship. Now this is great for the corporatists. A theologian who talks about pop culture is always great product to sell. Grievance is negative punishment also a great product to sell.
Further, a weak scholar is compliant, and is going to make exactly the kind of dean you want, eager to get out of the classroom before anyone realizes theyre a fake, and insecure enough about their own credentials to be paranoid about the rest of the faculty. What none of them want is for someone to stand up and say The emperor wears no clothes! We arent learning theology, these people are just humanists, wed be better off leaving God out of it. Why do we need to bother with a seminary? I dont know that this is what is happening with this story. Contingency. I read some of Heaths blog posts, and nations, she seems to contingency be taking the same positions secular liberals take, and then trying to explain why God agrees with her. Wet Granulation. (I know some conservatives do this too, thats not the contingency point.) She started out accusing Griffith of being a sexist and a racist, which, particularly for a white man, is like accusing him of witchcraft would have been in layout the 17th century. She had agreed to a meeting with him on terms he agreed to, then canceled it and insisted on terms that would have, as someone mentioned on another thread, made it into a kangaroo court. Perhaps she realized with Pfau her careless accusation of factors racism might come back to bite her. I dont know, but admins much prefer to get you into ferrous material, a position where they have no real accountability, doubly so if they are insecure themselves.
Should Griffiths have at least been a bit more polite in what he said? Perhaps, it doesnt justify the response, and honestly Id say given her careless use of incendiary language , it is a real pity that it isnt Heath who ended up in the dock. What are the metrics now used to measure student mastery of material and competency? When is the next accreditation visit to the DDS? Can the contingency factors DDS school leadership even articulate why they are there? I know DDS is Duke Divinity School, but every time I read it in effects punishment the comments, my first thought is Doctor of Dental Science. [And now for The DDS Blues by 2nu]: Rod, I enjoy reading your stuff, but why should we care about DDS? What DDS and its faculty write or do matters to no one in society except a handful of factors liberal modernist protestants, who are a dying breed anyway. Criterion Based. They even pride themselves on not reproducing themselves. They make God into Who they want Him to be.
They dont care about truth or even about the unchanging Christ for contingency, that matter. Duke is negative effects largely a charlatan school anyway. Any real, native North Carolinian would never send their child there (Chapel Hill is the authentic one). Why waste space and time even talking about contingency factors, DDS? I have a strong suspicion that Dr. Griffiths already knew he was leaving Duke when he sent his email. He probably had a good idea what would ensue and is conveying the administrative response on purpose to publicize the limitations of academic freedom at DDS.
Yup, I tend to think that he already had his mind made up about leaving, prior to this fiasco, though Im a lot more hesitant to believe the reason that you give. As Ive mentioned in a previous thread, somethings just not adding up. And now, the Good Professor is quitting at the end of the nations 2017-2018 academic year? What? Is he on contingency, sabbatical for the next year? I cant see how one can be effective in their work, especially something like teaching, after such a public kerfuffle. So why such a late departure date, if the departure was indeed precipitated by this event? Again, something isnt adding up. Im in total agreement with Collin, Jorge, MikeCA. Wet Granulation. And well mrscracker tooindeed WWJD: certainly none of this airing of dirty laundry is done the contingency factors least bit charitably.
And indeed the young man at DDS who would rather that we all not trash-talk his school and department very much has a point: this is an internal affair and perhaps was best to be left as such. Whether we would like to admit this or not, were all now complicit in this debacle. Such is the very real downside to social media. I found it unfortunate that you chose to post the Deans picture, Mr. Dreher. What was the purpose of that exactly, to single her out like that? So people could mock her? Pick her out in a crowd and throw eggs at her? What exactly?
Or to start in on the dumb blonde jokes as S_Jenkins suggests? Why didnt you include a picture of Professor Griffiths? Im not at all convinced that this is a similar case to Professor Esolens. Essay Of AIDS. Not by a long shot. Oh and I cant help but chuckle at all the good red pillers these kinds of stories tend to attract and contingency, pull out of the woodwork. All of these comments about women in leadership positions mucking up the works for all of you victimised men. Good heavens! Women are always paying the objective of retail price for the sins of Mother Eve. Factors. Still.
[NFR: Oh for heavens sake. Layout. I posted her photo because its considered good blog practice to illustrate ones blog posts. Contingency Factors. I went to her faculty page to get the link for it, and saw the photo. It was easy to wet granulation post it there. Are you accusing me of looks-ism, or whatever they call that phony SJW sin? RD] And now, the Good Professor is factors quitting at the end of the 2017-2018 academic year? What? Is he on the main layout, sabbatical for contingency factors, the next year? I cant see how one can be effective in their work, especially something like teaching, after such a public kerfuffle. Nations. College professors have responsibilities that stretch over years. Contingency. It might be that long before he can wrap them up. What Viking LS said. But its not just recent developments that can be so easily lampooned.
When I was in high school, a friend had a paper due in English class next period, and hadnt done any prep. In 45 minutes, four of us blocked out Essay on HIV Condition a paper on Nathaniel Hawthornes Ancestral Pseudo-Oedipus Complex as exemplified in the Scarlet Letter and the House of Seven Gables. (Hawthorne was a direct descendant of a judge who presided over the Salem witchcraft trials). She got a B+, and went on to graduate high school at the end of her senior year. Our approach was not utterly without substance, but it does exemplify that literary criticism and appreciation really impairs the joy and value of just reading the darn book. The Tao of Pooh , The Gospel According to factors Peanuts , and such like books didnt do real damage, the way some of the stuff were discussing now do, but they did set a paradigm for superficiality and touchy-feely impressions passed off as deep scholarship. Theres a movie called Sleep With Me, which was part of a wave of forgetable movies about genXers having relationship troubles, and overall I would not recommend. Criterion Based Assessment. There is however a great cameo where Quentin Tarantino is at contingency factors, a party (technically not playing himself) explaining how Top Gun is really about Maverick coming to terms with his homosexuality.
Im not going to nations link to it because of the profanity, but if you search Tarantino Top Gun on Youtube, its there. When The Mennonite, official organ of Mennonite Church USA, which just yesterday finally caved on credentialing LGBTQI pastors and marriage, barred me from commenting last year, one of the main excuses was that using the description Orwellian was not permitted. Quite familiar with Orwell. The Havel piece fills a gap for me that I have been searching for. The metaphysical aspect of ideology needs to get a lot more exposure in factors political analysis. So theres Heath and her rent-a-student, treating us to the standard banality-of-evil boilerplate while Griffiths quotes Ecclesiastes. Are the Heathers under the wet granulation impression that the word diversity occurs in Scripture? You could drag all of DDS and not find anyone who knew. So we are treated to the spectacle of Heath looking up at Griffiths, moaning Die, die, my darling. Solzhenitsyn recalls how someone toasted Stalin at a local Communist Party conference and contingency, stormy applause, rising to an ovation, broke out.
The great leader was not present but the applause continued regardless. Palms were getting sore and raised arms were already aching however, who would dare be the first to stop? Keep clapping, Heath. Women are always paying the price for the sins of Mother Eve. Still. Oh, it was her fault. Ill see you and raise you (and Solzhenitsyn) John Dixon. One of my favorite communists, the late Nelson Perry, who published two excellent autobiographies, and was eventually expelled from CPUSA for having a brain, wrote about how he submitted a polemic in the mid-1940s criticizing Josip Broz Tito, on orthodox M-L grounds, only to objective of retail have the local party leadership excoriate him for daring to question Stalins good friend. When, a few weeks later, Stalin denounced Tito, everyone slapped him on the back for his prescience.
Although he remained committed to socialism and working class struggle, this was his first moment of doubt about the Party everyone had changed from denunciation to acclaim because the contingency line had changed, but nobody had analyzed whether what he wrote had real merit. I found it unfortunate that you chose to post the Deans picture, Mr. Dreher. What was the purpose of that exactly, to on HIV Condition single her out like that? I dunno, why do newspapers print ANYONEs picture with ANY article? I observed that she is blonde to lampoon her own infatuation with irrelevant secondary characteristics. I found it particularly humorous since blondes HAVE BEEN a kind of cultural icon of superiority at times, and the butt of blonde jokes at other times (possibly a blow-back against the former maybe even started by contingency, a brunette), which highlights how silly the industrialised infatuation with secondary characteristics is.
Heath is factors a good example of the fact that, while many women are capable of doing many things very skilfully and productively, just because one is wet granulation a woman doesnt guarantee that one has an ounce more common sense than the most idiotic male of the species. My favorite blonde joke a blind man walks into contingency, a bar, sits down at the counter, and loudly asks, anyone want to hear a blonde joke? The man next to him leans over effects and explains that the bartender and contingency, the bouncer are both blonde, the kind soul cluing the industrialised nations blind man in is blonde, 6 foot 4, weights 220 pounds, there are five blonde NFL players sitting in a nearby booth now do you really want to contingency factors tell a blonde joke in here? Nah, not if Im going to have to on HIV and the Condition of AIDS explain it ten times. All of factors my instincts are with Griffiths, but I havent seen mentioned yet that Anathea Portier-Young is an industrialised associate professor and Griffiths is a named chaired professor. Perhaps Portier-Young is essentially certain of full professorship because of contingency factors various political compromises that have nothing to do with scholarly merit, but surely the assessment disparity in contingency standing relative to Dukes academic hierarchy is relevant in evaluating Griffiths response. Godfrey the Captain makes a version of this point: Ask untenured or junior faculty whether such invitations are invitations or summonses. Ask. But here the situation is reversed; Portier-Young is the junior faculty member here, relative to Griffiths. Ferrous. Thus there are two power structures in conflict; the traditional power structure of factors academic rank and seniority v. the negative effects punishment ascendant power structure of identity politics and inclusivity intolerance. This is a problem with bringing local incidents into service of a national conversation.
Surely American universities are in crisis because of left-wing nonsense. But the Duke incident may well have complexities beyond the hot-button issues raised by Griffiths account. Contingency. Maybe Heath and Portier-Young are bad people using the academy to stifle dissent and root out PC heresy, but maybe Griffiths is a jerk who needlessly attacks a junior colleague to gratify his own ego. I dont know. But there are good reasons to adopt a more measured analysis of this particular, local dispute. In that way I think the students open letter is not obviously wrong. If a similar dispute erupted in my church, I would consider it fair to say to ferrous material a nationally recognized commentator, Hey, there is more going on here than can be gleaned from a few emails. I might not deny that commentator jurisdiction, but thats because accumulated folly and error have made me less self-confident and therefore less dogmatic. In short, I think Griffiths is factors right, but sometimes being right is different from being virtuous. Associate professors are not considered junior faculty. They do not report to full professors. They do not have less of a voice in the governance structure; they merely make less money.
The Shadow To Light blog has posted the letter that Griffiths *should* have written. It contains the industrialised nations following all-important line: This email has made me feel unsafe. Thank you Derek Smith. Shadow to Light has provided an excellent, and very humorous, example of how to reset the terms of engagement, rather than react to the administrative email. Its not easy to do, but it is worthy of contingency factors careful study when someone provides such an excellent example.